Jubat, I'm only doing this because this is Bessler's legacy and a repeat of 300 years ago will make people who pursue perpetual motion a
running joke as a bunch of losers. What they are striking is the hub. But to use it differently they need to be spread further apart. And now they are the top overbalanced weight
he upper weight is not attached to an external mechanism, nor does it rely on external moving bodies by means of whose weight revolutions continue as long as the cords or chains on which they hang permit. As long as it remains outside the center of gravity, this upper weight incessantly exercises universal motion from which the essential constituent parts of the machine receive power and push.
https://besslerwheel.com/writings/das_triumphans.html
and the under balanced weight
These parts are enclosed in a case and are coordinated with one another so that they not only never again reach an equilibrium (or point of rest) for themselves but incessantly seek with their admirably fast swing to move and drive on the axis of their vortices loads that are vertically applied from the outside and are proportional to the size of the housing. same link as above
And when Bessler wrote Das Triumphirende Perpetuum Mobile Orffyreanum, in English it's The Triumphant Perpetual Mobile Orffyreus
I think when you find out the amount of small details I have to make, you'll understand building like this is a lot of work. I also think I can teach you enough algebra and calculus to discuss torque and f = m * d/t. It's like I've been trying to tell you about this, the clues align like stars in the night sky. And if people visit this forum someone will need to be able to discuss Bessler's Wheel.
With the math and science, it will be what applies to perpetual motion. And with the spreadsheets that I have, I should be able to clean one up so factoring
f(x) = ∫ ∆a sin x/∆ a cos x would be cut and paste for the most part. It'd be what values you want to use and I use Linux but spreadsheets should all have the
Σ (sigma function) which allows you to add, average, etc. a column.
When Bessler says vortices, he's talking about a whirlpool or whirlwind. And with some of the language they use in science I'd be able to get you familiar with what they like using and when. An example is when a bound system is mentioned, that refers to thermodynamics. An unbalanced force has to do with Newton's laws of motion. When certain words are used you'll understand the context that they're being used in. And I apply the same concept to my builds to keep the function of the parts separated.
I took screenshots of 2 different spreadsheets that I use. One shows about how I discovered the mathematical relationship in atmospheric pressures (before using f(x) = dy/dx) and the other one has the sine/cosine values for 0º to 90º. And what this all means is that you could be the "Candy Man". If someone has a sweet tooth for a spreadsheet you'll have their candy.
It wouldn't be surprising if more people took an interest in spreadsheets because once the spreadsheet is finished it simplifies a lot of calculations. And with different designs, torque and work will be easy to calculate.
This is a link to spreadsheet I uploaded to dropbox. You'll be able to download it and you should be able to open it. Then you'll kind of understand some of what goes into my work.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yruagexm ... nqjst&dl=0
p.s., I know Linux uses radians and not anything related to "SOHCAHTOA" (sine = opposite/hypotenuse, cosine = adjacent/hypotenuse. tangent = opposite/adjacent) which is what allows for the value as determined by a right triangle. That's other math I can explain to you later if you want to learn it. I do not know if Excel, etc. uses what SOHCAHTOA allows for.
Jubat, this is some of the work that goes into what I do. My physics experiment? That is also a very serious project like Bessler's Wheel. I can simplify
analyzing perpetual motion machine designs but not that other science.