BesslerWheel.com

Can anyone tell me where the 3rd clue in the list comes from?
"Weights gained force from their own swinging."
- Bessler

Congratulations gkrouse!! It had to be obvious that what most people were trying did not work, and that it would take a different thinking to achieve it. Look forward to your reveal. My opinion - Any even number of 'weights' will work as they work in pairs. 'Weights' is a very misleading word, cylin...

George, Yes the earth has no reference point. That is the purpose of using gyroscopes. (They have been used for years in navigation since they hold a reference). Maybe you didn't understand the description of building a huge gyroscope on top of the world axis point and use that for the rotation of t...

.

Finally you get some information that has a scientific basis that does not defy the laws of physics, and it gets labeled 'bogus' without a reasonable argument as to why you believe it bogus. Point is - Even if there was a video of the device operating would you still call it 'bogus' just as they did...

Bessler might have thought it was perpetual motion, but it wasn't. Bessler did not understand the science behind what he had created, he just understood the effect and created his wheel around that. An American Theoretical Physicist built a 'perpetual wheel' in 2002 but he explains where the energy ...

OK thanks. I will try that tomorrow on my laptop. My android device won't do it.

I am still trying to work out why you would think it's a mockumentary. Is that because what they show does not fit your idea of what eye witnesses called cylindrical weights?

OK. I don't understand the language. Can I ask, How can you tell?

I don't understand German (I am guessing this is German) but I am wondering if this find was Bessler's stuff? https://youtu.be/f2zZ7WOnA0o