Donald Trump 2016?

[ME]

Watching President Biden's confusion in Texas ,you have to question is he fit for his position....sad really..

Reading that gaslighting comment, you have to question if he has anything insightful to add....sad really..

IOW, please elaborate:
- What did you see;
- Give us your summary what it was all about;
- What sort of confusion did you notice;
- What do you thing that was probably intended;
- What makes him unfit in your opinion;

[rasselasss]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/14 ... wsource=cl

[daxwc]

Who is running the USA; its not Biden.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/white-hou ... -questions

[daxwc]

Me:

rasselasss wrote:
Watching President Biden's confusion in Texas ,you have to question is he fit for his position....sad really..

Reading that gaslighting comment, you have to question if he has anything insightful to add....sad really..

You would know if you didn’t indoctrinate yourself with only liberal news and found a more balanced approach… sad really. 8P

[ME]

I was asking how rasselass personally came to his conclusion instead if just posting some accusation.
Probably he has no arguments other than that article-title.
And thus my conclusion about rasselass stands on equal grounds.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/14 ... wsource=cl

I really see that clip for the first time, because Biden is gloriously boring and not some selfcentered sociopath we all have to watch out for...
I see Biden putting out policy with arguments instead of playing some unfounded blame game we heard too often during the previous four years.

This is what I see in the video: The video shows us Biden thanking many people by name and function from the top of his head. Some he probably never saw before and will never see again.
I'm no Biden-expert but the phrase: "what am I doing here" seems like his recall-association-trick, and fails for a bit, before looking at his paper.
What's the big deal?

Compare: "Person-Woman-Man-Camera-TV" and thinking yourself a genius.

bla bla bla ...prejudges: indoctrinate yourself with only liberal news

You can just look at live-footage without any opinionated underscore, they are often all bad.

But you think your 'source' of so-called outrage is well balanced?

Fox News ..
- has been the subject of many controversies and allegations.
- being biased in favor of the Republican Party in its news coverage
- perpetuating more general views of a conservative bias.
- acknowledging their opinion programming is not intended to be neutral

Anywho, Fox: Biden slams Texas, Mississippi for COVID reopening measures
Maybe this video is missing from Fox? Because I didn't see a feed being cut. Maybe Fox cut it themselves?

So here's a video answering questions after the 'Missisippi'-interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc36VcGyP8
As far as I notice he makes statistically and scientifically proven arguments why reopening is bad instead of brainlessly ignore consequences: iow that Neaderthal-argument.

Sorry for this long reply: Opinionated accusation produces much shorter catch phrases you can repeat without giving it any thought.

[daxwc]

ME:

But you think your 'source' of so-called outrage is well balanced?

I have told you before I read about 5 to 10 different newspapers that range from Huffpost to Breitbart everyday, but then again you are better at listening to yourself talk. You wouldn’t have to ask the issue in such a demeaning tone to Rasselass if you knew the issues. No one newspaper has the whole news.

I was asking how rasselass personally came to his conclusion instead if just posting some accusation.
Probably he has no arguments other than that article-title.
And thus my conclusion about rasselass stands on equal grounds.

You are like a cat burying turds in the litter box that has eaten a box of Ex-lax.

Anywho, Fox: Biden slams Texas, Mississippi for COVID reopening measures
Maybe this video is missing from Fox? Because I didn't see a feed being cut. Maybe Fox cut it themselves?

Seriously as if the MSM wouldn’t be all over that. It would take you 2 seconds on the internet to confirm it. Here is the leftist Newsweek just for you.
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-whit ... es-1573688

As far as I notice he makes statistically and scientifically proven arguments why reopening is bad instead of brainlessly ignore consequences: iow that Neaderthal-argument.

Yes he is doing a great job. They went from Trump calling people names to Biden calling people names when they don’t get what they want.

[ME]

Sigh.
And still, to refocus on why I replied initially, Rasselass and his source base those accusation -as made- on nothing.
Hence I can make the same argument about Rasselass, that's all.

It is the kind of so-called "argumentation"-style I'm pointing out here.
It seems very 'modern' and the right-wing thing to do.
I ask for his argumentation not for second-hand opinions. You're not adding arguments either, yet come up with some MSM stuff.
Like I said, I didn't follow any of this - I just noticed the argumentation style and asked for clarification.
Your reaction is not helping either, which tactic is (I have to say) perfectly summarized by:

You are like a cat burying turds in the litter box that has eaten a box of Ex-lax.

Either it shows you're very well informed or you are deflecting the arguments I made by applying it yourself.

So let me not return the favor and, all poop creativity aside, let's continue with your wedged-in Fox-story for whichever additional non-argument you're trying to make.
You say you read all kinds of opinionated (mainstream) newspapers and still came up with some half-baked Fox-article and now with some Newsweek cut-and-paste video that's a summary of... what exactly? The hear-say opinions that follows?
Please stop, I don't care about those and theatrical fake outrage.

So out of curiosity, and 5 seconds search, I found this.
No comments, no opinions, just footage.
I skipped through it: It looks like some boring policy-summary for Democrats, a bit similar to what the Republicans did a while back (right?)-
I wouldn't watch that back-slapping stuff from both of them willingly.
Yet from what I've glanced at least he didn't blame or shame anyone or made some other baseless 'modern' suggestion.

Thus for you the same question (attempt): What's your summary of that event?
And, what questions would you have asked about what was said: please reference the timing of the video so I may look it up.

Here's the video;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeDGfO9Vrgk
(The cut is at 17:30)

[daxwc]

Double Sigh.
The issue is obviously the White House has no confidence in Biden even taking softball questions from the press, therefore cuts his television feed to the mass public. There is no question in any newspaper that reported it that the feed was cut. I never said anything about the speech itself.


In Rasselass’s issue it starts at :20 into the video till the end.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/14 ... wsource=cl
Biden is showing obvious signs of dementia as remember he was a politician his whole life. His election campaign went from basement hiding to his handlers now in the White House having no confidence in letting him take press questions. The double standard is astounding by the main stream media. Harris seems to have taken over being President on foreign policy. I predict Biden isn’t going to make it his full term. It will come out he has some mental or age issue and he will hand the presidency over to Harris. I really don’t care, but the MSM double standard isn’t going to go unnoticed by the general public. He hasn't held one press conference since taking office and the media is ignoring that too.


But since we are here:

As far as I notice he makes statistically and scientifically proven arguments why reopening is bad instead of brainlessly ignore consequences: iow that Neaderthal-argument

.
https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2014/0 ... -anything/
You will have to read the article and connect the dots, you seem intelligent enough; try not make up a condescending laundry list for me. 8P
Before you start the science dogma followed by the new religion's mantra of "believe all science", remember who you are addressing; we are not going to believe it that you actually believe it. Even though double standards is a very modern left-wing in high regard thing to do.

[daxwc]

47 days and counting. Pretty bad when even CNN notices. Still not super bad yet at reading the teleprompter.

https://www.rt.com/usa/517538-biden-no- ... questions/

[ME]

Daxw, you also show some obvious signs of certain things when connecting the dots....
Ok, I'll not laundry-list them.
I'll also not start to explain to you the difference between scientism and scientific data.

It happens everywhere, but especially at your side of the pond, people really like to make assumptions and then run off with the preliminary hypotheticals.
(A tiny bit of applied science could really help to smarten-up that Neanderthal-thinking. But, "communism")

As long as Biden is able to keep the team together he was chosen to manage and only stumbles when he thanks them, then that's all fine by me.
And it should be fine for most Americans, because he still seems to care about y'all and actually tries something.
Sure you may not agree with certain thing, but that's the 'winner-takes-all'-politics.
If this dementia is really all you worry about then isn't that a sign that things go great!
Look at the bright side, with dementia, he might even care twice!!

And sure it could very well be that the US gets a first female president.
For those who eventually predicted that correctly: Congratulations, have a lolly at your own cost!

All still much better than some antisocial game-show-host who cons his way through business, blatantly stokes and blames others to mask his newest screw-up of the week, and visibly only cares for the show and not the leadership.
(If only you guys could distinguish socialism and social programs...)

[daxwc]

Yes it is much better to have this the real Biden. Good selection America.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DbE2SmV2bs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pgG9mDxRNQ

Second thought I will take the “antisocial game-show-host who cons his way through business�

[daxwc]

ME Quote:

(If only you guys could distinguish socialism and social programs...)

If only you could realise USA can not do what Holland is doing.

50% of Americans pay no taxes. There is no way they can police force the world and be who they are now. They have essentially had the border open for decades using illegal aliens as legalized slave labour and it actually only drives down wages and hurts the poor although the poor can’t seem to recognise that, but it produces a massive economic engine.

Canada has been riding on USA coattails since the 50’s and not paying its share into NATO. Netherlands also doesn’t pay its fair share but are happy shelter under the American safety umbrella sit in the top stands and become the peanut gallery. While actually they are using them as a crutch both militarily and economically. Ask yourself if the rest of the world didn’t come to your call of need in WW2 would you be better off today?

So it is obvious to me people are trying to get into to their country not fleeing it; that alone should tell you something. I am sure the sick and the poor in the USA would happily take the Netherlands money for what you actually owe them for your lifestyle, social programs in the pecking order in the world.

[rasselasss]

Trawling through the main media outlets not one has anything good to say about Donald Trump's four years as President ...nothing at all about his foreign policies...he had the balls to meet Kim(north korea) to try and negotiate with him....to withdraw U.S. soldiers from countries with never ending conflicts ...to stand up against Iran and China and Russian aggression against their neighbours and the west....forcing the other countries in NATO to pay their fair share for membership....on the homeland front illegal immigrants from Mexico (which Biden is struggling with now having overturned Trumps efforts to stem it)....lastly withdrawing from climate change body which is unrealistic to achieve and is wrecking world economies (car manufactors are struggling right now)he recognised technology is not up to speed and won't be for many many years...to ban petrol/diesel the implications are enormous ...trains,ships,planes ....truthfully not sustainable or realistic .....he did'nt even take a salary for his tenure....Now off to hide again before ME gives me another avalanche of questions...

[raj]

I made the 15th post on the first page of this thread.
I stand by what I said then.

[daxwc]

Big news: Biden’s dog attacked security in the White House. If it was your dog it would be put down but this one is going in for mental stress removal. What will the MSM ogle over now that pets are a hot potato? He never did fulfill the promise of a cat.

I wonder if Trump acquired German Shepherds and brought them to the White House what the headlines would be…