Search found 5 matches
- Tue Dec 20, 2016 5:25 am
- Forum: Fraud
- Topic: @moderator
- Replies: 94
- Views: 304529
re: @Scott Ellis
Hey, James, I know how cruel guys can be. It's not right but that's how guys are. You seem to me to be a very caring person. You want to do work that proves Bessler. No one cares about that but you do. I think that's cool. Any way don't give up. Feel free to PM me. Hey, who knows. Maybe we can hook ...
- Mon Dec 05, 2016 10:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Computers?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9181
re: Computers?
Thank you, Walter, for throwing a wet blanket on my idea.
Jagoda.
Jagoda.
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:21 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Computers?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9181
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:05 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Computers?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9181
Re: re: Computers?
Perhaps a more complete answer to John would have been: A computer doesn't have to comprehend its output, it just computes or processes its algorithm. But when it can and does , it doesn't have to find Perpetual Motion. I was just wondering if I got this. Now if a computer does understand that it f...
- Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:55 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Computers?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9181
Re: re: Computers?
'Jeopardy' players answer questions with already known answers. Hello everyone. This is my first post so go easy on me guys. What if, as Rlortie suggests, the answer was given. What I mean is we already have a wheel spinning at some given speed and at some given force. Then the computer program cou...