Polymath

[Furcurequs]

"There is a very large difference between thinking a wheel will run and knowing that a wheel will run." - pre-vampire

jim_mich,

In that thread, Raj was making the point that he considered it a foregone conclusion that his wheel only needed to be built for it to be a runner.

Isn't that the same stance you have about your own wheel concept? You only have to build it and it will work?

Yes, I knew that specifically you were talking about validation for the patent office in my prior quote of you, but of course those exact same words still apply in all other instances where a perpetual motion claim is made, too.

[daxwc]

Jim who was it that convinced and conspired with Bill to change his post in his greed to protect his IP rights? Would that person be seen as a deceiver, manipulator and liar as well as breaking some form of forum rule? Why did that person not come clean when the truth became known also?

[Furcurequs]

or a misinterpretation of the plan.

Too the blue:

Is it possible to use the downward force of all the weights on the wheel to cause an imbalance? The weight of a glacier can cause itself to melt from the bottom up.

Is this a possible principle for a design?

If it is important to you, maybe you should ask jim_mich to elaborate so that you don't misinterpret what he meant.

Of course, though, as with the first step in his plan, those steps may mean something different to him now than they did originally, too.

Btw, did you plan to be a drama queen? ...or is it just in the dna you're slinging?

[jim_mich]

Jim who was it that connived and conspired with Bill to change his post in their greed to protect their IP rights? Would that person be seen as a deceiver, manipulator and liar as well as breaking some form of forum rule?

Those are very strong words. Connived, Conspired, Greed, Deceiver, Manipulator, Liar, Forum Rule Breaker.

There was no conniving. A simple favor was asked of Bill, who I wrongly assumed to be a friend.

There was no conspiracy. A simple agreement was sought.

There was no greed. Only protection of normal intellectual property rights

There was no deception involved. But Bill ended up misunderstanding simple English and claimed he was deceived.

There was no manipulation involved. It was a simple request of a favor, in return for being put at the top of my prototype list. Bill is no longer on that list, and never again will be.

Bill was the only liar involved. He made the false statement that I had told him I had a working wheel. I posted our original emails, which proved Bill was lying. Then Bill doubled down, trying to use My Plan as an excuse for his error. And he has continually tried to claim that I’m the liar. The facts are very clear. Bill’s original claim that I lied to him, was itself a lie. My Plan was never mentioned nor hinted at in those emails. Shame on Bill for calling me a liar. I’m still waiting for an apology from Bill.

Most everyone is a Forum Rule Breaker. Personal insults. Personal attacks on people’s character. Continual harassment. Posting psycho-babble. All are against the forum rules.

daxwc, you have made these erroneous claims before. Why do you keep regurgitating these lies?

[WaltzCee]

I guess this is that awkward moment when the one starting the drama complains they hate it.

Btw, if you're here who's running hell?

[daxwc]

daxwc, you have made these erroneous claims before. Why do you keep regurgitating these lies?

Jim because you are oblivious to the truth. Not one person believes what you did was not a sin… deep down not even you.

[daxwc]

Jim: Most everyone is a Forum Rule Breaker. Personal insults. Personal attacks on people’s character. Continual harassment. Posting psycho-babble. All are against the forum rules.

Yep, but the difference is I am not complaining people are breaking the rules while doing it myself. I put it there because you might be worried that person who did all those things was breaking the forum rules and so you could hand-out some type of corporal punishment for the offense.

[ovyyus]

JM's house of cards is built on a statement that he refuses to explain:

"First get something that works!" This means a working wheel, not just a concept or idea.

JM's words, not mine.

JM can't explain why his above statement contradicts his current arguement because that would collapse his house of cards.

[WaltzCee]

Hello Dr Oh No.

Would you kindly post the earliest possible link to that quote?

Thanks in advance.

[ovyyus]

Walt, I like the way you changed JM's plan to mount a nonsense arguement in his defense. Cute :D

[ME]

[oo]
[oo]

(Edit: I couldn't decide)

[WaltzCee]

So I'll take that to mean you have no basis for your allegation.

[ovyyus]

The emperor has a new apprentice, I shall call him darth walt :D

[WaltzCee]

you may rise

[WaltzCee]

Now damit, what's so hard about providing the original link?