It's possible that mathematically an OU can exist by separate actions following new actions with new variables. In this case the variation comes from being able to load more weight variance from the third position to the top than the weight variance of loading 3 weights with 4. 4-3=1 and 4-1=3 and 3+1>3. The POINT that you can't seem to see in my math that is not in your math is that there is a difference between trading 3 for 4 and trading a larger amount of weights. Trading 16 weights for 21 has a gain whereas trading 3 for 4 does not. Trading 16 weights for 21 requires dropping 20 weights. That one weight is worth 4 weights at the very top because it only takes one weight to lift four to the top from the third position. Look I didn't think that I would have any difficulty explaining the weight loading model because it is straight up legit. It's the other solutions that we should be looking for based on the weight loading model like my weight swinging design that looks for the solution based on it. I think that my weight swinging model works too.
You also didn't think that the Stork's bill could produce extra force from a horizontal or slanted position. But I showed mathematically that a small amount of force existed left in the calculation even if it was very small would have allowed the velocity to increase enough to extend the spring. Now I don't like the Stork's bill design, it's not very useful but at least it was OU but you stuck by your pseudo math because it fit your ideals about physics. The Stork's bill is like the gear train it can accelerate force but have minimal torque so if there is any resistance it will falter. With minimal air resistance and a horizontal plane you could probably make a ridiculous Stork's bill that accelerates and launches a weight super fast way beyond what you would expect to be needed to capture the force in a spring. I once made gear train when I was a kid that exploded and I input a small push on the driving gear. That explosive force was an example of where this energy is coming from. There mechanical resonance energy in mechanical work that is dispelled through space. They say that everything is a vibration in string theory. I don't know much about it.
You also didn't think that the dolly crowbar would work. And I have nothing to work on for it because no discussion went into it. The fact is it's an attempt at structural anti gravity. A lever holding a weight up at 45 degree angle puts 0.707 force on its axle. It's physically lighter. If you were to separate things that were weighed and on one end you have a guy holding a lever and the other end is the axle with a weight on 45 degree angle I think that the axle would weight 0.707 as long as the levers were the same length and angle (45 degrees). I never got to discuss this with anybody you just assumed that it was not worth discussing, maybe because I said it came from a time travel duplicate memory of an Egyptian engineer. I don't mean to turn people off by time traveler claims. If you weight an axle with a gear train on the axle, you can artificially inflate the length and angle of the lever effecting the axle creating mechanical anti gravity. That is what the dolly crowbar is. You can lift 4 ton rock up a hill on a dolly crowbar as if it weighs 20 pounds. The Engineer was also able to create liquids from liquids using a pump that was shaped like an X. He manipulated a variance in space that could create more new matter from old matter which allowed him to increase water supply on Earth when it was lower and more molten surfaces existed on the planet that were unpleasant. Now I don't know if I can validate my perceptions but if my ideas work then it suggests I might have accuracy.
I think that making a legitimate gravity wheel is extremely rare in possibilities. I think it's easier to invent actual infinite leverage which I don't want to share with anyone publicly or mechanical anti gravity like the dolly crowbar. The weight loading model and its patterns is probably the best chance at making a gravity wheel with overbalancing a wheel. I think that my weight swinging design that mimics the weight loading model might work.
I'm actually in on a few ideas that I don't know if would work or not but I think would be pretty cool if they work the way that I intend them to work. I remember Archimedes my time travel duplicate using a special pulley that had a 1:1 distance exchange but any amount of leverage he put into it. So I have what I think that design is too. In my memory of Archimedes I recall that he kept a secret, when he pulled the ship out of the harbor and onto the beach he didn't use a compound pulley like he shared with people. He used a secret pulley that allowed 1:1 distance exchange that was like a compound pulley. If I'm right I might be holding his secret in memory or I have a false idea which is just as likely.
I feel disposable. I am an injured version of several amazing duplicates if I'm right about being a time traveler. Not all of my duplicates are scientists. Like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin who were just who they were. I think that the biggest trait that I gained from my duplicates is their ability to improvise with music. Since I was a kid I published numerous ghost writing in music and voice acting that helped fund my investment bank that I'm out of contact with, and it reminds me of how Benjamin Franklin played with improvised instruments like cups and his wife once remarked that she thought that she had died and entered heaven one day when she over heard him playing on it. I am less fearful than I should be. I don't care if I die. I am disposable. I am an injured copy of several healthy copies. I know of 4 other duplicates of me in the present time. It's possible that my time travel duplicates in that are traveling through outer space will return to Earth eventually. I just get by day to day. They will be amazing.
