Perpetual Satellite

[veproject1]

Mechanical device that runs forever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9xNN0XtPk8[/i]

[sleepy]

decent film editing,but you did not control your light source very well. the frame flicker and change in speed and lighting were the give-aways.You are an illusionist.But it is entertaining

[rasselasss]

A good example of what Wagner et all experienced when looking at Bessler's Wheel....and they could see nothing of its mech....makes me wonder if someone did put on here a genuine working/exposed mech.wheel , or elsewhere...would we believe it ??,i suppose its human nature to doubt....remember what Bessler achieved could go against what we imagine or Physics states is possible....as others here have stated many times,the only way to disprove/prove an idea is to replicate it...

[rlortie]

Should have paid more attention to camera angle set up. would not be able to see that the vertical pivot shaft goes through the saddle and flat disk, and then likely the table top.

What was wrong about using the already existing hole? And why the setscrew into pawl support and horizontal shaft when it already has washers and cotter keys?

Ralph

[jim_mich]

makes me wonder if someone did put on here a genuine working/exposed mech.wheel , or elsewhere...would we believe it ??

That is the reason why a real working wheel will need documentation showing exactly how to build an inexpensive replication of a working model. Initially no one will believe. But one person will duplicate it. They will say it works. Others will claim its impossible. But a few more will duplicate it. And soon it will go viral.

It is the only way to prove a wheel works. Making a video will prove nothing. Making claims will prove nothing. Explaining why it works, though helpful, will prove nothing.

A skeptic will only believe a PM wheel works if they have built it for themselves. So it must be easy and cheap to build. Or, if you have the financial ability, you can build models and give them away to skeptics. But the skeptic will destroy the model while searching for a reason to call it fraud.

[AB Hammer]

Jim_Mich

I do believe you got it covered. The new real of proof. Just as bad as Bigfoot.

Alan

[rasselasss]

After looking at Ve1's many video's on the youtube link i have to say his skills in Model building are excellent,his replication of old designs are to be commended which he obviously spent many hours working on,all in all a talented person who enjoys what he's at......

[Fletcher]

Indeed !

He builds 'educational' devices - if you buy one you will find out how it works.

There are many I'd like to own for the craftsmanship alone.

[rickydog]

Similar to the Mann Gravity Mover where it seems like the weight is always leaning forward. Doesn't work, I tried it!

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory: ... vity_Mover

[rlortie]

Preston Stroud got all enthused and sold on the Mann Gravity Mover, he spent many of hours and much money on it. He suggested that I collaborate with him on its build.

I told him that it reminded me of a man trying to push a loaded wheelbarrow without moving his feet! It simply does not work, As I understand, he finally gave up and focused his pursuit on over the counter solar panels and the associated electronics to plug into the grid.

By the way! congratulations on finally getting your first green on your rep bar, IMO it is way past due! As previously stated, you do not post very often and therefore do not get the recognition you deserve.

Ralph

[rickydog]

Thank you Ralph, that means a lot to me coming from you.
Only 6 more greenies to go!

I wish the best for your wife and you.

[pequaide]

Note: that Fletcher supports this fraudulent individual.

Fletcher also continually quotes the work of Tarsier.

Fletcher also produces Sims designed to conserve energy.

[rlortie]

Note that on Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:50 am pequaide authored a thread titled; "Energy producing experiments"...

Ninety seven pages later bringing us to Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:26 pm with 147,325 views, this thread IMO has brought no physical advancement to that which we seek.

Now he points fingers at Fletcher for supporting a craftsman who displays his skills in the fabrication of non-working devices. Is this what is called; "the pot calling the kettle black"?

Ralph

[pequaide]

I look around on the internet for experiments; you can't find to many. People want to describe how an Atwood's works and then do the math; but then they don't followed up with a real experiment. You know: masses thumping tables and flag tripping gates; experiments.

I also wanted to find that MSU site where you interactively insert masses in an Atwood's. While I was looking in my archives for the MSU site I found the experiments I was looking for. Atwood's; double wheels; and triple wheel; on and on; lists and lists. I identified the experiments by the masses used and the dates they were done.

In the triple wheel I moved the drive mass and the driven masses to different locations. Every thing works out with F = ma; Laws of Levers; and significant quantities of energy were easily made in the lab.

You may not appreciate them R but these are some of the finest experiments in the history of Physics. From the plywood double wheel to the 48 kg RoG Flywheel they all prove that the law of conservation of energy is false. My work is hugely successful; so I get a laugh at you saying it is not. All these experiments work; your lack of insight is not my problem.

[rlortie]

Pequaide,

I commend you for finally posting a rebuttal that makes sense and is not made up of the usual repetitive test results.

OK! so your experiments work. So does mine; every time I pickup a handful of sawdust from my table saw and drop it in the waste container, I prove gravitational Pe works, therefore my experiment with falling sawdust is proven successful. no flipping of gates or flags required.

Now all you or I need to do is figure out how to make it turn a sustainable machine that provides more energy than it uses to operate. This should be a simple task for a man with your successful research experience.

Ralph