IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[PeterAX]

To Sam Peppiat.
==============================
Hi Sam,
Hi dear colleague,
Let me report to you what we have done until now.
1) There is a, let's say, relatively serious progress in the first step of development of the gravity wheel. One of the members of our team is an expert in mathematics and he is working hardly now over the problem of expressing mathematically the essence of your excellent basic idea. But it's not an easy job, you know.:) A lot of parameters and unknown variables have to be taken into consideration. A lot of math and a lot of equations! It will take some time. But we will not surrender, of course. Keep working!
2) In the process of working a few questions have appeared already. When these questions are exactly formulated I will send them to you.
3) If you have some other interesting ideas and suggestions (related either to the gravity wheel or to some other interesting and non-standard technologies), then please share them with us. We (our team) will be glad to work together with you and push forward together the technology progress.
------------------------------------------
It's always a great pleasure for me PERSONALLY to correspond with you. I'll write to you in the nearest future.
Regards,

[PeterAX]

Asking our simple question for the 101st time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 101st time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 101st time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
========================
NOTE.
It is worth to note a simple interesting experimental fact, which is as follows.
A) A certain number and a certain shape of the zigzags lead to the validity of the above written item 4.
B) Another combination of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 5.
C) And a third combination (and more precisely, a group of combinations) of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 6.
========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.

[Sam Peppiatt]

Dear Peter AX,

A gravity wheel is a lot like a water wheel. The big trick is to some how, find a way to return the water / weights back up to the top of the wheel. This can only be done by the use of pendulums; as far as I know. This is a major step. Then the pend. have to flip up and lock to the wheel going down, to drive the wheel. A spring is used to flip them up and, a directional bearing temporarily locks them to the wheel, (because they have to rotate with the wheel to be OOB).
The last problem and, by far not the least, is to find a way to control the pendulums. If, and when, that problem can be resolved the wheel will turn.

Thanks for all of your help and, encouragement ---------------------------------------------------------Sam

[PeterAX]

To Sam Peppiat.
=========================
Hi Sam,
Hi dear colleague,
1) Perfectly agree with your last post. (OOB means "out of balance", doesnt'it?)
2) Whike doing the math (as mentioned in my previous post) some other members of our team are discussing how to make a 3D-animation/simulation of your gravity wheel. Keep working!
3) Always ready to help and encourage you:)!
I will write to you in the nearest future.
Regards,

[PeterAX]

Asking our simple question for the 102nd time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 102nd time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 102nd time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
========================
NOTE.
It is worth to note a simple interesting experimental fact, which is as follows.
A) A certain number and a certain shape of the zigzags lead to the validity of the above written item 4.
B) Another combination of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 5.
C) And a third combination (and more precisely, a group of combinations) of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 6.
========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.

[PeterAX]

To Sam Peppiat.
=========================
Hi Sam,
Hi dear colleague,
1) Keep working seriously on the gravity wheel! Both math and 3D-animation/simulation!
2) One question. Some time ago you suggested an interesting idea (among one of the many good ideas of yours) for a possible combination between the gravity wheel and the zigzags. But what was the essence of this concept? Would you be so polite to remind it to us?
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,

[PeterAX]

Asking our simple question for the 103rd time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 103rd time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 103rd time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
========================
NOTE.
It is worth to note a simple interesting experimental fact, which is as follows.
A) A certain number and a certain shape of the zigzags lead to the validity of the above written item 4.
B) Another combination of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 5.
C) And a third combination (and more precisely, a group of combinations) of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 6.
========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.

[Sam Peppiatt]

Hi Peter AX,

I didn't mean for the two to be the same. It just reminded me, of the crooked path that this gravity wheel has led me down--------------------------Sam

[PeterAX]

Hi Sam,
Hi dear colleague,
Thank you for your reply.
1) Yes, I see. Besides the mixing of the two concepts would increase the complexity of the gravity wheel design.
2) Keep working hard! Both math and 3D-animation/simulation. I will write to you in the nearest future in order to report to you what we have done.
Regards,

[PeterAX]

Asking our simple question for the 104th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that (always) V2 > 0 m/s and V3 > 0 m/s.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if (a) V2 is not equal to 0.6 m/s, and if (b) V2 is not equal to 0.8 m/s, and if (c) V3 is not equal to 0.1 m/s, and if (d) V3 is not equal to 0.3 m/s, then both (e) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (f) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY .
--------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 104th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 3-6? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why.)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 104th time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
========================
NOTE.
It is worth to note a simple interesting experimental fact, which is as follows.
A) A certain number and a certain shape of the zigzags lead to the validity of the above written item 4.
B) Another combination of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 5.
C) And a third combination (and more precisely, a group of combinations) of number and shapes of the zigzags leads to the validity of the above written item 6.
========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.