This is the last entry that you will get from me. Most of you do not comprehend the information that I give you. I do not need the ridicule nor some of the abuse that is dished out here.All of you would expect to be treated with respect if you were in my shoes and with my education. jim kelly With higher goals in mind.
Mr. Kelly, weren't you supposed to have made your last "entry"...... three posts ago!
You're clearly not a man of your word!
Or maybe you had one of your credible, convenient memory lapse's again!
Actually I've never wanted more information or details other than james kelly is prepared to offer willingly. That is his right.
However I have a different opinion about Ralph & expect that he will come good on his word & proclaim a working wheel (or not) if one exists. I for one will believe him if he does.
After that, in order to follow their plan for the benefit of kelly & the other two partners they will have to start the patent process. I will be completely comfortable knowing that a working wheel is in existence (at long last) & can wait for the patenting process to take its course & then I will be able to see the details with my own eyes. That would be an interesting moment as the realization of how it worked hit home.
That is of course, unless one of the team does a Bessler & destroys all evidence (once again) but I would think the other partners would be none to happy about that course of action ;)
Sevich wrote:I think he's simply saying this forum and all it's members are not worthy of one iota of his secret being leaked out or revealed. This Bessler forum is not and can never be a place for such revalations to take place. He's labored too long and hard to give away anything of value. And unlike the rest of us suckers who have posted PM researched information on this forum, he will never post or reveal anything to thieves & robbers. For all other's who so much as dare to even look at him will............
Lol...
Sevich...
How very interesting. Thank you for the explanation.
IF it is actually as you explain, then I find that I am 100% with them, in that regard.
"labored" . . . YES!
"suckers" . . . well, not applicable to all here, honestly. These pages have some well-intended, good souls contributing. They know who they are, and so do I.
"thieves & robbers" . . . touchy one this, but it would not surprise me in-the-least as being the very truth of it.
James
Last edited by primemignonite on Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cynic-In-Chief, BesslerWheel (Ret.); Perpetualist First-Class; Iconoclast. "The Iconoclast, like the other mills of God, grinds slowly, but it grinds exceedingly small." - Brann
james kelly wrote:COYLO; You really are just an ass aren't you?
James...
Honestly, Coylo seems to be a whole lot more than what you now dub him as.
His new avatar reveals that he possesses what they call 'Hollywood good looks', and, his writings and observations impress one with being orders above the usual-common.
Let us give credit were credit is due.
We James' really should indulge in nothing less.
Among us men of good will, let peace and comity NOW BREAK FORTH!
James
Cynic-In-Chief, BesslerWheel (Ret.); Perpetualist First-Class; Iconoclast. "The Iconoclast, like the other mills of God, grinds slowly, but it grinds exceedingly small." - Brann
Now, I will explain something until NOW, I have been using 40lb weights. 40 lbs at 36 inches from center produces 120 ft lbs of torque, static. measurable with a scale. when the wheel chock is removed. It drops and starts like a rocket. a wheel chock is used much as an air craft wheel chock. when a wheel which is made of wood begins to get to about 100 or so rpms it starts to come unglued.
james kelly wrote:Now, I will explain something . . .
See? It worked!
Kindness and the carrot always out-produce application of the brutal.
James
Cynic-In-Chief, BesslerWheel (Ret.); Perpetualist First-Class; Iconoclast. "The Iconoclast, like the other mills of God, grinds slowly, but it grinds exceedingly small." - Brann
James are you using rocket fuel? The accelerational rate of gravity under your sized wheel and your torque insures that the r.p.m. you stated is an impossibility.
It only has 120 ft lbs of torque when perfectly horizontal. At 2:00 and 4:00 o'clock (+30 and -30 degrees) it has only about 103 ft lbs of torque while at 1:00 and 5:00 o'clock (+60 and -60 degrees) it has only 60 ft lbs of torque. If there are other weights on the far side then they will counter balance and the net torque will be the sum of the positive and negative torques. The average torque of a 40 lb weight at 36 inches from center falling a half turn from top to bottom will be 76.394 ft lbs. Next you need the same torque to get the weight back to the top.
Wishing you good luck Clarkie. Even though I don't at this time think it is possible I will say that I've learned a lot about physics, engineering and math from the experience and that's a benifit I can use in anything I pursue, it's not a total loss from my perspective.
