Global Energy Prize

[Sam Peppiatt]

Waltcy, Sure, after you put a million dollars into. I meant more for the idea of it, which is where you really need the money----------------Sam

[gravitationallychallenged]

These prize's are not for novel ideas. They go for proven technologies only. It's an art to get one. You have to kiss there ass long and hard-Sam

The wealthy oligarchs who run that organization can kiss my ass. Most people in those positions of wealth and power have no regard for the common people. Instead of encouraging free energy technologies they would rather enslave the masses and tax them to death. Why wouldn't they steal your technology to use for themselves? Research what happened to Stanley Meyer, Victor Schaumberger or T Henry Moray when they were approached by wealthy investors. I would rather remain unknown, share a successful concept with other BWF members and sell inexpensive prototypes that other commoners could copy. Once the concept went viral it would be impossible to suppress.

[Sam Peppiatt]

I would like to take there Rubles and give them to Ukraine. But, how would I ever convince them? I can't even convince any of you----------Sam

[agor95]

I would rather remain unknown, share a successful concept with other BWF members and sell inexpensive prototypes that other commoners could copy. Once the concept went viral it would be impossible to suppress.

That is the way to go.

[bruno]

condivido pienamente il pensiero; grazie da Bruno

[WaltzCee]

This is a more appropriate place for this discussion.

I have several ideas of what to do with a PM wheel, if my present ideas make one.

The first idea is to create (בָּרָא, 'bara' ) a viral buzz around the discovery with the aim of disclosing my thoughts in a book. Then sell the book.

The second is to approach some deep pockets and sell the ideas signing a nondisclosure/agreement not to compete. I'll need a lot of capital for me to hold up my end of that agreement. Security, compound, etc.

The third idea is the most work, but I like it best. Monitize a channel, create the buzz, then when I raise enough capital to fund the prizes of a competition, put one together and let it rip. By that I mean email all my subscribers a PDF of the ideas and the model.

I think that third idea would be a blast.

or finally, take it to the grave.


What idea do you like. Or alternative ideas.

also, everyone is welcome to voice their thoughts.


Which idea do you like?

I would have thought that Walter Clarkson
"Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul."
was a more noble Texan than to suggest such fraudulent endeavours.

I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked! Shocked!

Another idea to do with PM is to seek funding and market it.

Wherein is the fraud, Frank?

Not that your ideas have any merit, yet what would you do if you accidently stumbled onto an answer.

:)

[Dr.Wlazlak]

Hello People: Global Energy Prize: How hard is it to make Gravity into a recirculating form of usable energy?
I have been Working on forms of Gravity and magnetic recirculating energy devices for over 54 years
What I have found is There are two things involved in wining a Global Energy Prize
#1 is having a something device that make something from something to get something out of the something more than or less than
the something it started with. Any Questions?
#2 Does anyone have a workable something device that can produce more something energy or less something energy from the source energy
That can be used to power something more than itself? and it self also

If there is someone that had such a device Would anyone be able to find them? to tell them, Why don't you inter your tech
to the Global Energy Prize?

Oh One catch: If the Technology is worth Billions of USD What is the exchange rate percent for showing the tech. to get the prize.
I guess there were #3 also
Something wining is losing or losing is wining : or some form of point of View as viewed to what something is worth the the maker of such things

Thanks Dr. Wlazlak

[WaltzCee]

Oh One catch: If the Technology is worth Billions of USD What is the exchange rate percent for showing the tech. to get the prize.


Thanks Dr. Wlazlak

Hello Dr Wlazlak,

I just Google and found world consumption of oil to be:

• 35,442,913,090 barrels per year

If, and it a 'uge if, electricity could be produced from gravity, that process would take quite the bite out of that market.

Some might be willing to sell the idea short, then go hunting for fish. :)

Welcome to the forum.

Walt

[Dr.Wlazlak]

Thank you Walt
Gravity is Hydroelectric power of sort, but gravity by itself more than likely is not a very good replacement to Oil, fossil fuels.
Unless you have a device you would like to offer as to win the Global Energy Prize. And I would pay money to see that. Gravity wise. I mean

I have Technology that Could maybe Replace Oil, Fossil Fuels, But the Sad part is no one believes me. So it can never replace that as an option.

And If I were to put it up as development project to win the Global Energy Prize. Because it could replace Oil, fossil fuels
The people putting on the Global energy prize Thing, would not allow such a technology to be presented in conflict with the Oil thing.
Or Solar, Thing, Or Wind Thing, Each of these things are backed be the Golden Rulers, That seem not to want something that may conflict
with giving a Global Energy Prize to Gravity powered only systems.

So where does that leave Bessler? Just where he was in his time.

So mad he just burns it up. and falls off the mill and is no more. Thus 300 years or so later nothing is changed. Who want to know how it works?

And Why? if you have working system no one will believe you, And So on and So on. I know 54 years and counting.

Hay if you don't believe it try it, Call Thousands of people working on this type of technology and tell them you have Working technology
and See What they Say, 99.99 percent will not return your Emails and the one that does will not believe your system works.
because there they have the only working system in the world. This is a True Story. Really Try It, It is crazy how many people working on
this technology will not talk to somebody else working on the same thing and say they have the only working one on the planet.

Global Energy Prize: They are no one of Us. Gravity People.

Thanks Dr. Wlazlak PS. The Barrels are getting less every year. Something to look forward to.

[WaltzCee]

• I have some comments
  
  • #1 is having a something device that make something from something to get something out of the something more than or less than
    the something it started with. Any Questions?
  • #2 Does anyone have a workable something device that can produce more something energy or less something energy from the source energy
    That can be used to power something more than itself? and it self also

Although many have claimed to have the ideas to design a GPGD (Gravity Powered Gravity Driven) wheel, it's highly unlikely they do. There are also some to have claimed to have made one. I'm skeptical.

All I have are ideas. I don't know if they'll work or not. I felt it prudent though to do the what if before testing the ideas because I have no idea how rational I'd be if I were successful.

I've coined the expression PMS to describe what happens to one when they think they have the answer. Perpetual Motion Syndrome.

People go crazy. Bat Guano crazy.


ETA
I understand the delema. Also, I think Bessler was pushed.

[Dr.Wlazlak]

Walt: Many do not have to be pushed to be pushed and have the same curplunk end of story effect.

What I have found is it takes 2 energies to make one output device. the formula is very simple Action =1 counter reaction =1 friction = ?

Gravity all by itself is 1 down energy: Hydroelectric uses 2 energies to make 1 power output of electrical or other power
The first energy is from the Sun that make water go UP higher than it needs to go down to use the second form of energy from gravity.

All gravity only devices have the same issue They will not win the Global Energy Prize.

Curplunk.

But now to the Second Question: Do you think if someone had a Technology that could not be debunked Should they offer a $ 25,000 prize to
win if someone could debunk the Technology?

I like this Question: it is just backward from the other prize thing.

Dr. Wlazlak

[WaltzCee]

But now to the Second Question: Do you think if someone had a Technology that could not be debunked Should they offer a $ 25,000 prize to
win if someone could debunk the Technology?

I like this Question: it is just backward from the other prize thing.

Strange you should ask that. I was thinking of marketing a book to college boys with the design of the machine and offer a million USD to the best explaination as to where the energy's coming from causing the rotation.

That's how I'd promote preselling the book.

What I have found is it takes 2 energies to make one output device. the formula is very simple Action =1 counter reaction =1 friction = ?

My thesis is like begats like. You don't get plums from thistles.

Inherent in the fabric of 4d time/space are the very germs of creation. The material world is a manifestation of light. The Father of Lights is the prime mover. Nothing was made that was not made by him.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

[gravitationallychallenged]

Inherent in the fabric of 4d time/space are the very germs of creation. The material world is a manifestation of light. The Father of Lights is the prime mover. Nothing was made that was not made by him.

I agree, Walt. The Bible tells us that that Father of Lights, through His Son Jesus, designed all of creation and through Him all things exist. If any of us discover a solution it will need to have the Father's approval or it will come to nothing. I'm not judging Bessler but perhaps his conduct didn't meet His approval and, as an ironic epitaph, Bessler died from injuries suffered from the very force he had claimed to master. Another possibility could be that the world wasn't judged worthy to obtain what Bessler had discovered.

By posting this thread are you intimating that you have achieved success and are seeking a consensus as to which course of action to take? Be wary of deep pockets. Sometimes those pockets become deep as a result of unbridled greed.

[WaltzCee]

. .. .. .
By posting this thread are you intimating that you have achieved success and are seeking a consensus as to which course of action to take? Be wary of deep pockets. Sometimes those pockets become deep as a result of unbridled greed.

No sir!! I've tried to be very clear about that.

All I have are ideas. I don't know if they'll work or not. I felt it prudent though to do the what if before testing the ideas because I have no idea how rational I'd be if I were successful.

They aren't very original ideas at that. I've done some testing, put a sharp pencil to them, and at times had thousands of engineers examine them.

That's all I got right now

. .. .. .
If you don't like what the sim is predicting then do a real-world build for comparison purposes and take it up with the 10,000 engineers, physicists, and programmers who built the kinematic sim software and beta tested it before release to the commercial market.

Or, just start practicing on Algodoo.

[WaltzCee]

By posting this thread are you intimating that you have achieved success

Some one else might be successful. I don't think people have given the matter enough thought. Two characters I could name clearly have stepped on it if you ask me. I'm looking at ideas in part to give others some directions to consider.

I'm not judging Bessler but perhaps his conduct didn't meet His approval and, as an ironic epitaph, Bessler died from injuries suffered from the very force he had claimed to master. Another possibility could be that the world wasn't judged worthy to obtain what Bessler had

I think neither. If Bessler had been successful, the world would be a much different place. I think God has a timeline and Bessler was ahead of his time.