hi wheeler..
I'm not all that familiar with electronics, but it won't stop me from having a little fun while I'm at it. I feel no matter who builds this unit, it'll probably never give out more than what the single coil is pushing out at the moment combined? ......wait & see?
sorry wheeler ......for the moment I'll keep the details under the hat.
I'll post a picture or two in the next few weeks (give or take) ...hopeful?
I was searching Stefan's site
www.overunity.com and came across a topic called "UNDERSTANDING HOW TESLA DID IT" posted by "Lightwave" .....in it he makes some interesting reading, as per the following:
If you try to get under that weight and lift it up, and just hold it there, you can only get it so high, and continiously expend energy. That's how we normaly (expend) energy, we are continiously pushing.
and this:
Now take that same weight and attatch a spring on it and hang it from some where high, and give it a little push, and then let gravity pull it down further than when you first disturbed it. At this moment, give another push up, with just the same amount of energy, and the weight will go higher. With expending far less energy than originaly, we can "lift" that weight far higher than with brute force.
and this:
you can never brute lift with force as high as you can swing a mass. Just ask David and Giliath. David used logic to "magnify" the force behind the rock.
and this:
Have you actually ever read any of Tesla's patents? If you have, you obviously don't understand any of them. Your thinking is "old school" when you need to think "ancient school". To the anchent's, energy was like "music to the ear".
and lastly this:
If you take that mass held by a spring, and instead ballance it with a rope over a pully to another weight of same size. Very little energy is needed to lift the original weight. By ballancing the weight (just like ballancing the resonance) we can do more work per packet of energy.
