Gravity is a push

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Vic Hays
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:10 am
Location: Montana
Contact:

Re: re: Gravity is a push

Post by Vic Hays »

Michael wrote:Gravity is instantanious. What is meant is gravity does not - cannot, pull mass faster than the speed of light. Light consists basic components. All of matter can be reduced to these components. These components are traveling their fastest when in the form of light. Therefore it is argued that mass cannot travel faster than this. The question is why? One of the answers clearly indicates that the components of light and matter are actually interrelated to, and part of a medium. Velocity equals resistance against this medium, therefore a speed limit. This medium has been called the aether. It is now called the superstratuum. The structure is unknown. There are different theories. One is Quantuum mechanics. Something Einstein helped to invent but thought it not really correct. The current yet incomplete is superstring theory. Incomplete because it does not quite work. When one area gets fixed another breaks apart. Another question that comes up is, is it possible to bundle these components in such a way that it offers no resistance to this medium? In other words, becomes seperated from it.
Does faster than light speed equal time travel? No. At least I don't think so. How could it?

Reg.

Mike

Johnathan posted that Newton explained that space and time were absolute. If space is absolute, then it has to be made out of something. Quantum shift or travel breaks matter free from space and allows instantaneous travel or at least many times the speed of light. I am going to search for the quantum transport article.
Vic Hays

Ambassador MFG LLC
Vic Hays
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:10 am
Location: Montana
Contact:

re: Gravity is a push

Post by Vic Hays »

This is a nifty site

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/louis.savain ... /nasty.htm

Quantum Nonlocality and Nonspatiality

In the early eighties physicist Alain Aspect and colleagues performed an experiment that confirmed the so-called Bell's Inequality Principle. Without going into the details of the experiment, I'll just say that it proved a major prediction of quantum theory, one that Einstein objected to in a famous paper describing a thought experiment that became known as the EPR (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen) paradox. Two entangled photons can be millions of miles apart and yet, if the polarity of one photon flips, the other will flip simultaneously. To a lot of classical physicists such as Einstein, the existence of nonlocal phenomena would mean that the two photons are communicating at superluminal speeds which is a no-no. Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance." Many have refused to accept the completeness and even the correctness of QM for this reason. But the superluminal objection is flawed in my opinion, because it assumes the physical existence of space.

As soon as one realizes that there is no space then it is easy to see that there is no superluminal or any sort of communication taking place between the entangled photons. Particles do not exist in space, they just exist. There is no spooky action at a distance because there is no distance between particles. This is not the same as saying that the distance is zero; distance simply does not exist: it is abstract. More precisely, it is the abstract vector difference between two positional properties. The entangled polarities are facets of the same coin. In other words, nonlocality is equivalent to nonspatiality. Nature is able to apply its principles of conservation "everywhere" because the universe is one. Not one in the sense of a single point or location (there is no location) but one in the sense of yin-yang complementarity.
Vic Hays

Ambassador MFG LLC
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Gravity is a push

Post by iacob alex »

.....or an omnidirectional "fluidic" pressure , as you can read about the old theory , at : www.mathpages.com/home/kmath131/kmath131.htm
Many things difficult to explain ( theorize...) prove easy to perform...
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
Post Reply