A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by PeterAX »

Let us push forward together the technology progress!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us popularize in any possible way the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y as it contains an absolutely free new technology information, which is able to make better and easier the life of any human being on Earth.
======================================
1) The link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y describes a new electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1.
2) The link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y describes solely and only real experiments.
======================================
Let us popularize in any possible way the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y as it contains an absolutely free new technology information, which is able to make better and easier the life of any human being on Earth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Let us push forward together the technology progress!
User avatar
MrTim
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 922
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:05 pm
Location: "Excellent!" Besslerwheel.com's C. Montgomery Burns
Contact:

re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater t

Post by MrTim »

让我们共同推动技术进步 !
Please post in Chinese from now on, PeterAX. They are already building your device...
"....the mechanism is so simple that even a wheel may be too small to contain it...."
"Sometimes the harder you look the better it hides." - Dilbert's garbageman
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

To MrTim.
==========================
Chinese are building our device? But it's OK! Perfect! That's the purpose -- our freely released new technology information to be evaluated properly and to be put in practice, and to be produced successfully on a large industrial scale!
-------------------------------------
But there is a secret, which is not revealed in our posts. This secret is able to generate efficiency (COP), which is bigger than 10,000 (1,000,000 %). But the revealing of this secret is a matter of another conversation.
-------------------------------------
So you (together with the Chinese:)) accept the validity of our OU water-splitting electrolysis concept, don't you?:)
Last edited by PeterAX on Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

Asking our simple question for the 100th time.
----------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y
---------------------------------------------
2) It is evident that the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that the generated Joule's heat is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that the mass of the released hydrogen is equal to 0.0000000833112 kg.
---------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that the heat, which is generated by burning/exploding of the released hydrogen is equal to 11.83 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if R = 0.5 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 43.67 Joules, that is, COP = 1.37 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
7) It is evident that if R = 0.05 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 3.184 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 15.014 Joules, that is, COP = 4.72 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 100th time.
---------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 2-7? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why?)
---------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 100th time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
=========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

To MrTim.
===============================
Do you accept (together with the Chinese!:)) the validity of our OU water-splitting electrolysis concept? Yes or no?
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

Asking our simple question for the 101st time.
----------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y
---------------------------------------------
2) It is evident that the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that the generated Joule's heat is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that the mass of the released hydrogen is equal to 0.0000000833112 kg.
---------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that the heat, which is generated by burning/exploding of the released hydrogen is equal to 11.83 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if R = 0.5 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 43.67 Joules, that is, COP = 1.37 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
7) It is evident that if R = 0.05 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 3.184 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 15.014 Joules, that is, COP = 4.72 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 101st time.
---------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 2-7? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why?)
---------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 101st time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
=========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

Asking our simple question for the 102nd time.
----------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y
---------------------------------------------
2) It is evident that the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that the generated Joule's heat is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that the mass of the released hydrogen is equal to 0.0000000833112 kg.
---------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that the heat, which is generated by burning/exploding of the released hydrogen is equal to 11.83 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if R = 0.5 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 43.67 Joules, that is, COP = 1.37 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
7) It is evident that if R = 0.05 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 3.184 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 15.014 Joules, that is, COP = 4.72 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 102nd time.
---------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 2-7? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why?)
---------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 102nd time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
=========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

Asking our simple question for the 103rd time.
----------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y
---------------------------------------------
2) It is evident that the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that the generated Joule's heat is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that the mass of the released hydrogen is equal to 0.0000000833112 kg.
---------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that the heat, which is generated by burning/exploding of the released hydrogen is equal to 11.83 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if R = 0.5 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 43.67 Joules, that is, COP = 1.37 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
7) It is evident that if R = 0.05 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 3.184 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 15.014 Joules, that is, COP = 4.72 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 103rd time.
---------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 2-7? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why?)
---------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 103rd time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
=========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
PeterAX
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2021 1:56 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by PeterAX »

Asking our simple question for the 104th time.
----------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAydFMDKj2Y
---------------------------------------------
2) It is evident that the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that the generated Joule's heat is equal to 31.84 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that the mass of the released hydrogen is equal to 0.0000000833112 kg.
---------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that the heat, which is generated by burning/exploding of the released hydrogen is equal to 11.83 Joules.
---------------------------------------------
6) It is evident that if R = 0.5 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 31.84 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 43.67 Joules, that is, COP = 1.37 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
7) It is evident that if R = 0.05 Ohm, then (a) the consumed electric energy is equal to 3.184 Joules and (b) the total amount of the generated heat is equal to 15.014 Joules, that is, COP = 4.72 and COP > 1.
---------------------------------------------
Asking again our simple question for the 104th time.
---------------------------------------------
QUESTION: Do you have any objections against any of the above items 2-7? Yes or no? (And if yes, then specify exactly which item you do not agree with and why?)
---------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your answer for the 104th time. (Only one word -- either "yes" or "no"!)
=========================
We (our team) are open to any suitable form of collaboration of mutual benefit (a) for a further perfection and development of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs and/or (b) for a production of our 11 (eleven) technology breakthroughs on a large industrial scale.
Sam Peppiatt
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1779
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2015 4:12 pm

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by Sam Peppiatt »

My dear friend PeterAX,

Where are you---------------------------------------------------Sam
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5099
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

Re: A simple electric heater, which has efficiency greater than 1

Post by Tarsier79 »

He is on a 3.5 inch floppy drive.
Post Reply