Georg's "ideas". Interesting.
Wasn't this a link on the home page of Besslerwheel.com?
How did he merit that distinction?
Part of the PM clique-ster clique?
If what I have works now, it could be described in just a few sentences and no drawings.
Beware of complex plans, etc. The complexity could be counted on as a barrier to anyone attempting to build, and thus exposing the sham.
I've kept what I've done on this board to only those tricks employed by Bessler himself.
Go ahead. Try to expose me.
robert
It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than trying to solely profit
Moderator: scott
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Robert (The Carpenter's Boy)
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
-
coylo
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
But you already have exposed yourself!
You've revealed your stinking attitude and what a cringeworthy ego you have.
Well done!
You've revealed your stinking attitude and what a cringeworthy ego you have.
Well done!
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Cringeworthy? Now that's a word I've never encountered before! It's not even in my dictionary, but I understand the general connotation.
Re: re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, t
Coylo:coylo wrote:But you already have exposed yourself!
You've revealed your stinking attitude and what a cringeworthy ego you have.
Well done!
Your Avatar....is that a bathroom commode you're squatting on?
But of course you and the rest of them will be on your knees thanking me for figuring out this riddle of PMM and eventually using a pump connected to your commode powered by my PMM principle.
Robert (The Carpenter's Boy)
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
-
coylo
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
There you go exposing yourself again!Coylo:
Your Avatar....is that a bathroom commode you're squatting on?
But of course you and the rest of them will be on your knees thanking me for figuring out this riddle of PMM and eventually using a pump connected to your commode powered by my PMM principle.
Not only have backed-up further what I mentioned before, but you have also revealed your flat sense of humour.
Oh Wobert! If only responding to your desperate little replies could be more challenging. I'd rather argue over religion with Gene!
By the way.....
I can't understand the necessity of the "rest of us" being on our knees to thank you personally, but hey, maybe your one of those homosexuals!(exposing yourself yet again) You can live your life the way you want but don't be goin' and touchin' my arse or anything!
That's something I won't tolerate!
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
LMAO. I've been checking back over Roberts posts... I just can't find any information in them that might be useful to anyone - nothing! Maybe I'm just missing it - somebody please point out where Robert has offered useful information or help to anyone on the forum.
This ungrateful accuses anyone with a forum rep higher than his own that they are holding back vital information and that they belong to some mysterious "PM clique-ster clique" group. Yet he offers nothing himself.
Perhaps this is what Robert calls useful sharing of information...
This ungrateful accuses anyone with a forum rep higher than his own that they are holding back vital information and that they belong to some mysterious "PM clique-ster clique" group. Yet he offers nothing himself.
Perhaps this is what Robert calls useful sharing of information...
What a joke, Robert. You've been accusing people of holding back vital information now for months and it's become tired and boring. Now your accusing people of belonging to some imagined 'PM clique' on the forum, who are also holding back information from you - and yet you yourself offer nothing of value at all. If you're going to act like a wingeing loser with nothing to offer other than pink-elephant fantasies of some vague future success then I suggest you might be more comfortable bragging in a pre-school sandbox to other kiddies your own mental age.Robert wrote:Ordered a part from Boston Gear today.
cost: $156.23
robert
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Robert,
I have been a patient man and put up with your gibe. I thought that you were a man of substance when you first joined this forum. Now you have blown all respect I ever had in you.
Your quote:
<Go ahead. Try to expose me.>
You have done a very good job of that yourself. I feel there is little left to expose. You threaten to leave and then attempt to come back with an alias. Your then go back to your old thread and pick up where you left off.
Try to expose you? for what reason, I could care less!
Ralph
I have been a patient man and put up with your gibe. I thought that you were a man of substance when you first joined this forum. Now you have blown all respect I ever had in you.
Your quote:
<Go ahead. Try to expose me.>
You have done a very good job of that yourself. I feel there is little left to expose. You threaten to leave and then attempt to come back with an alias. Your then go back to your old thread and pick up where you left off.
Try to expose you? for what reason, I could care less!
Ralph
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
I see the "useful" information ovyyus has provided to the board has resulted in a working wheel?
Come on, I've given a few places to buy parts, etc.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Come on, I've given a few places to buy parts, etc.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Robert (The Carpenter's Boy)
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Useful information that I and other members here contribute to this joint research will, I think, one day result in a working wheel for us all. My hope is that a solution won't come from some ungrateful bloodsucker who contributed nothing of value to the research community as he took what he wanted while constantly whining about how he didn't have enough and he wanted more and generally behaving like a total prick that no one would want to know.Robert wrote:I see the "useful" information ovyyus has provided to the board has resulted in a working wheel?
-
ken_behrendt
- Addict
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:45 am
- Location: new jersey, usa
- Contact:
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
I just want to state for the record that I would highly doubt that there are at the present time any secret subgroups within this Discussion Board's membership that actually have the secret of Bessler's wheels and are purposely going out of their way to suppress that knowledge from the rest of the members or the world at large.
I've been here almost a year now and note that there are only "cliques" in the sense that certain members with a common research philosophy or PM device type interest will tend to exchange communications with each other more frequently than with someone they perceive as not having those interests. But, I do not personally know of any conspiracy here and if I ever discovered that such a thing existed, I would refuse to be part of it.
Overall, there are members here with different levels of "activity" when it comes to OU/PM research. Some are actively engaged at the moment in the quest, either with virtual or real builds. Others were more active in the past and are now in a meditative "standby" status and awaiting inspiration from the posts of others with the hope that it will energize their own creativity and, perhaps, make them an active researcher again. And, still others, may be permanently "retired" from the pursuit, but still interested enough in the subject to see what progress, if any, is being made by others.
And, of course, there are different levels of security practiced by different members. Some, such as myself, favor openly divulging a design with the hope that it will, even if it fails, be of some value to others. Others, hoping to capitalize off of a possible successful design in the future, may only hint about what they are working or not mention it at all.
ken
I've been here almost a year now and note that there are only "cliques" in the sense that certain members with a common research philosophy or PM device type interest will tend to exchange communications with each other more frequently than with someone they perceive as not having those interests. But, I do not personally know of any conspiracy here and if I ever discovered that such a thing existed, I would refuse to be part of it.
Overall, there are members here with different levels of "activity" when it comes to OU/PM research. Some are actively engaged at the moment in the quest, either with virtual or real builds. Others were more active in the past and are now in a meditative "standby" status and awaiting inspiration from the posts of others with the hope that it will energize their own creativity and, perhaps, make them an active researcher again. And, still others, may be permanently "retired" from the pursuit, but still interested enough in the subject to see what progress, if any, is being made by others.
And, of course, there are different levels of security practiced by different members. Some, such as myself, favor openly divulging a design with the hope that it will, even if it fails, be of some value to others. Others, hoping to capitalize off of a possible successful design in the future, may only hint about what they are working or not mention it at all.
ken
Last edited by ken_behrendt on Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
On 7/6/06, I found, in any overbalanced gravity wheel with rotation rate, ω, axle to CG distance d, and CG dip angle φ, the average vertical velocity of its drive weights is downward and given by:
Vaver = -2(√2)πdωcosφ
Vaver = -2(√2)πdωcosφ
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
ovyyus,
I have a question.
Since u have run on at length about a "sense of community", and believe your posting is of great value here, I was wondering...
Have you finished your book yet?
It is slightly hypocritical for you to bitch about my slim details, when you have a book full.
I have a question.
Since u have run on at length about a "sense of community", and believe your posting is of great value here, I was wondering...
Have you finished your book yet?
It is slightly hypocritical for you to bitch about my slim details, when you have a book full.
Robert (The Carpenter's Boy)
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Robert, I can hardly bare to answer you. The book in question is still in progress with completion expected soon. The original intention, which proved very successful, was to provided the critical content of the document freely on my website - even for whining parasites who never offer anything in return and are only in this research for their own personal gain and glory, everyone else be damned.
Your concept of hypocrisy seems a bit warped like everything else.
Your concept of hypocrisy seems a bit warped like everything else.
Last edited by ovyyus on Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Robert , I too find your behaviour rather peculiar . I think you might be headed for a nervous breakdown.
Why don't you take a break and go fishing or something. The Bessler problem can wait . It's been waiting for nearly 300 years so a little while longer won't make all that much difference.
Graham
Why don't you take a break and go fishing or something. The Bessler problem can wait . It's been waiting for nearly 300 years so a little while longer won't make all that much difference.
Graham
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
ovyyus,
Then may I suggest that you quicken the pace before it's too late to recoup the costs of publication?
Actually, everything on this board has been pretty worthless in my pursuit of PM, but a lot of entertainment. WM2D is nice, but has proven to be error prone. Possibly, everything I've posted is just as worthless. I know now anyway that MT will not be needed by me, but perhaps by others to alleviate the eating of my dust!
I've found something on my own, totally different from yall's "clues", hence my change in personality and my attitude.
Quote: "Robert, I can hardly bare to answer you."
Please don't "bare" anything! But, you must "bear" with me.
Then may I suggest that you quicken the pace before it's too late to recoup the costs of publication?
Actually, everything on this board has been pretty worthless in my pursuit of PM, but a lot of entertainment. WM2D is nice, but has proven to be error prone. Possibly, everything I've posted is just as worthless. I know now anyway that MT will not be needed by me, but perhaps by others to alleviate the eating of my dust!
I've found something on my own, totally different from yall's "clues", hence my change in personality and my attitude.
Quote: "Robert, I can hardly bare to answer you."
Please don't "bare" anything! But, you must "bear" with me.
Robert (The Carpenter's Boy)
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
There's never time to do it right the first time, but there's always time to do it over again.
re: It Would Be More Noble To Clear J. Bessler's Name, than
Wrong again Robert. I see no need to bear with you at all. Good luck with that new personality and attitude - top class stuff.