About "m*g*h " interdiction...

[iacob alex]

.....that we know,as the main theoretical "prohibition",to imagine a gravity motor...

Really,a single mass "m" ,moving in a closed loop,between two gravitational levels,has a null energetic result.

If we use a concept including a lever,a fulcrum,two masses,and a small torque difference ,in a free fall process ,the problem changes strikingly : we are interested to iterate,repeat this fall ,so to move "back" (in the up starting position) this small unbalance (torque difference )...in some way,after storage of it.

The most important fact : we have the freedom to increase as much as possible the free fall...see "Same input-greater output..." topic.

In my opinion,we can cause and control a "self-moving" system,due to gravity fall and an in-out-storage energy transit (rotational inertia).

All the best! / Alex

[rasselasss]

Spot on Alex,its the way to go.

[iacob alex]

.....we can exemplify,with the very old Galileo"s stopped pendulum test, at :

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ywgz34ZwjI

For the moment ,it's a real proof that "prohibits" any thinking manner related to a possible/impossible. gravity motor.

If we can discover a different test,that "prohibits" Galileo's stopped pendulum experiment,we have a "key" for free thinking ...in connection with a gravity motor !

All the best! / Alex

[iacob alex]

.....if we test a different mass ( let's say a spring... an "elastic bob" ) and replay the classic Galileo's stopped pendulum experiment , as :
https://scienceprojectideasforkids.com/ ... ulum-2.jpg
So , we can verify , if within one swing the height of the elastic mass ( bob,spring...) on the up-motion is almost the same...
Al_ex

[iacob alex]

……if you take a look at a classic Galileo stopped pendulum experiment :
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mwx0bTi_I-s&feature=share
but add a spring , so to introduce the “nest” experiment : stopped spring mass pendulum test ? !
Al_ex

[agor95]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_eR7FJ_vkM