BesslerWheel.com

Yes, solar chimneys have been used for heating and cooling. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_chimney I think there would be enough power to turn the wheel if it wasn’t attached to anything used in the demonstrations. It was already criticized for being weak, so it would have needed a lot less pow...

Disregarding what CGPT says regarding the air resistance, could we transfer enough heat into one side of the wheel, while keeping the other side cool to maintain power at 26rpm? I think so. I’m also wondering if the cool side was maintained by the same method using the cool night air or any dungeon...

dax wrote:No wonder they are so adamant that the wheel couldn't be turned through the bearings.

Yes, they certainly removed all suspicion from anything driving the wheel via the bearings. I can't argue with that.

The best magic gets you look at something else besides the trick.

4 isn't in this argument. 5. Power was transferred thermally through the cloth. 1/4 " bearing is quite thin for a 12' wheel. I don't think it weighed even 100 kg. It looked like they might have been less than a foot long so < 2 " subject to friction in the journals. http://www.orffyre.com/...

So, with 30,240 watt-hours of energy, you could theoretically lift a 100kg mass to a height of approximately 110,935.88 meters (about 111 kilometers) on Earth, assuming ideal conditions and neglecting losses due to friction and other factors. That calculation from ChatGPT was correct I don't think ...

if the servant says the above, she tells a great falsehood. If there was fraud it seems it was contained inside the wheel itself . So in terms of Potential energy: how high could I theoretically lift 100kg with 30,240 Wh ChatGPT: ......So, with 30,240 watt-hours of energy, you could theoretically l...

Under no load, it would not require much. It’s difficult to estimate without all the specs. It could be less than 5 watts depending on its mass? I’ve never trusted the power demonstrations mainly because they weren’t more than a few seconds of load. They could have been staged to his liking to not a...

[quote=eccentrically1 post_id=202151 time=<a href="tel:1695559469">1695559469</a> user_id=2009] . .. .. . No, I don't think so. A bell crank is just that. A lever that redirects a force. It doesn't add force or energy. I believe Sam already posted it didn't work ? How can you squeeze ener...

. .. .. . Adding a bell crank wouldn't solve the energy deficit, it's just a mechanism that needs to be cranked, and gravity can't do that. Is it realistic to think of the bell crank as a phase shifting transmission useful in squeezing some energy out of a so called gradient between translational &...

Without further evidence, it is difficult to determine exactly how Bessler may have defrauded his witnesses. However, the fact that perpetual motion machines violate the laws of physics suggests that his device was likely a hoax in some way. Ecc1: There's the problem; chat sees it too. You know ver...

You’re welcome, Sam. You’re going to need more though.
Sorry.

Ok. Good luck.

I answered your previous post before you edited to add the bell crank stuff.
If weights don't rise and fall then you simply have a flywheel.

Adding a bell crank wouldn't solve the energy deficit, it's just a mechanism that needs to be cranked, and gravity can't do that.

That's a flywheel. What every design becomes at the right rpm's.

If we accept that it is impossible to avoid all energy losses in a build in the real world , then we have to accept that energy out would be less than energy in , and that to solve such a problem requires to adress the energy loss . If you think about it , if the wheel was not fraud it would be bas...