Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
Moderator: scott
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
delete
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
delete
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
This is strange Frank. Every time I click on this link you posted
It takes me to a log in screen. Then when I login, it takes me to a screen with a post in progress.
Weird.
Welcome back.
........................¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
Yes indeed.
They do have the same instantaneous kinetic energy in the end
But they do not have the same cumulative kinetic energy.
The low road mass, L has received more energy from the
cycloid slope reaction than the high road mass H has
received from the straight line slope reaction.
Showing this with maths is beyond my pay grade but I see it can be
demonstrated graphically by dividing the slopes into small cells and
adding up the contribution each cell makes.
It will be found that the total reaction energy input
is greater for L than for H.
Now if we return L up the H straight line slope
to the starting point, we have generated an energy surplus.
We have a closed circuit for L with a surplus of energy.
We have induced energy from the gravitational field.
Last edited by Senax on Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
Correction:Senax wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 5:10 pmYes indeed.
They do have the same instantaneous kinetic energy in the end
But they do not have the same cumulative kinetic energy.
The low road mass, L has received more energy from the
cycloid slope reaction than the high road mass H has
received from the straight line slope reaction.
Showing this with maths is beyond my pay grade but I see it can be
demonstrated graphically by dividing the slopes into small cells and
adding up the contribution each cell makes.
It will be found that the total reaction energy input
is greater for L than for H.
Now if we return L up the H straight line slope
to the starting point, we have generated an energy surplus.
We have a closed circuit for L with a surplus of energy.
We have induced energy from the gravitational field.
We have induced energy from the slope reaction with the gravitational field acting as a catalyst.
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.
Re: Scrap pad for testing .jpegs, .gifs etc.
I'm just posting this image to check that I have remembered how to do it. 8-)
As you can see it show two pendulums, one following the other and released for a small angle.
I suppose on might call it a sub 360° degree pendulum.
I shall be discussing its relevance in subsequent posts.
AVE MARIA, gratia plena, Dominus tecum.
Ô Marie, conçue sans péché, priez pour nous qui avons recours à vous.