...and when they come to be placed together, and so arranged one against another that they can never obtain equilibrium, or the punctum quietus which they unceasingly seek in their wonderfully speedy flight, one or other of them must apply its weight at right angles to the axis, which in its turn must also move.
Have you ever tried to SPIN a storkbill...?
And what would be the difference from one 'cross' to several 'crosses'...?
regards ruggero ;-)
Attachments
Contradictions do not exist.
Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises.
You will find that one of them is wrong. - Ayn Rand -
Just know that a mass rotating about a point will slow down the rotation as it moves away from the point and will speed up the rotation as it moves closer to the point. There is nothing to "store".
axel wrote:I have completed the MT137 based side of the wheel. Turns easily.
Now to build the AP wheel based opposite side. My belief is that the AP wheel is the prime mover and shows the bare minimum required for it to work.
axel wrote:I have always looked for something in a prime mover that was balanced 100% of the time, even when it turned over. That when turned over, weights moved, and that's where the power would come from.
You can't lift more weight than what falls down.
I have a way now that does these things to create a force over a distance, yet remain in balance.
It can be done by some one skilled in the art, which might explain why you wouldn't know
a prime mover if it bit you on the asel.
