murilo wrote:Enough will be the clear recognition of inventor/invention! The rest will come easy and naturally.
So as naturally will come all applications, evolutions and developments... and even the private 'model registrations' - not a problem and not big deal, as usual in all business classes.
TC!
M
We have down here an ex-president, that is very well trained and skilled to sell 'snake-oil', since he's specialist is talk, talk and talk!
When leaving government, 100's of stupid entities all around the world call him to come for a speak...
His payment for this important job is just free US 125,000/each!
Now, guess what you'll get for the PM invention!
This is one of the reasons WHY many will 'not understand' avalanchedrive!
An idea to be mad and to kill for!
Wooooooshhhh... 8[
If the inventor of the avalanche drive believes it could work, he should just build a small scale model and prove it. Anything less is just a waste of oxygen.
My 'dear clever and intelligent' colleagues of JB forum...
your above msg just come to reinforce my words! Take another look at the conceptions and respect mech logic.
That's all I ask! Not a sacrifice! 8) For example, do yourself a question: what will be the applied TORSION capacity of a free pile with 100kg on a wheel perimeter? And 1000kg? And 100t?
TC!
M
PS: how can you talk about a stuff you can't reach?
rlortie wrote:A am with Jim_Mich on this! Patent no matter what you do with it. If you do not patent, then you can bet your sweet bippy, that Siemons, GE, or some other like corporation will.
You cannot free source something you have already given the rights away to. Remember, the first to patent gets the golden global award, not the inventor.
I also agree that if the inventor gave it away he would gain immediate worldwide attention, but unfortunately it would be for the biggest buffoon in history.
Ralph
A published disclosure establishes "prior art" and the corporation's patent is toilet paper.
Not knowing is not the problem. It is the knowing of what just isn't so.
It is our responsibilities, not ourselves,that we should take seriously.
Like I've said before, a patentable improvement on that "prior art" could take it from a low power curiosity to a truly viable source of energy for all the world - and so the corporation's patent is then truckloads and boatloads of rolls of legal tender.
There, of course, will be numerous patents on improvements to the technology once the genie has been let out of the bottle, and even to include some things that might seem rather obvious to some of the more creative sorts, too.
A corporation is not likely going to invest in the labor to develop such improvements, however, just to sit on them, so if you secure your legal rights to the original technology you can legally "encourage" them to play fair.
"Free" open source software works because those who write the programs automatically "legally" own the copyright and so can make stipulations as to who gets to legally make those copies and to some degree even how they are legally used. In other words open sourced software doesn't work outside of societies' laws but rather works with them.
Like with the copyrights, the law would also be on the side of those who have the patents - and whether those people are generous and benevolent saints or corrupt and greedy bastards - and whether any of those patent holders are the inventor of the original technology.
Also, it's probably a little easier to make copies of computer programs than appliances which could weigh thousands of pounds. In this modern world, then, Mr. Manufacturing Corporation is going to be involved whether you like it or not - and whether you like their business practices or not.
...oops... ...unless, of course, you can legally dictate some of the terms on which they must agree to operate if they are going to be in "your" business for the next 20 years.
It seems a bit ironic that those who are most paranoid about evil thieving governments and corporations would in fear and confusion just hand them their keys.
