A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

[spinner361]

@Geroge1: Are you getting impatient with others giving their opinion? Are you frustrated?

It seems like no one understands it enough to give a yes or no. Maybe replace all of the variables in the equation with actual numbers, then explain the actual numbers with a scenario and how the values are derived and what they represent and why. It seems apparent to me that your formulas aren't making sense to anyone, and some are saying that you're wrong. Maybe adjust your communication style. If it's everyone else's fault, who's fault is it?

To me, formulas without concrete examples mean nothing to me. I don't comprehend what you're saying. I read your posts and it's like: words words blah blah blah words words blah blah blah. Do you want to be taken seriously? It's up to you. Are you trying to communicate?

Maybe you're just so smart that no one can understand you. Is that a good thing? Maybe try to be dumb and show everyone how smart you are. It may serve your purpose much better. Your posts that repeatedly ask questions for answers are kind of painful to read. I feel so sorry for you. I really do. What is it that you're hoping to accomplish here? For me, I go for shortest route to success when it comes to communication, and I work on this really hard. It may seem like the longer route, but it saves a lot of time overall, and a lot of frustration.

But maybe, I'm just a dumb guy and everything I say should be disregarded. If so, carry on. Best wishes.

[Tarsier79]

Spinner, maybe the problem is not lack of understanding on our end.

[spinner361]

@Tarsier79: Maybe. That's a possibility. I'm not sure. Without being stepped through a scenario, I won't know. Maybe, if he explains it better, people can help him adjust his formulas so everything makes sense.

It's just so painful to read his repeated demands stated as questions for compliance.

[Tarsier79]

Let me explain his formula in laymans terms:

"I invented a formula.
7 = 7 + 2
My formula proves math is wrong!
I have invented over-unity"

[spinner361]

@Tarsier79: That was a really good laugh for whole minute. Maybe we'll get a better explanation now.

[Tarsier79]

It would be laughable if it wasn't the truth. That was an actual description of his formula.

[George1]

To spinner361.
To Tarsier79.
--------------------------------------
(I would not be surprised if these two pseudonims are used by one and same person.)
--------------------------------------
It is absolutely evident for all members of this forum that you have no reasonable arguments against the validity of our water-splitting electrolysis OU concept. Your masters will not pay you your month salary and they may even beat you because you keep failing in your desperate and clumsy attempts to reject obvious truths.
---------------------------------------
It is absolutely evident also that all members of this forum are severely tired of your dully repetitive, amateur and clumsy manipulation tricks. You have to change your repertoire. Use more creative and more variegated manipulation methods. Because otherwise you become a laughing-stock.
----------------------------------------
Read carefully the text below. I hope you will understand it at once. But if not, then I will explain it again as you tend to understand simple things with great difficulty.
-----------------------------------------
1) I am asking you a question: Are you a human being? Yes or no?
Your answer will be "Yes" for sure.
-----------------------------------------
2) I am asking you a question: Are you a donkey? Yes or no?
Your answer will be "No" for sure.
-----------------------------------------
Did you understand well the text above? Shall I repeat it again?
-----------------------------------------
Let us go on with our story.
-----------------------------------------
3) I am asking you a question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
What is your answer? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!!! Can't you understand this simple requirement???!!!

[Leafy]

Hi George1,

Instead of calculating electrolytes heating through IV, why not experimentally get the answer through heat capacity and temperature. That way no one can argue.

[MrTim]

He won't do that, it costs money. He'll ask for some soon to experimentally build his "proof", because his efforts to fool us into agreeing with him aren't working. Even his OFFER of millions fell as flat as his credibility... ;-)

[George1]

To Leafy.
--------------------------
Hi Leafy,
Thank you for your reply.
Whatever experiments to do professional haters and rejectors in this forum will declare the experimental results false for sure.

[George1]

To Mr Tim, to Tarsier79 and to the other similar people in this forum.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1) Answer the question: Are you a human being? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
2) Answer the question: Are you a donkey? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
3) Answer the question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no? Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
4) A piece of ABSOLUTELY FREE technology breakthrogh information! And no public recognition within a period of many months! Absurd and ridiculous discussions within a period of many months for clarifying of simple obvious truths! This is a comedy! Tell your masters that our third piece of EXPERIMENTALLY PROVED technology breakthrough, which increases many times (twice as a minimum and more than 15 times as a maximum) the capacity of any standard electric battery, costs already $100,000,000! And each month this price will be increased with $10,000,000, that is, after one month the price will be $110,000,000, after two months the price will be $120,000,000, etc.

[George1]

To Mr Tim, to Tarsier79 and to the other similar people in this forum.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Answer the question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
All good will members of this forum are looking forward to your answer.

[Leafy]

I want to hear more about how you increased battery capacity. How it works?

[WaltzCee]

I think tax policy makers around the world have been using that formula or some variant of it for a very long time.

[George1]

To Mr Tim, to Tarsier79 and to the other similar people in this forum.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Answer the question: Do you have any theoretical (only theoretical!) objections against Prof. S. L. Srivastava's solution? Yes or no?
Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!
All good will members of this forum are looking forward to your answer.