Simple Explanation. For a simple explanation, please read the three consecutive paragraphs at https://gravity-wheel.neocities.org/ namely: Smallest Building Blocks of All Matter, What Might Gravity Be?, and Bessler Principle. Then look at the following three figures after those three paragraphs, which figures are somewhat like the three figures 25, 26, and 27 of Chapter 3 of my book GWU (pages 69 and 70).
Geometry. Then about six paragraphs down, beyond those three paragraphs and those three figures at https://gravity-wheel.neocities.org/, I then show after the paragraph Geometry in Orffyrean Roller Bearings a couple of figures. The first figure allows calculations of the geometry of the Orffyrean roller bearings and the second figure shows what the Orffyrean roller bearings looks like prior to the formation of the tiny surface lobes and lobe holes.
If those three or four paragraphs are not enough elaboration, then recall that above (Tue 30 Apr, 2019 11:06 am) I wrote
Chapters 2 and 3. Chapter 2 covers pp. 45 to 67 and Chapter 3 covers pp. 67 to 76. That is 23 pages for Chapter 2 and 10 pages for Chapter 3. There would be a total of 32 pages. Starting with the two final summary section paragraphs, one could just read any other paragraphs that one is interested in reading. Since I give titles to the sections and the most important paragraphs in my book, one could just skip over the portions that one doesn’t care about. I should emphasize though that there is a quantum condition for the formation of the graviton and a quantum condition for the annihilation of the discrete quantum graviton. That is why the graviton is so weak relative to the two unpaired discrete electric fields that constitute it. Again one could start with the summary section paragraphs prior to considering portions of the chapters that may be of further interest. The two summary section paragraphs (on p. 67 and p. 76) are 2.4 Summary of “GRAVITY BASED ON DISCRETE ELECTRIC FIELDS� and 3.4 Summary of “BESSLER’S PRINCIPLE�. I tried to write my book so that if the summaries are good enough one can just consider them and one might only need to dig further into the book, if one wants more information.AldenPark wrote:For more elaboration please read Chapter 2 “GRAVITY BASED ON DISCRETE ELECTRIC FIELDS� and Chapter 3 “BESSLER’S PRINCIPLE� of my book GWU, which (latest 18 March 2019 version) you can download its .pdf file for free.
The higher and lower elevations are on a very tiny scale (and at nearly the same time). See the figures 25, 26, and 27 of Chapter 3 of my book GWU (pages 69 and 70).
Nearly Frictionless Environment. Many satellites in a nearly frictionless environment of space begin to tumble or spin out of control, faster and faster, unless there is something to actively counter the growth of such rotations. See pp. 138-139 of my book, GWU. Many scientists just seem to scratch their heads with lack of understanding about the situations or just ignore the situations. Still such out-of-control tumbling is not much different than the results of the 1968 McKinley low-friction-demonstration, which acted very much qualitatively like a modern-day Bessler wheel. It would keep rotating (and creating some wind that is thrown outward perpetually) as long as you keep the lead cold enough so that it remains superconducting. The wheel in the McKinley low friction demonstration increased in angular speed (starting at nearly zero angular speed initially, when the bearing formed by total exclusion of the magnetic fields within the superconductor) until there was equilibrium with the air friction. There was not even an initial push by someone to get the wheel rotating for the McKinley low friction demonstration.
Increasing Internal Rotational Kinetic Energy. Whenever there is internal rotational kinetic energy (for rotations about horizontal axes) there is an increase in internal rotational kinetic energy due to the two-part pull-downs of nearly each graviton. If the internal rotational friction in a rotating wheel, which removes a part of the internal rotational kinetic energy, can be reduced so low that the portion of the internal rotational kinetic energy which is removed by friction is less than the amount of the internal rotational kinetic energy added by the Bessler principle, then the rotating wheel will increase in its angular speed until there is equilibrium or the situation is rotationally out of control.
Two Main Approaches to Perpetual Rotational Motion. There are two main approaches to the production of perpetual mechanical internal rotation. The first is the direct approach that Bessler used. Bessler reduced friction sufficiently for particular angular speeds. He would have not attained it on his own but he obtained assistance from God in the form of “a strangely invigorating dream�. See p. 29 of PM97. Given Bessler’s solution, I took my best guess (see pp. 524-525 of GWU) at reconstructing the dream, which Bessler received from God that explained how he could asymmetrically build up the finest steel lobe holes, while he concurrently dug out his finest steel lobe-holes to form the surfaces of his bearings. Bessler had done a great amount of work to get to where he was at. He just needed to know how to break the symmetry in the formation of his ultra-low-friction huge-load-carrying bearings. The second approach consists of the methods that Leedskalnin and Papp used in their own particular physical domains, to increase the effect of the energy productive Bessler principle by having large internal angular speeds. The effect of the Bessler principle increases in energy production as angular speed is increased. The reason for that is simple enough. At larger angular speeds, the higher elevation mass (on the opposite side of the circle from the lower elevation mass) goes further around the circle, after the time of the lower elevation pull-down, until the higher elevation mass is pulled down, thus creating greater torque for rotationally speeding up the pair. Edward Leedskalnin increased angular speed so that the Bessler principle produced more internal rotational kinetic energy than was used by frictional forces at such angular speeds, which removed internal rotational kinetic energy. The energy production was produced in the low-air-friction fast-small-massive daughter-cylinder and then the produced rotational kinetic energy was transferred (by means of extremely low friction) to the larger mother and father cylinders. Still, Leedskalnin warned that the angular speed must not be so large that it destroyed the rotational connections between the internal rotating nuclear-ground-states and the surrounding lattice. Papp greatly increased angular speed so that the Bessler principle produced more internal rotational kinetic energy than was used by frictional forces at such huge angular speeds, which removed internal rotational kinetic energy. Josef or Joseph Papp Jr. didn’t need to worry about the rotational connections between the internal rotating nuclear-ground-states and the surrounding lattice, because he used individual nuclei or atoms of hydrogen (the nucleus with the greatest ratio of nuclear magnetic moment to moment of inertia) gas which protons could not be rotationally ripped apart, as evidenced by the hydrogen nuclei being extremely rapidly rotated at the far edges of the solar corona (and delivering mysterious extremely energetic photons when electrons were attracted to such rotating nuclear-ground-states). Papp used noble gas to rotationally moderate his system. If he had too much rotation, he could have a runaway explosion, as happened on purpose a couple of times. AEP – 3 May 2019