Search found 1822 matches
- Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:29 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: energy producing experiments
- Replies: 1910
- Views: 372504
re: energy producing experiments
I'm probably wasting my breath, but it occurred to me that a mechanism I invented was designed, and only works, if angular momentum is conserved. On the 15th you said, "If you hang the same mass from each rim the force of the hanging mass will accelerate each rim to the same circumference veloc...
- Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: energy producing experiments
- Replies: 1910
- Views: 372504
re: energy producing experiments
I think if you take the reaction of the earth into account, while ignoring its daily rotation, the initial and final momenta will be zero, both linearly and angularly.
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:38 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 18885
re: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
If the aether moved with the earth, then waves in distant, stationary aether that travel into the earth's local aether would get swept along with it. This deviation in the path would make the star look like it is stationary relative to the earth, which would prevent aberration. Using the raindrop mo...
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:17 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The energy obtained exceeds the cost of creating the differential ...
- Replies: 26
- Views: 12207
re: The energy obtained exceeds the cost of creating the dif
(As requested). It is the interpretation of facts that is at issue, the asterisks being incorrect: The heat pump is common proof that it IS possible to extract large amounts of *useable* power from a uni-directional energy source by creating a differential - and the energy obtained can far exceed th...
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:39 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 18885
re: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
I think the assumption that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light is highly speculative Among other things, it is assumed that light travels at the same speed in all inertial frames. Then, they derive that these imply that nothing can accelerate to exceed light speed. But I have been to...
- Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:02 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Where is the inferior weight ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4295
re: Where is the inferior weight ?
He did say the weights act in pairs, but I'm not aware of any clear clues about which did what. I agree with Jim, and add that "superior weight" might conceptually be better translated as "overbalance" (even though that word doesn't really make any sense), as in the distribution ...
- Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:47 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 18885
re: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
What parts of special relativity are still speculative? (Maybe start a new thread for that).
- Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:35 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The energy obtained exceeds the cost of creating the differential ...
- Replies: 26
- Views: 12207
re: The energy obtained exceeds the cost of creating the dif
He's partially right, but COP is arguably a better measure of efficacy than efficiency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump#Efficiency
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump#Efficiency
- Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:28 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Want to know your destiny?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 29311
re: Want to know your destiny?
I said it was just an FYI, and it's not like I was off topic. It was for the casually-religious reader, who may have forgotten what God said; I didn't even say if I believed it. :p I have no recollection that Bessler did magic; if that's all then he's less evil than me. P.S. Since you brought it up...
- Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:04 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
- Replies: 39
- Views: 18885
re: Reactionless conversion of angular to linear momentum(?)
Greendoor, I had difficulty understanding; if the two axles are horizontal, then you wouldn't need so many wheels, because accelerating one wheel wouldn't make the platform rotate: if it did, the platform would try to rotate about the same horizontal axis, which would require it to break through the...
- Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:51 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Want to know your destiny?
- Replies: 29
- Views: 29311
re: Want to know your destiny?
Just an FYI, Deu 18:9-14; When thou art come into the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [o...
- Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:00 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: My perpetual motion helicopter works great!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6827
re: My perpetual motion helicopter works great!
I suspect that a working wheel could be designed to produce the same energy during each rotation, regardless of speed, which would cause it to accelerate until it breaks. Of course it would be better not to design it that way.
- Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:57 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: My perpetual motion helicopter works great!
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6827
re: My perpetual motion helicopter works great!
I doubt it.
- Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Inertia against gravity...
- Replies: 72
- Views: 30188
re: Inertia against gravity...
If you have a zigzag of brachistochrones from 12 to 6, then the weights will come down faster than a zigzag of straight ramps. The turtle toy is understood, as a gyroscopic effect: IIRC, there is an energy degeneracy (which is that a continuum of states have the same energy), so it can move among th...
- Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:46 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Bessler used pulleys
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6412
re: Bessler used pulleys
I'm sure it's been discussed, but did you have a particular point to make about it?