Nash Gravitational Theory - The excact solutuon, where Besslers wheel can exist?

[Oystein]

Exact Solutions of the Field Equations for Empty Space in the Nash Gravitational Theory. A peer reviewed article.
https://uis.brage.unit.no/uis-xmlui/han ... 50/2485376

A Norwegian professor and a student tested Nash field gravitational theory in classicsl physsics, and it completely worked. They programmed a new computer program from scratch and spent around 3 years to solve all Nash equations and simulated a complete universe with mass, energy and radiation. (They didn't test the solution in quantum mechanics, only in classical physics). Nash said the theory is.not yet complete, but nobody cared to look at it because of Nash mental issues, and that it is too different from current accepted model.

The theory works not only for mass but also works for radiation/light/electromagetism.

Nash vacuume/empty space is not really empty but has several properties, like red-shift, cosmological constant/curvature etc. It does not need dark energy, don't have expantion, thus doesn't have a Big Bang. The universe has some "self generating" properties, Vacuum energy, that made Nash comment that his model does remove the need for creation/god, remove the need to apply mysterious dark energy to cause an expantion, thus doesn't have a big bang.

I believe this is a model that maybe would "allow" a Bessler's wheel to exist.

Keep working!

Best
Øystein

[Oshino Yoshida]

Hello Oystein, i hope you are well.

We need to ask ourselves Why NGT Hasn’t Gained Mainstream Acceptance

1, Challenging mainstream science

2, Lack of a Complete Mathematical Formulation

3, Conflict with Observed Gravitational Waves

4, The "Ether" Concept: The idea of an underlying ether is viewed sceptically by many physicists due to its historical association with previous disproven theories.

5, Occam's Razor:(the simplest explanation is usually the best.) GR is a simpler theory with fewer assumptions and has been extensively tested and confirmed by numerous experiments. NGT introduces additional concepts (the scalar field, the ether) without providing significantly more explanatory power in most cases.

6, Limited Research Community: Compared to General Relativity, there are relatively few researchers actively working on developing and testing Nash Gravitational Theory.

In conclusion, challenging mainstream science is difficult because of a combination of rigorous scientific standards, institutional pressures, social dynamics, and communication challenges. However, it's not impossible, and legitimate challenges are essential for scientific progress. The key is to approach the process with intellectual honesty, methodological rigor, and a willingness to engage in open debate.

I hope the solution to Besslers secret will some day surface. However, it's been so long and the water so muddy regarding the many iterations of said wheel, even if NGT was to become mainstream the secret of the wheel will remain lost to us all.

[johannesbender]

The issue here is that whether a theory or such is accepted or not , does not and should not be a reason why a "gravity wheel" should or should not exist , and neither should it be an excuse , however imo i cant foresee any model or law or such that would be accepted or welcomed where within free energy creation would be a possibility since it is accepted as a fundamental impossibility , Albert Einstein comes to mind .

[Oystein]

Yes, and that was the point. Albert Einstein indirectly assumed that Besslers wheel didn't work when he made GR and SR.

So Both Winstein ( GR, SR) and Bessler's wheel can't be true at the same time. Thus it causes research into Bessler's wheel ro become half hearted or even aborted, or never started.

More and more measurements show results that violates classic theory, regarding distant galaxies, dark energy, and expansion etc. and I find that encouraging.

The point is.. as long as we apply physics that say Bessler's wheel can't exist, said physics is either, wrong, incomplete or Bessler's wheel was fake. If we believe it was fake, we don't take the researxh seriously, and we will never discover it.

I guess it would't take too long to reinvent Bessler's wheel, if we had an accepted theory that said that space vacuum was self-generative (on subatomic/quantum level) in nature. Explaining "god"/creation at the same time, thus made Bessler's wheel at least philosophicallly possible.

[johannesbender]

The point is.. as long as we apply physics that say Bessler's wheel can't exist, said physics is either, wrong, incomplete or Bessler's wheel was fake. If we believe it was fake, we don't take the researxh seriously, and we will never discover it.

I mostly agree with that .