BesslerWheel.com

Indeed AB, if the wheel turns on an unknown principle then that's pretty dangerous. You have to find out the principle before it breaks down and lose countless effort and sanity trying to replicate what you had.

I had never heard of Bessler or his wheel until today while searching "gravity" motors. In 1973 I built a ferrous wheel with "tinker toys" only to have friends begin to "modify" it and we spent a few days trying to make it the silliest looking thing and still turn. I w...

Lifters don't work in a vacuum case so that tells you it is Newtonian science of action & reaction as Bill says [certainly not unknown scientific principles imo]. Deny ignorance remember? The only test so far known is the one on naudin's site which even proved there was more going on than ioniz...

Nicely said primemignonite. The funny thing is that you still have a very big number of people adhering to this philosophy. Talking in riddles, "revealing" their "secret" in small steps or even just straight out defrauding people. Luckily the internet has changed a lot and there'...

To be quite frank there weren't that many inventions that are unique in their nature across the history. Most inventions/patents can be seen as variations of one of the top 20 MT's. I think most poeple just have given up because of the lack of skills they had to make more complex combinations. In my...

Here's another idea that might lead to somewhere. I KNOW this is a basic PM idea that belongs probably to level 1 (I like to put a level on PM design for instance MT1 or MT9 can be said to be level 1) or even level 2 designs. And I know the flaw is obvious. I'm just sharing this so it might spark ot...

After some revision the idea I proposed is no good it will just balance the whole wheel just like your current one. But the solution remains correct. That is that you need to raise and lower the pistons/weights without affecting the wheel at all. If you can do this then you can joggle the watter aro...

Michael thanks for making me understand not only your wheel but AB's as well since I never bothered understanding it :p. What jim points out though doesn't make sense to me. You're not pushing the fluid one sided but you have both sides doing the job. I have 0 experience with this wheel but lets ass...

I will do the same in the future if you also do it. But can people put both put empirical as metric units when they write the dimensions. A fast conversion method is google itself. Just type in the search area "2.5 pound to kg" for example to get the answer. "The cause of the force I ...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...I rarely laugh at jokes on the net because there are so many but that one managed to do the trick. Good job.

Enough with the clues we're at 2008 and they brought nothing and will bring nothing. Work together correct each other and hopefully come to a united working model.

I believe you can edit your posts Ant no need to keep making new posts if noone has replied.

Ant wrote:Anybody checked out this link - museum of unworkable devices?

Of course but more than checking out I haven't done. I have nothing to find on a website that opposes my believes..

If the above looks like MT1 then I am visually impaired. No it doesn't (and this is no joke) but it looks like MT 2 :D. The problem with these designs is that they form only one system. You'll need two or more system that work together in outbalancing the whole wheel. But alone they don't do anythi...

If you are interested to know if it works, 12 arms at 8 thick * 30² it should be built by the end of December or earlier. It will be proved or disproved at that time.

I'm eager to see the finished thing. So you better do your best.