It's Me

[Tarsier79]

What mechanics does 0/0 relate to? Hang on a sec, I think I know.... Is 0 how much you learn every time you are banned from the site? Is it your ability to let sleeping dogs lie? Is it the worth of your mathematical proof of principle? Or is it the likelihood of your wheel turning by itself?

I pick E. All of the above. If this forum was a person, it would have a DVO out against you. The negativity, harassment, delusion and outright lies you bring to the forum is not a contribution worth having.

[Tarsier79]

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/176344141631561277/

[A_Person]

What mechanics does 0/0 relate to? Hang on a sec, I think I know.... Is 0 how much you learn every time you are banned from the site? Is it your ability to let sleeping dogs lie? Is it the worth of your mathematical proof of principle? Or is it the likelihood of your wheel turning by itself?

I pick E. All of the above. If this forum was a person, it would have a DVO out against you. The negativity, harassment, delusion and outright lies you bring to the forum is not a contribution worth having.

That's what everything is about;

Is it your ability to let sleeping dogs lie?

You guys are sleeping dogs. You just explained everything Tarsier. You don't want to see a working Bessler wheel because you are a sleeping dog. Makes me wonder why you are in a forum meant to realize his work. That's a contradiction and a paradox at the same time.

p.s., answer the math question. Failure to answer it shows the problems in this forum.

[justsomeone]

James, go away, build a working Bessler wheel, no one's stopping you! Prove everyone wrong. Best of luck, but go away, please.

[A_Person]

Passive aggressive. I like that. Someone can explain the math problem. Yet no one has. I gave you guys the answer. Actually I told you how to understand the answer. Walt told me to do the math. So let's do the math, okay? I am agreeing with what Walt said. We'll do the math. It's a simple problem. And if you guys don't understand it, just know I am not the problem.
@justsomeone, the math question is an easy one. Walt wants to do math. Anyone who can't answer it shouldn't be telling me what to do.

[eccentrically1]

Undefined.

[A_Person]

OMG, That is one answer. And for the math problem in question, the definition was changed. It became defined. But you are ahead of the curve.

[A_Person]

@All, if you don't get it, what wasn't said? The math problem and Bessler's wheel might have that in common. If you don't know what wasn't said, then how do you know what you missed? Why I would like a defined answer to the math problem. You need to understand what was not said.

@e1, there are 2 solutions. You understood one of them. It is the 2nd solution that I am asking about. Why you are ahead of the curve. You probably know that with the law of sines that you can have 2 answers but only one will be right. This is basically the same thing. I think you know what I'm talking about. Answers have to be verified. I really don't care to get into a discussion about triangles. I'm trying to keep things simple. And who knows, maybe these guys need to learn some math?

[A_Person]

I'll give you guys the answer. When he changed -square root of 5 to + square root of 5,
and multiplied both the numerator and denominator by that value, the equation went from undefined to defined.
This allows for a value other than 1 which represents undefined. This is so basic and yet everyone missed it. And yet you know how Bessler's wheel worked, right?
Am sorry Walt that you wanted me to do the math. I know it. Have shown it. And yet you did not know this when the calculus originates in algebra. And Walt, you missed this just as your friends did. And yet I am the problem. I understand what's obvious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXnvtZ7V6n0

p.s., if anyone wants to walk through the video and the math, I can do that. It's pretty basic stuff.

[Tarsier79]

If someone tells you the answer will you leave?

[John Collins]

He’s gone, thank you Scott. 👏

JC

[WaltzCee]

@All, I have sent a mathematical proof to someone at Utrecht University. Their engineers will need to accept that Bessler was successful and I am not a fraud. This is because if what I am working on now is successful then Utrecht University can say they will plan a showing featuring Bessler's book and my work. Without verification from their engineers, then their university's credibility could be damaged. So they will need to say they do understand it and possibly have verified it themselves.

https://www.uu.nl/en/utrecht-university ... nn-bessler

wonder if the fraud has received an answer yet. That was way back in August.

[WaltzCee]

The real reason James posts here.

The only way to shut up you and your friends is to have this forum taken down.
. .. .. .

all pee pee, no motion.

[Clim]

He’s gone, thank you Scott. 👏

JC

And if I am right? What then? I can walk. I am also hated. Would you tell your granddaughter that you're against me?
She'll find out who I am. John, if I am successful, it will be difficult for her not to know and you'll say what? You have a family
to support?
ab hammer said the same thing. Yet if he would've worked with me on an invention, that would not have helped him to support
his family. I know about Amy's situation because I survived it. I could have helped her just as I could have helped ab hammer to
support his family.
What I hear is capitalism.

p.s., before any of you call me a hater, watch this movie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1504320/
If King George of England can overcome a neurological disability, why not Amy?

[Clim]

With Jesus, he said "lame man you can walk". I will not let a Christian tell me I can't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3q8Od5qJio