4 hp to 71 hp
Moderator: scott
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
bye Felicia!
When someone says that they're leaving and you could really give two shits less that they are. Their name then becomes "felicia", a random bitch that nobody is sad to see go. They're real name becomes irrelevant because nobody cares what it really is. Instead, they now are "felicia".
"hey guys i'm gonna go"
"bye felicia"
"who is felicia?"
"exactly bitch. buh bye."
When someone says that they're leaving and you could really give two shits less that they are. Their name then becomes "felicia", a random bitch that nobody is sad to see go. They're real name becomes irrelevant because nobody cares what it really is. Instead, they now are "felicia".
"hey guys i'm gonna go"
"bye felicia"
"who is felicia?"
"exactly bitch. buh bye."
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
He can go crawling back to the only woman who ever loved him... PALMCORTEX.
-
triplock
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
Armcortex's girlfriend is a pint glass and a pound of liver !
Do not ask me to explain :-D
Do not ask me to explain :-D
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
Don't you mean an ounce of mince and a shot glass? :-)
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
Open your ears, you lowly peasants. I will reveal something.
There was a bit of a overstatement,p , 10-13 x seems more correct
2 machines, 4 arms, machines connect to another shaft via a bit of elasticity.
Centrifugal ellipse tension must happen 4 times per revolution if the whole joule/sec is to be extracted. The centrifugal pull ellipse is in the direction where the eccentric has most speed along its orbit. Centrifugal energy has no effect on pendulum inertia when you collect it, this is where the energy comes from. In fact, the shifting of pivot helps develop pendulum energy, so you can see how everything is interlinked and energy extraxted by eccentric weight centrifugal tension.
There is 8000+ joule sec being generated but as you load it has tendency to decay so it can never be extracted by double device.
The high point of the centrifugal tension must always be there, for the resonance to maintain throughout constant loading, if it slips for just a bit vectors are no longer working together and will cause avalanche effect
Its a very challenging machine. Each pendulum must have itself decoupled from the others, with electronic feedback source, so if you are not a wiz kid in electronics, like me, you can forget about it, seriously you should lay down, admit you are not skilled enough, not motivated enough, not rich enough, and that you will always be a happy slave of our dear queen.
The luck you would need to just make it run once would be like 1/1000000.
There was a bit of a overstatement,p , 10-13 x seems more correct
2 machines, 4 arms, machines connect to another shaft via a bit of elasticity.
Centrifugal ellipse tension must happen 4 times per revolution if the whole joule/sec is to be extracted. The centrifugal pull ellipse is in the direction where the eccentric has most speed along its orbit. Centrifugal energy has no effect on pendulum inertia when you collect it, this is where the energy comes from. In fact, the shifting of pivot helps develop pendulum energy, so you can see how everything is interlinked and energy extraxted by eccentric weight centrifugal tension.
There is 8000+ joule sec being generated but as you load it has tendency to decay so it can never be extracted by double device.
The high point of the centrifugal tension must always be there, for the resonance to maintain throughout constant loading, if it slips for just a bit vectors are no longer working together and will cause avalanche effect
Its a very challenging machine. Each pendulum must have itself decoupled from the others, with electronic feedback source, so if you are not a wiz kid in electronics, like me, you can forget about it, seriously you should lay down, admit you are not skilled enough, not motivated enough, not rich enough, and that you will always be a happy slave of our dear queen.
The luck you would need to just make it run once would be like 1/1000000.
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
Felicia
I am an electronics wiz, by trade. I design and repair electronic devices for work. I have mentioned this once before, so if you can remove your head from your posterior for a moment: Electronic latches, solenoids, motors etc are not efficient, especially when you are looking for a solution that may only produce a small percentage of gain. Many idiots with a multimeter think they can measure gain from electronic devices. Youtube is proof of their lack of knowledge. Being able to play xbox games does not make you an electronics wiz.
If you have a device with gain, you should be able to drive it, and control it without electronics or motors. Even if you have to separate your output to your input, there are still mechanical ways to show input vs output energy. If you were even remotely as smart as you think you are, you would be able to design a system that efficiently feeds back to itself mechanically based on your mechanism. If it had the gain you claim in the title of this thread, that would be even simpler to show.
Loading is the point. If you load something, you are forcing it to use energy, so you can't have a gain in energy if you can't use that energy to drive a load.
Run along now, and go play in your computer generated world before your mummy tells you to brush your teeth and go to bed. Leave the electronics and mechanics to the people who know what they are doing.
I am an electronics wiz, by trade. I design and repair electronic devices for work. I have mentioned this once before, so if you can remove your head from your posterior for a moment: Electronic latches, solenoids, motors etc are not efficient, especially when you are looking for a solution that may only produce a small percentage of gain. Many idiots with a multimeter think they can measure gain from electronic devices. Youtube is proof of their lack of knowledge. Being able to play xbox games does not make you an electronics wiz.
If you have a device with gain, you should be able to drive it, and control it without electronics or motors. Even if you have to separate your output to your input, there are still mechanical ways to show input vs output energy. If you were even remotely as smart as you think you are, you would be able to design a system that efficiently feeds back to itself mechanically based on your mechanism. If it had the gain you claim in the title of this thread, that would be even simpler to show.
Loading is the point. If you load something, you are forcing it to use energy, so you can't have a gain in energy if you can't use that energy to drive a load.
Run along now, and go play in your computer generated world before your mummy tells you to brush your teeth and go to bed. Leave the electronics and mechanics to the people who know what they are doing.
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showt ... hp?t=86492
Its funny how you all want me to run along, from my own idea. When purelyprimitives tells me so it will be a different story.
Its ok, I might take a seat and let others input. This is not my favorite project anymore. Believe it or not.
Here is my respectable work, self trained and within a year I did this. When I didnt know about microcontrollers, I did everything to not have to use them.
I am not a master, but can google up and work solutions slowly I will find it.
Mechanical solution, like pulleys, I got a few nifty ideas with this.
But far from exact science.
Mechanical solution will be complex, I assure you. This is something for only the deepest of initiates. Bessler like devotion.
Only the best of the anglo-saxon wise wizard men can pull this off.
Its funny how you all want me to run along, from my own idea. When purelyprimitives tells me so it will be a different story.
Its ok, I might take a seat and let others input. This is not my favorite project anymore. Believe it or not.
Here is my respectable work, self trained and within a year I did this. When I didnt know about microcontrollers, I did everything to not have to use them.
I am not a master, but can google up and work solutions slowly I will find it.
Mechanical solution, like pulleys, I got a few nifty ideas with this.
But far from exact science.
Mechanical solution will be complex, I assure you. This is something for only the deepest of initiates. Bessler like devotion.
Only the best of the anglo-saxon wise wizard men can pull this off.
Last edited by ARMCORTEX on Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
re: 4 hp to 71 hp
Yes I have the gain now, joule/s is corrolating with what is obtainable on the shaft.
4 is the key. Further advancement will be found in pulsing methods and angle control.
There used to be only ability to generate large motion in joule/s wich should be= to 11x more hp, without it corrolating to constant load driving.
4 is the key. Further advancement will be found in pulsing methods and angle control.
There used to be only ability to generate large motion in joule/s wich should be= to 11x more hp, without it corrolating to constant load driving.