The problem you are going to solve would be how exactly would a lateral moving weight apply a counter force if its not actively pulling or pushing on or against the rotary lever , because gravity wont be giving it any lateral force though , this is why springs work and possibly hanging weight designs too springs can provide its force in any direction for example.Daniel.R wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:44 amjohannesbender wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:40 pm
Tarsier the issue with all these types of designs i tested and looked at is the resets , but it is true that it takes very little energy to move because the forces are near equilibrium , of course friction and air resistance wont disappear , and i believe the adjustment is counter balanced , i saw a few patents with adjustment counter balancing systems although i believe the rotary one in the video is being locked when he adjusts , but i get what you see in it (why reset if you can adjust).
This is the effect I believe we're after, but without springs. Those counterbalanced manipulator arms surely makes the total weight of the system easy to manipulate... duh.johannesbender wrote: ↑Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:41 pm
Daniel a way to do it is to match the torque of the pivoting weight (or the "arching weight" as you call it) to the force of the lateral translating weight by its distance on a lever but if you are really keen on keeping it horizontal then a spring instead , the designs i did was a hanging mass matched to a cam so that the force of the hanging weight (your lateral weight example) was levered with the cam shape which then connected to a yoked arm ("the arching weight") , and another i did was a spring that was forced matched on the opposite end of a weighted lever.
Using springs however is how the reset problem introduces itself. Matching the torques with a strictly horizontal moving weight should be able to counterbalance a vertically arching weight, just like the cam and spring system does. Having the counterweight move in strict X-axis removes the reset problem due to no GPE being gained or lost while counterbalancing.
How did your design with the hanging mass and cam system operate JB? Did the hanging mass translate up and down while counterbalancing the arching weight? Do you believe this would be possible with a horizontally translating weight and an arching weight instead?
I guess if you were to create a mechanism that pairs different weights against the current torque of the arm (angle force and distance) to a cam , such that the weights provide enough sliding friction or inertia via the cam to the arm to match the torque it could possibly be done , or you pair some sort of resistance mechanism to the torque .
I never did build the hanging weight version ,ran in to issues and looking in to it a little more.