Terragravitic Induction

[Senax]

Can you italicize periods?

LOL . I enjoy your witticisms. Keep 'em coming. ;o)

[Senax]

I see that Tom Wlazlak has posted before on the Bessler Forum.
Maybe he got his idea to work in the interim.

I've spoken with Tom Wlazlak, he admits that he's never built a working demonstration (and doesn't really plan to) but feels sure his idea will work OK. That sounds so familiar, doesn't it.

Isn't it strange how the article appears to describe something working whereas the inventor himself says otherwise. Another unfortunate example of poor and/or misleading reporting.

[Leafy]

It sounds like Einstein. He never got his finger doing experiment. Truthfully, I prefer Einstein than Tesla. Tesla tried too hard.

Electric OU is just an imperfection of stator rotor position. Theine Heine, if I spell his name right, got acceleration from shorting coil. Just an example.

[agor95]

It sounds like Einstein. He never got his finger doing experiment. Truthfully, I prefer Einstein than Tesla. Tesla tried too hard.

Electric OU is just an imperfection of stator rotor position. Theine Heine, if I spell his name right, got acceleration from shorting coil. Just an example.

There is irony for Einstein preferred Tesla. 'The most intelligent man'.

[Leafy]

Thane Heins effect

Suppose we have perfect stator. Lenz law will oppose the rotor pointing at the center of rotation.

But in the real world, there is no such thing as prefect alignment so the stator position misaligned and Lenz law pointing somewhere off the center of rotation.

I suppose if the rotor turn the other direction, the effect is gone.

[Senax]

Quite apart from anything else, common sense suggests that if the car taking the low road gets to Scotland before the car taking the high road the first car must have got extra energy from somewhere. :o)

But not if its gravity , with gravity it depends on the height started and ended and not the path.

That is the whole point, isn't it.
It did not get its extra energy from gravity.
It got its extra energy from the slope reaction.
That is why when both cars end up on the horizontal road travelling at the same speed as each other, the car which went down the curved slope is miles ahead and stays miles ahead.

And the straight slope guy is looking all bewildered and saying,
"How the heck did that happen?" :o)

Forum enthusiasts will remember that a 360° pendulum increases
its angular speed as it drops from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock.
In other words its acceleration towards its centre of curvature increases.
Its second derivative energy, its acceleration energy, increases.
Change in second derivative energy is third derivative energy, precession energy.

Now the fall of the mass down the curved slope is
the inverse of the fall of the pendulum bob.
In the case of the pendulum, the bob is being pulled towards its centre of curvature.
In the case of the slope, the mass is being pushed towards its centre of curvature.
In both cases third derivative energy, precession energy, is being generated.

What about the mass on the straight slope?
Is that generating any precession energy?
Is its acceleration towards its centre of curvature increasing?
Clearly not because it doesn't have a centre of curvature does it.
It doesn't have one because its not curved, its straight.
So a straight slope is incapable of generating precession energy.

The straight slope can only generate acceleration energy,
whereas the curved slope can generate acceleration energy and precession energy.
And that is why the mass on the curved slope arrives before the mass on the straight slope.

And that, straight slope guy, is how the heck it happened. :o)

[Leafy]

Sharp x2

[johannesbender]

When a thing is freely rolling down a curve or a inclined plane or falling straight down , under the influence of gravity , the mass accelerates because of gravity , when it does not accelerate it would either be at a constant speed , still in one place or decelerate , for instance observe the bottom of the slinky : https://youtu.be/59dANJTLbyo and https://youtu.be/uiyMuHuCFo4

[Sam Peppiatt]

senax,
Isn't the acceleration just more at the beginning of the curve, then on the straight one or, an I being a dunce. Don't answer that-------Sam
PS What if you made two straights? The first one steeper that the 2nd one.

[Senax]

Sharp x2

You're Sharp³ Leafy. Congratulations.

You were the first
that ever burst.
Into that silent sea
(The Rime of the Ancient Mariner)

[Leafy]

Thank you Senax,

It’s just within our worlds. I’m not certain about the outside boundaries. But happy moments are happy moments, who cares if we’re living in someone imagination. Lol

[agor95]

Thank you Senax,

It’s just within our worlds. I’m not certain about the outside boundaries. But happy moments are happy moments, who cares if we’re living in someone imagination. Lol

What happens when you are a figment of your own imagination?

Could this be the true reality of existence?

:)

[Leafy]

What happens when you are a figment of your own imagination?

Could this be the true reality of existence?

:)

Figment of imagination is still a firing electrical signal of one’s brain cell. It is as real as any other cell firing.

If you argue that 1+1=2 and I argue that 1+1=3. Maybe you should considered that I’m aware that 1+1=2?

[Senax]

But not if its gravity , with gravity it depends on the height started and ended and not the path.

That is the whole point, isn't it.
It did not get its extra energy from gravity.
It got its extra energy from the slope reaction.
That is why when both cars end up on the horizontal road travelling at the same speed as each other, the car which went down the curved slope is miles ahead and stays miles ahead.

And the straight slope guy is looking all bewildered and saying,
"How the heck did that happen?" :o)

Forum enthusiasts will remember that a 360° pendulum increases
its angular speed as it drops from 12 o'clock to 6 o'clock.
In other words its acceleration towards its centre of curvature increases.
Its second derivative energy, its acceleration energy, increases.
Change in second derivative energy is third derivative energy, precession energy.

Now the fall of the mass down the curved slope is
the inverse of the fall of the pendulum bob.
In the case of the pendulum, the bob is being pulled towards its centre of curvature.
In the case of the slope, the mass is being pushed towards its centre of curvature.
In both cases third derivative energy, precession energy, is being generated.

What about the mass on the straight slope?
Is that generating any precession energy?
Is its acceleration towards its centre of curvature increasing?
Clearly not because it doesn't have a centre of curvature does it.
It doesn't have one because its not curved, its straight.
So a straight slope is incapable of generating precession energy.

The straight slope can only generate acceleration energy,
whereas the curved slope can generate acceleration energy and precession energy.
And that is why the mass on the curved slope arrives before the mass on the straight slope.

And that, straight slope guy, is how the heck it happened. :o)

The difference between successive increments of mv² for the straight slope is zero
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCx5Ph7EAxg

The difference between successive increments of mv³ for the curved slope is not zero.
It is the the 3rd derivative energy.
It is the Precession energy.

[Leafy]

We can interpret the curve as two straight slopes joining together.

A ball sliding down the slope have a normal force.

When the ball hit the joint to change slope, it imparts a collision force.