IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?
Moderator: scott
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
Hi Georg,
1) My last post was about the Papp machine and not about the Hyperdrive. But never mind, both machines are interesting enough.
2) A few words about the picture you have sent? Seems to be very interesting. Some more explanations about the principle of operation of this device?
1) My last post was about the Papp machine and not about the Hyperdrive. But never mind, both machines are interesting enough.
2) A few words about the picture you have sent? Seems to be very interesting. Some more explanations about the principle of operation of this device?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 12:22 pm
- Location: Speyer, Germany
- Contact:
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
the internal constructiopn you can see under
http://kuenstler-energie.de/index.php?id=35
There a pendulums on a ring.
The ring is powered so that centrifugal force will act.
The cam disc is the disturber of the movement, creating the perturbance force. This will force the pendulums to swing inwards.
It creates an periodic ice scater effect, living of the resistance of the cam disk.
Outer ring with the pendulums and inner cam disk will rotate in the same direction. You can control the periodic swinging by controlling the relative speed difference
http://kuenstler-energie.de/index.php?id=35
There a pendulums on a ring.
The ring is powered so that centrifugal force will act.
The cam disc is the disturber of the movement, creating the perturbance force. This will force the pendulums to swing inwards.
It creates an periodic ice scater effect, living of the resistance of the cam disk.
Outer ring with the pendulums and inner cam disk will rotate in the same direction. You can control the periodic swinging by controlling the relative speed difference
Best regards
Georg
Georg
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To Georg Kunstler.
----------------------------
Hi Georg,
Thanks a lot for your reply. Please give me some time to consider carefully your last post. I will write to you in the nearest future.
-------------------
Regards,
----------------------------
Hi Georg,
Thanks a lot for your reply. Please give me some time to consider carefully your last post. I will write to you in the nearest future.
-------------------
Regards,
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
@ The Papp engine:
Seams like plugin it back in like that, caused the explosion. Maybe all four cylinders fired at once, some how.
Maybe it would make a better bomb than an engine-------------------Sam
Seams like plugin it back in like that, caused the explosion. Maybe all four cylinders fired at once, some how.
Maybe it would make a better bomb than an engine-------------------Sam
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To Sam Peppiatt.
--------------------------------
"Maybe it would make a better bomb than an engine?":) Well said!:)
But how this machine actually works? What is its principle of operation? This is interesting, don't you think so?
--------------------------------
"Maybe it would make a better bomb than an engine?":) Well said!:)
But how this machine actually works? What is its principle of operation? This is interesting, don't you think so?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
PeterAX,
Yes, it's pretty amazing! Supposedly, it had over 700 foot lbs. of torque at about 700 RPM. It was hot Stuff! Maybe a little too hot---------------------
It's like the gas would explode, but didn't burn, how could that be? I have no idea-------------------Sam
Yes, it's pretty amazing! Supposedly, it had over 700 foot lbs. of torque at about 700 RPM. It was hot Stuff! Maybe a little too hot---------------------
It's like the gas would explode, but didn't burn, how could that be? I have no idea-------------------Sam
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To Sam Peppiatt.
----------------------------------
As if they are talking about something like an explosive evaporation of the gases (or something of the sort).
Please have a look at the link https://www.pinterest.com/pin/56295064071726235/
----------------------------------
As if they are talking about something like an explosive evaporation of the gases (or something of the sort).
Please have a look at the link https://www.pinterest.com/pin/56295064071726235/
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To ME.
------------------------------
Hi there,
Still no message from you?
------------------------------
Hi there,
Still no message from you?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
PeterAX,
Yes, I guess that's it, looks to be very low compression maybe 2: 1 , and no valves---------------------Sam
Yes, I guess that's it, looks to be very low compression maybe 2: 1 , and no valves---------------------Sam
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To Sam Peppiatt.
------------------------------
Yeah, and a variety of "strange" components in this engine like high frequency generator and antenna, a bunch of coils, etc. As if some unknown physical effect generates the motion of this machine. Keep studying the diagram in the link.
------------------------------
Yeah, and a variety of "strange" components in this engine like high frequency generator and antenna, a bunch of coils, etc. As if some unknown physical effect generates the motion of this machine. Keep studying the diagram in the link.
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
Some comments, related to our zigzag concept?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
Hi PeterAX!
Yes, some "unknown physical effect". It must be an atomic explosion of the atoms, of some kind. Maybe some form of cold fusion; for want of a better term. Combined with a high frequency generator, (like in a microwave oven), and magnitizoum; fascinating!!
You are a smart guy PeterAX, I know you can figure it out----------------Sam
PS It's too far above my pay grade!
Yes, some "unknown physical effect". It must be an atomic explosion of the atoms, of some kind. Maybe some form of cold fusion; for want of a better term. Combined with a high frequency generator, (like in a microwave oven), and magnitizoum; fascinating!!
You are a smart guy PeterAX, I know you can figure it out----------------Sam
PS It's too far above my pay grade!
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
To Sam Peppiatt.
----------------------------
Hi Sam,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
1) First of all thank you very much for your kind words! It's a real pleasure for me to correspond with you!
2) Secondly, yes, let's say that I have some degree of qualification, it's true. But at the same time I am not actually such a great expert, I still have to learn a lot and still have to qualify further.
3) And thirdly, about the Papp machine. It would be a pleasure for me to study together and understand together its principle of operation. You think that inside the cylinders takes place some kind of (possibly low-temperature) nuclear reaction? (The latter sounds very interesting.)
----------------------------
Hi Sam,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
1) First of all thank you very much for your kind words! It's a real pleasure for me to correspond with you!
2) Secondly, yes, let's say that I have some degree of qualification, it's true. But at the same time I am not actually such a great expert, I still have to learn a lot and still have to qualify further.
3) And thirdly, about the Papp machine. It would be a pleasure for me to study together and understand together its principle of operation. You think that inside the cylinders takes place some kind of (possibly low-temperature) nuclear reaction? (The latter sounds very interesting.)
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1821
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
PeterAX'
I don't know anything. You would do far better, to search Google for technical explanations of the engine. However, I did have a thought. What if the magnetic force of the coils caused the atoms to all line up positive to negative. Unlike polls attract each other, right?
Now the atoms are all very close together, also compressing the gas 2:1 squeeze's them even more. There are different kinds of gas mixed together. Maybe a spark could instantly reverse the polarity of half of the atoms.
Now they all repel each other, violently expanding, causing an explosive effect--------------------------Sam
I don't know anything. You would do far better, to search Google for technical explanations of the engine. However, I did have a thought. What if the magnetic force of the coils caused the atoms to all line up positive to negative. Unlike polls attract each other, right?
Now the atoms are all very close together, also compressing the gas 2:1 squeeze's them even more. There are different kinds of gas mixed together. Maybe a spark could instantly reverse the polarity of half of the atoms.
Now they all repel each other, violently expanding, causing an explosive effect--------------------------Sam
re: IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHI
Hi Sam,
Hi dear colleague,
That's it! You are a genius! Very interesting idea! Need some time to think over it carefully and thoroughly. I'll write to you in the nearest future.
Regards,
Hi dear colleague,
That's it! You are a genius! Very interesting idea! Need some time to think over it carefully and thoroughly. I'll write to you in the nearest future.
Regards,