Bessler's use of Gravity
Moderator: scott
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
Thankyou Fletcher .
By the way although gravity Is a conservative force I still have hope a way around it will be found ,leading to a rebirth if J B's wonderful discovery.
Graham
By the way although gravity Is a conservative force I still have hope a way around it will be found ,leading to a rebirth if J B's wonderful discovery.
Graham
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
sounds right to me the louder the better in the chain reaction of it all right just as it should be
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
rounder
you and I must have the same design.
Please do not keep putting details on the forum.
If you wish to combine efforts, send a private message.
If not I understand and will not interfere.
It looks like James will be first and he most likely deserves it.
All the details are now out.
Good luck.
And I now believe the system will be finished this year.
you and I must have the same design.
Please do not keep putting details on the forum.
If you wish to combine efforts, send a private message.
If not I understand and will not interfere.
It looks like James will be first and he most likely deserves it.
All the details are now out.
Good luck.
And I now believe the system will be finished this year.
JB Wheeler
it exists I think I found it.
it exists I think I found it.
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
Yes Graham .. I believe it is a conservative force, just like a spring. I think JB used regular materials & well known physics to bend it to his will, to do his bidding if you will.
He was looking in the right direction to find a way to do that, rather than trying to force gravity to do the impossible thru share power of belief (or lack of alternatives) alone, imho.
As for the other boys .. good luck to one & all.
He was looking in the right direction to find a way to do that, rather than trying to force gravity to do the impossible thru share power of belief (or lack of alternatives) alone, imho.
As for the other boys .. good luck to one & all.
Re: re: Bessler's use of Gravity
Gentleman,( most of you anyway)
Ralph here, I have returned home to find that this thread has grown by 6.5 pages since my departure. I have not yet caught up on any other threads as of yet, as I also have 47 private e-mail posts That requires a response.
Of the 6.5 page review, I find that more has been said than done! There are a number of posts that I hope to put in my 2 cents worth, which will require a number of installments.
First there seems to be a belief that I was heading for Indiana, this is in error. I went East to Central Idaho with the intent of proceeding to Indiana if and only if I was notified that there was a need. This did not happen!
From the last 6.5 pages of input I found the following quote from Michael to be the most eye catching as a place to pickup on.
At departure, I made it clear that I would only extend my trip to Indiana if I received word that I would find a wheel in runnable condition when I arrived.
As for Michaels above statement, I will expand on the following. Yes it is possible to lift more than 1.5 pounds with 1 pound at a faster velocity providing that you are speaking relative to each other. As Bessler stated his weights of four times heavier were lifted in a flash. Mr Kelly and myself have discovered how this is accomplished. What Bessler did not make clear is that the term "relative" is highly relevant to this explanation.
Mr, Kelly stated that his wheel had a weight break through the rim. I had the same results with my build! In doing so it also split a length of 1-3/4" thick glue-lam of structural grade in half. Thus allowing the weight mechanism to drop to the bottom of the wheel which also broke through the rim. This was when I decided I was due for a get-away!
Let it be known that I find James Kelly to be a very innovative person, capable of building his own wheels when his health permits. Ovyyus knows what he is talking about!
The second post that caught my attention is from rounder.
All I can say to this is, "It sounds awful familiar" and I could not have said it better.
Ralph
Ralph here, I have returned home to find that this thread has grown by 6.5 pages since my departure. I have not yet caught up on any other threads as of yet, as I also have 47 private e-mail posts That requires a response.
Of the 6.5 page review, I find that more has been said than done! There are a number of posts that I hope to put in my 2 cents worth, which will require a number of installments.
First there seems to be a belief that I was heading for Indiana, this is in error. I went East to Central Idaho with the intent of proceeding to Indiana if and only if I was notified that there was a need. This did not happen!
From the last 6.5 pages of input I found the following quote from Michael to be the most eye catching as a place to pickup on.
Mr Kelly's and my concepts were both derived from a post made by a third party on this forum. He need not have been put wise to what he had revealed, but James Kelly like myself like to have a clear conscience. The third party member will be pulling into my driveway on or about noon Sept. 16th Pacific daylight time. Another reason why I am not in Indiana.Michael wrote:1712 is right Sevich, you cannot make 1.0 lift 1.5 the same distance 1.0 falls - unless the 1.0 is traveling at a faster velocity. To get the 1.0 to travel to that faster velocity requires an energy input that is slightly greater than the energy required to lift the 1.5 to a given distance.
At departure, I made it clear that I would only extend my trip to Indiana if I received word that I would find a wheel in runnable condition when I arrived.
As for Michaels above statement, I will expand on the following. Yes it is possible to lift more than 1.5 pounds with 1 pound at a faster velocity providing that you are speaking relative to each other. As Bessler stated his weights of four times heavier were lifted in a flash. Mr Kelly and myself have discovered how this is accomplished. What Bessler did not make clear is that the term "relative" is highly relevant to this explanation.
Mr, Kelly stated that his wheel had a weight break through the rim. I had the same results with my build! In doing so it also split a length of 1-3/4" thick glue-lam of structural grade in half. Thus allowing the weight mechanism to drop to the bottom of the wheel which also broke through the rim. This was when I decided I was due for a get-away!
Let it be known that I find James Kelly to be a very innovative person, capable of building his own wheels when his health permits. Ovyyus knows what he is talking about!
The second post that caught my attention is from rounder.
--i have a wheel that sounds very simular to what james is saying about his wheel. weights only on the one side running at fast speeds, much faster than the wheel itself. acting almost as a fast hand that can also fly upwards and be much more than it was - when it has to move back down again because of gravity it will almost want to shoot itself backup even higher than it was at its previous state just to repeat the whole scenario over once again. kind of like a slow moving jackhammer
All I can say to this is, "It sounds awful familiar" and I could not have said it better.
Ralph
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
More like the peacocks Head going up and then down-- than its tail feathers i am sure of this.-- good work might i say - the news sounds --------------LIKE TO MUCH TO HEAR ----------- id like to thank you ralph and jimmy for a job than only a few could conceive .it it IT WORKS -sincerely rounder - i would like to type out a big message but i am speechless nothing to say but --- it will work --it has to - its the only way it will work. rounder -god speed
Last edited by rounder on Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ken_behrendt
- Addict
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:45 am
- Location: new jersey, usa
- Contact:
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
Ralph wrote:
and:
So, I guess we conclude from this that James Kelly does not currently have a wheel capable of continuous rotation.
ken
I went East to Central Idaho with the intent of proceeding to Indiana if and only if I was notified that there was a need. This did not happen!
and:
At departure, I made it clear that I would only extend my trip to Indiana if I received word that I would find a wheel in runnable condition when I arrived.
So, I guess we conclude from this that James Kelly does not currently have a wheel capable of continuous rotation.
ken
On 7/6/06, I found, in any overbalanced gravity wheel with rotation rate, ω, axle to CG distance d, and CG dip angle φ, the average vertical velocity of its drive weights is downward and given by:
Vaver = -2(√2)πdωcosφ
Vaver = -2(√2)πdωcosφ
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:04 pm
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
It runs fine KEN, that until it decides to break something. After all it is only wood. Wood can not handle the power that is available.
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
James tells us :
It's like putting a 350 cu in v8 in an old Model T.
Use smaller weights .
Graham
Why would you use heavier weights than your wooden wheel can handle ?It runs fine KEN, that until it decides to break something. After all it is only wood. Wood can not handle the power that is available.
It's like putting a 350 cu in v8 in an old Model T.
Use smaller weights .
Graham
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
.....ya..........i hate when that happens, a purest would use a Ford........:)
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:04 pm
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
DONEthat did that, been there,There is little glory in being at this stage. It is the Lord's Glory any way. Ralph and I are here simply by HIS Grace.Mine Here, which is ours. has turned as many as 6 turns, before it broke something. It seemingly does so with very little effort. we three shall work it out. amen
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:04 pm
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
RACER; FORD fix or repair daily! lol SEE you guy!
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
i detent say i would.................i love my small blocks .............:)
Re: re: Bessler's use of Gravity
May I suggest that instead of all the name dropping and drama, that you just build a working wheel?rlortie wrote:
Let it be known that I find James Kelly to be a very innovative person, capable of building his own wheels when his health permits. Ovyyus knows what he is talking about. Ralph
PS: How were things on the potato farm?
LOL
WarHammer
"The louder he spoke of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons." Emerson
"The history of our race, and each individual's experience, are sown thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal. " Twain
"The history of our race, and each individual's experience, are sown thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal. " Twain
re: Bessler's use of Gravity
Make it out of steel, use lighter weights. Where are the problems?