BesslerWheel.com

WaltzCee wrote: ↑Thu Jun 08, 2023 8:17 pm

LustInBlack wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:49 am This thread is boring...

8]

good read.

For those geeks attempting humor, study this thread. When you're finished, study it again.

It's still boring even after almost 20 years.

Yeah you guys are right. Btw you don't need to breath to live, just calculate it, try it!

Copied from my thread in Community to make it visible to non-members Chris Harper 2014- The Crossbar With a sense of certainty, very below I show the 'Crossbar' Bessler eluded to, with the component characteristics a match for the key clues here left behind. I am certain others will be able to quot...

@Raj & Chris - neither of you have anything, so what's the beef? Both of you are dementedly trying to get free energy from gravitational interactions, without even measuring anything. All of your efforts are futile. All either of you will ever produce is fully-conservative exchanges of PE to KE...

ChrisHarper wrote:Ecc,

Without any arrogance , I know EXACTLY what Bessler did to achieve the results documented across the 3 or more? different devices exhibited.

Each just used variants of the same principle Logic.

Chris

Proven by the turning wheel beside you that generates energy /s

Is fractal. It is also why we all follow the same patterns and keep failing. Funny that nobody saw the fractal nature of the pantograph in the toy page. Also : "No. 11: This figure is doubled , as one can see, and the form does not involve much, but there is more in it than meets the eye, as wi...

Idiotic bot.

You are going exactly where everyone has gone before.

You don't seem to realize that whichever way you choose to shift your weights, that gravity field is conservative. The only way for a solution that I see.. is if somehow, another force interaction could counter balance the shifting of mass AND permit reset of said shifter mechanism. I don't see this...

I feel so bad for Raj for not trying to understand what triplock has been saying all along this thread..

Best of luck tho.

It is easy to machine and has a high lubricant low friction value. Which I am not sure can be duplicated in 3D process. I don't think you should invest in a 3d printer if only for that. 3d printing would be great if you have a need for highly customized complex parts with low sheer load. And don't ...

There's a fine line between a genius and a crazy person, be careful not to cross that line. (if you didn't already)

Hi, Funny that this topic just appears, I just received my second 3d printer.. I bought a Ultimaker 2, it's basically a high end "consumer/hobbyist level" 3d printer.. 3000$ USD My thing-o-matic had a tiny build platform and was far too loud, I needed a comfortable machine, the ultimaker w...

I will repeat myself, it's so freaking simple, I can't believe someone would lose years on this.. Your mass on the falling side is falling slower than the mass rising on the other side. Even if you have more mass on the heavy side, your energy in equals energy out. Think of a crowbar.. The little le...

I meant little inertia, not no inertia.. .( How come I can't change my post 5 seconds after posting, useless forum rule)