Qvo Vadis?!

[Senax]

Cool I did no know the Steorn company were into concrete are you a director?

Putting that to one side; where it takes you is the knowledge that concrete that is not under
compression is dangerous and structurally weak.

One does not have to be a director to know that now.

I am not a director and the Steorn company (deceased) were not into concrete.

But then of course you can't be serious if having read the paper you think it's
importance is about the properties of concrete.

The conference member who thought the paper was a hoax understood its
relevance - which is why he thought it must be a hoax of course.

[WaltzCee]

. . .
I was told 'Perception makes Reality'.

There are many things that can be perceived when turning mathematics around.

. . .

They lied to you. Case in point, if you take Bessler's word in this matter, perpetual motion
is possible (in the classical sense). On the other hand, if you take the physicist/ mathematicians
word about reality, Bessler was talking out his backside.


Does reality switch back and forth depending on who's looking at it? I don't think so.
There are many things that can be perceived when you're dropping acid, I've been told.
Whatever you think, don't think you can fly. Flying is one thing, landing is another.


Beware of the sudden stop at the bottom.

[agor95]

Well all that work you did is well into the passed.

Time to move on.

All the Best

[agor95]

Does reality switch back and forth depending on who's looking at it? I don't think so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_dress

Think again

All the Best

[murilo]

Yes, alex is from another country but now lives in the USA. English is not his native lanquage. His punctuation is horrible and makes his posts painful to read. But he now hits the return key at the end of sentences which makes his posts almost bearable. He is quite intelligent but his poor writing skills make him seem not so. I suggest we cut him a little slack and try to understand what he's trying to say, OK?

Hi, JIM!!!
I still miss u, JIM!!!!
Go for it!
Best of best!
M

[WaltzCee]

Perceptions are the variables, reality is the constant.

If you think otherwise, it's probably pointless for you to think again.

[agor95]

One could say there is 'subjective reality' and 'objective reality'.

I think the only one form of constant reality and that is in the form of a mathematical proof.

We can all agree - I hope - 'subjective reality' is the perception form.

The problem with 'objective reality' is the objects.
There is uncertainty with their existence [location and speed].

However that is the best we can get and we should move on.

All the best.

[WaltzCee]

We can all agree - I hope - 'subjective reality' is the perception form.

Some people are psychotic. They live in a reality has nothing to do with reality.
I have nothing against crazy people, or you agor, until they want me to live in their reality.
That's when we have problems.

There it just got perfect. Now we can move on.

[ovyyus]

I have nothing against crazy people, or you agor, until they want me to live in their reality.
That's when we have problems.

Crazy people wanting others to live in their reality is the problem and the scourge of religious belief. Is there a better example of the confusion between subjective and objective reality?

[ME]

Crazy people wanting others to live in their reality is the problem and the scourge of religious belief. Is there a better example of the confusion between subjective and objective reality?

The most confusing part is that crazy people think they are the most normal in the whole universe.

For the rest there's something like "culture", "justice" and "people's rights" that may obstruct feelings of entitlement.
At least objectively different, but who's to say if it's better.

I personally think it would be a great start if one contemplates how one's action and opportunities would affect oneself when mirrored, reversed and reflected back.
At first glance such seems good for Culture, Justice, People's Rights, and perhaps (how will we ever know?) that even the Gods would approve.

But what solution is there when a dropped weight appears to float for some crazy observer?
Do you catch such observer, or should he crash?

[raj]

CRAZY people?

How do one define " Crazy"?

On the wrong side of the fine line dividing madness from genius?

Raj

[ME]

But what solution is there when a dropped weight appears to float for some crazy observer?
Do you catch such observer, or should he crash?

...and then the "crazy" person remarks over the walky that it was you who refused a parachute.

[ovyyus]

On the wrong side of the fine line dividing madness from genius?

Where is the line when both want you to live in their subjective reality?

[Calloway]

Maybe this would help...imo. It's a good read anyhow. Cheers

https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Biocentri ... 1543619622

[agor95]

Calloway thank you for the link.

I recommend we all live in the reality of our own making; as first person direct experience.

Then you will not be forced into anyone's reality other than your own.

As to our indirect experience the scientific method is better than nothing.

Choose the world you want to live in and support others.

Cheers