Question for Scott

Miscellaneous news and views...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

Scott, I debated sending this to you as a private email, but was wondering if anyone else had noted the same thing. Everytime I look at a thread, the number of views goes up by at least two. Something wrong with the program or is it something at my end?

Regards,

Michael
meChANical Man.
--------------------
"All things move according to the whims of the great magnet"; Hunter S. Thompson.
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

re: Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

Hi Scott,

Yeah somethings really messed up. I looked at the member list and ordered it to the ten most posters and it gave names that never post.

Michael
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

re: Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

Actually forget about that last part, I justr had the ascending order wrong.

Mike
User avatar
Jonathan
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2453
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:29 am
Location: Tucson, Az

re: Question for Scott

Post by Jonathan »

I think I know what is happening. I just looked at this thread when the count was 47, and went back to general discussion immediately to find it saying 51. Then I did it again and it only went up one. I think that as people are popping in and out of the site and looking at things for just a moment that sometimes people are looking at the same thing at the same time, so that the counts go up faster. This would occur even when the people online counter says there is no one but yourself, because people can come and go in less than 15 seconds, but it is accurate only to five minutes.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

re: Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

No, seriously jonathan go to a thread that hasn't been touched in a while. Click on it, then click on general dsicussion, and you'll see the meter has registered a count of two more.

Regards,

Michael


Hmmm, now they aren't going up at all. Scott must be playing with it at the moment.
User avatar
Jonathan
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2453
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:29 am
Location: Tucson, Az

re: Question for Scott

Post by Jonathan »

I just did what you said twice (each on a different far back topic) and they both incremented correctly.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
User avatar
MrTim
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:05 pm
Location: "Excellent!" Besslerwheel.com's C. Montgomery Burns
Contact:

re: Question for Scott

Post by MrTim »

Multiple increments? Maybe Joel Wright is involved somehow! ;)
"....the mechanism is so simple that even a wheel may be too small to contain it...."
"Sometimes the harder you look the better it hides." - Dilbert's garbageman
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

re: Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

Hi Jonathan,

I don't know, it's strange. After I wrote that I noticed that really old threads don't go up at all. Newer ones are still going up by two.

Regards,

Michael
User avatar
scott
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 7:05 am
Location: Colorado
Contact:

re: Question for Scott

Post by scott »

Hi Michael, sorry that the site doesn't seem to be working quite right for you. When I tried it the counts incremented correctly (like for Jonathan). I guess that it is possible that different people could see different behavior based on the details of their Internet connection or something, but it's hard for me to imagine just how that would happen. In any case, unless more people out there are seeing it, I'm going to go on the assumption that it's isolated problem.
Thanks,
Scott
User avatar
Michael
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 6:10 pm
Location: Victoria

re: Question for Scott

Post by Michael »

Hmmm, okay Scott. All I know though is, I just sat not doing anything, and picked out the woodwork thread. I hit refresh and the numbers didn't go up. I then clicked on the thread and then immediately clicked to the general forum, and it went fro, 434 to 436.

Regards,

Michael
Post Reply