A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
User avatar
MrTim
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:05 pm
Location: "Excellent!" Besslerwheel.com's C. Montgomery Burns
Contact:

Re: re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency great

Post by MrTim »

PeterAX wrote:To MrTim and Tarsier79.
---------------------------------------------------------------
1) A standard DC water-splitting electrolysis process takes place in your laboratory.
2) A direct current I flows through the electrolyte. This direct current I is equal to 1A, that is, I = 1A. (This is the reading of your standard working DC ammeter.)
3) The Ohmic resistance R of the electrolyte is equal to 1Ohm, that is, R = 1Ohm. (This is the reading of your standard working DC ohmmeter.)
---------------------------------------------------------------
I am asking you PERSONALLY my question for the 4th time: How many Joules of heat per second (J/s) does the electrolyte absorb from the external environment?
---------------------------------------------------------------
All members of this forum are looking forward to your PERSONAL answer for the 4th time.
Here is your FINAL and PERSONAL answer:

As listed on one of the sources on page 13, the efficiency of electrolysis is 87%. Therefore your equation is missing an important factor, corrected here:

(I = 1A) x .87 , meaning your efficiency is LESS THAN 1

In the future, when you present your equations, please include the efficiency of the electrolysis (x .87) in your calculations.
Failure to do so will result in your flawed arguments/results being ignored, so please quit wasting our time...
"....the mechanism is so simple that even a wheel may be too small to contain it...."
"Sometimes the harder you look the better it hides." - Dilbert's garbageman
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5139
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Tarsier79 »

Excellent suggestion Mr Tim.
User avatar
WaltzCee
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Huntsville, TX
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by WaltzCee »

Maybe for their next trick they'll pull quarters out our ears . . .

ETA:
Mr Tim wrote:(I = 1A) x .87 , meaning your efficiency is LESS THAN 1
I would not mean to insult you, but you really are an obtuse asshole.
Last edited by WaltzCee on Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
........................¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

To MrTim.
------------------------------
I would not like to insult you, but you are really an ignoramus in the field of electric engineering!
------------------------------
Can you explain to all of us here in this forum what represents this EXTREMELY STRANGE mathematical expression "(I = 1A) x .87"? What is this? Current? Energy? Power? Something else?
Last edited by PeterAX on Thu Feb 11, 2021 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Asking the same simple question for the 5th time: If I = 1A and if R = 1Ohm, then how many Joules of heat per second (J/s) does the electrolyte absorb from the external environment?
WRITE DOWN THE NUMBER OF JOULES! How many Joules? 1 Joule? 2 Joules? 3 Joules? 0 Joules? How many Joules?
Looking forward to your answer for the 5th time.
Leafy
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 785
Joined: Sat May 02, 2020 5:40 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Leafy »

If you insist that the electrolyte absorb 1J/s, then the solution would not gain any heat. But the video I shown have a temperature dropped. How would you explain this?
User avatar
WaltzCee
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Huntsville, TX
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by WaltzCee »

I think I know, Leafy.

Image
Attachments
George1.jpg
........................¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5139
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Tarsier79 »

OK. My understanding:

You supply an amount of power to the system.

Assuming the efficiency of electrolysis is 87%, that amount of power will be used directly for Hydrogen + oxygen production. The additional 13% will be divided in inefficiencies such as heat (the Joule effect), plus other reactions that occur depending on the electrolyte which may additionally produce or absorb heat.

Because electrolysis of water is an endothermic reaction, energy is pulled from the "heat" of the water. This cools the water to create Hydrogen and Oxygen. To me this also could mean that if your electrolysis was 100% efficient, and you could extract hydrogen heat at 100%, you could theoretically get an energy gain. This is because you use ambient temperature as an energy source.

The more inefficient your system, the more heat is produced.
I am asking my question for the 4th time: If I = 1A and if R = 1Ohm, then how many Joules of heat per second (J/s) does the electrolyte absorb from the external environment?
WRITE DOWN THE NUMBER OF JOULES!
Looking forward to your answer for the 4th time.
I cannot answer the question more simply. You have not given enough information. Even if you did, I do not understand the math enough, nor wish to spend the time to. I have an excerpt from the website I have already pointed out:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/en ... c-reaction

It doesn't answer the heat required per L of Hydrogen.
Attachments
Endothermic.JPG
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

To Leafy.
----------------------------------
A possible explanation could be for example either an unintentional or (most probably!) an intentional experimental error. Because many people (like Tarsier79 for example) do their best to save the law of conservation of energy. 
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

To Tarsier79.
------------------------------
You demonstrate again a shocking ignorance!
------------------------------
You have copied blindly a certain formula without understanding its essence! This formula does not contain (as its components) direct current I and Ohmic resistance R, you ignoramus! (Please excuse me, if I have insulted you. I am ready to apologize.) 
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

1) Asking the same simple question for the 6th time: If I = 1A and if R = 1Ohm, then how many Joules of heat per second (J/s) does the electrolyte absorb from the external environment? WRITE DOWN THE NUMBER OF JOULES!
------------------------------------------------------------
2) Besides how does this heat (which is absorbed each second by the electrolyte) depend on direct current I and on Ohmic resistance R? WRITE DOWN A FORMULA! 
------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 6th time.
Robinhood46
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1671
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:22 am
Location: Lot, France

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Robinhood46 »

Waltzcee,
That looks like a good idea, if i could make a suggestion, maybe if you were to use a magical energy combiner you could increase the output.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

1) Asking the same simple question for the 7th time: If I = 1A and if R = 1Ohm, then how many Joules of heat per second (J/s) does the electrolyte absorb from the external environment? WRITE DOWN THE NUMBER OF JOULES!
------------------------------------------------------------
2) Besides how does this heat (which is absorbed each second by the electrolyte) depend on direct current I and on Ohmic resistance R? WRITE DOWN A FORMULA!
------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 7th time.
Leafy
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 785
Joined: Sat May 02, 2020 5:40 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Leafy »

You’re asking people to choose your theory over experiment result. Don’t you think that is unfair?
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5139
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by Tarsier79 »

Besides how does this heat (which is absorbed each second by the electrolyte) depend on direct current I and on Ohmic resistance R? WRITE DOWN A FORMULA!
Ha ha, and I am the ignorant one.
You have copied blindly a certain formula without understanding its essence!This formula does not contain (as its components) direct current I and Ohmic resistance R, you ignoramus! (Please excuse me, if I have insulted you. I am ready to apologize.)
Its essence is there is an energy balance.

I am not insulted, nor do I need of an apology from someone who has to pretend he has a "team" and pretends to have understanding of electrical, chemical and mechanical engineering because he took general science in junior high.
Post Reply