NEWS FLASH!! Fcdriver has a working wheel!!!!

[ovyyus]

Do you believe in Bessler or not?

Believing 'in' something is as likely to falsely legitimise it as it is to falsely outlaw it.

[Tarsier79]

Grimer wrote:

Do you believe in Bessler or not?

I beleive Bessler was a person. I believe Bessler had a wheel.

I do not believe every cockemamy story and claim that crosses the forum, especially without proof.

NEWS FLASH!! I do not believe FC has a working wheel.

I do not beleive you understand the implications of your own explanations of "third derivative energy". If you did, you would be able to explain it more clearly, and be able to extrapolate on this half baked theory.

I do not beleive Bessler's wheel was a traditional, or any variation of a traditional gravity wheel.

I do not know if Bessler's wheel would break COE, or extract energy from its environment, or the water that features in the DT drawings.

[Grimer]

Grimer wrote:

Do you believe in Bessler or not?

...
NEWS FLASH!! I do not believe FC has a working wheel.
...

Hopefully, we will soon find out whether he has or not.

Personally, I find in more beneficial to believe people than to disbelieve.

[Fcdriver]

To be able to explain why my system works, will be interesting, whether it be Jacobian matrix and determinant, or Newton's method, just simple Newton's second law of motion,or some other explanation. There will be just as many discussions as to why, or just how close others tried. I don't believe Besslers knew why his wheel worked, I don't think Bessler could explain his wheel in a math formula, or as a physics expert, but only as a craftsman. It works because it does!

[Grimer]

To be able to explain why my system works, will be interesting, whether it be Jacobian matrix and determinant, or Newton's method, just simple Newton's second law of motion,or .....

even Iterative Hierarchical Mechanics. ... :-)

There will be just as many discussions as to why, or just how close others tried. I don't believe Bessler knew why his wheel worked, I don't think Bessler could explain his wheel in a math formula, or as a physics expert, but only as a craftsman. It works because it does!

I can see you're not just a pretty face then.... ;-)

[Fcdriver]

Too funny

[justsomeone]

Fcdriver, what is YOUR definition of a working wheel?

[Fcdriver]

One that can be patented as a engine, a two cycle engine, force controlled drive, a engine to produce power to make electricity or pump water. A efficient use of leverage an torque to cause rotation producing power.

[Grimer]

One that can be patented as a engine, a two cycle engine, force controlled drive, a engine to produce power to make electricity or pump water. A efficient use of leverage an torque to cause rotation producing power.

I look forward to the day your black swan chugs up to Richmond.

[WaltzCee]

belief is the root of all evil

Well. as a human being, I believe I don't know everything. Am I evil? Since I don't know some things, I'm left with belief. Does that make me evil? I think, therefore I am. But I still am uncertain about some things. All I have is belief. Does that make me evil??!

I believe you're absurd. Does that make me evil?????!

Your reasoning brings to mind a nun doing squats in a cucumber field.


Is that evil?

[WaltzCee]

Hi FcDriver ,

Welcome to the club , I don't know when , but eventualy it will surface .

this is too funny, daanopperman.

[WaltzCee]

Here's a Louisville slugger for you Driver. I simulated a single arm of your idea and the genius of wm2d could not get it to make a full circle.

When I folded the lift stroke back on to the power stroke, there was a deficit and the single arm of your wood chopper mechanism couldn't complete the circle.

My belief in your idea is wavering, Driver.

Just sayin'.

[WaltzCee]

It seems I have made someone angry. :) Sincere apologies for speaking my mind. I'll do better. I promise.

[ovyyus]

I believe I don't know everything. Am I evil?

Big things have small beginnings. I guess you mean you know you don't know everything.

The opposite of 'knowing' is 'not knowing'. Substituting not knowing with belief is how the first priest was the first rogue to meet the first fool.

[WaltzCee]

Substituting not knowing with belief is how the first priest was the first rogue to meet the first fool.

unfortunately there's no prize for knowing, because I knew it was you.

<edit> ah, there seems there is a prize. :) </edit>