Sincerely, you only get my compliments for your attempt !cloud camper wrote:I was never taught anything about it in physics classes and neither was anyone else so basically I'm starting from scratch.
So I am very sorry that's not good enough for you!
I'm just not convinced Grimer's theory (or whatever it is) is good for you (or anyone); you seem to agree with that.
Added summary
- Hence I continuously ask Grimer for his intrusions and branding of EG and 3rd derivative energy.
To be clear: I have no issues with you nor with your explanation of "jerk" (that explanation "change in acceleration" is as good as it gets).
And that's the issue.And if Frank chooses to spend his time theorizing about how this idea could be justified in advance of any physical evidence, that's for him to decide.
For what I'm reading you just take over those random ideas while it's obvious you can do perfectly without them (as seen from your workshop photo's for example).
I continuously direct the specific question to Frank/Grimer to explain what he means: He's not able to explain and still talk-talk-talks around the issue (he calls it "smart" for some reason).
I think it's obvious that I was able to bring some order in Frank's own chaos: [link], it apparently doesn't take much to rearange. Perhaps you didn't notice, but he abandoned that 3rd derivative energy idea, ran away, and found himself some new nonsense.
Yes? That's my whole point !?In the meantime, finding any math that has been developed to show how that energy is utilized / produced is very difficult.
So you can not claim you have found "3rd derivative energy" when you don't even know what it should be. Sorry, but the claim of being "difficulty" does not make it truth.
We can simply concluded from all this that Frank/Grimer simply doesn't know... and (for yet another unknown reason) you depend on this guy, so you don't know either.
Perhaps I shouldn't care...
I would be happy to explain what kind of math is involved and point-out several situation where Frank/Grimer likely got confused; but I would rob him from his own challenge.
I'll just finish-up with the revelation that, contrary to the nonsense beliefs of Grimer, this "Jerk" you talked about yourself works perfectly fine in just a single dimension and is totally independent of ones occupation. So yes you are correct in stating that "jerk" can be simulated, just like "shock" and even higher derivatives...
...and mind here that this talk about "jerk" (as being a third-derivative of position) is of an entirely different order of complexity what Grimer tried to put on his "third-derivative energy" plate.