gravity devices work (anti gravity rant as well with patents)

[epistemologicide]

one of my 'contacts' has passed this onto me, interesting read, i havent looked up the patents yet...

As a holder of 3 gravity patents, I can tell you that they work US5685196 Inertial Propulsion Plus is really a hybrid antigravity propulsion device that works by definition and I have working models. The Reaction is between the craft and the weight(s) rather than to push against the Earth which wastes the Reaction. US6234267 and US6612934 use an activated counterweight to use Gravity as the opposite force and make it action/action Motors will come up to speed in half the time.Weight must be applied fresh just as Start/accel occurs or else Reset by lift counterweight and release but while reaching from the opposite side or use cantilever.. Motor or engine otherwise wastes 1/2 the energy while the load,machine or wheels waste 1/2 of the 1/2 they receive or a total of 3/4th of the energy. This has always happened long before Newton and Einstein & sadly ever since/ They didn't know that the Reaction does move the Earth and waste up to 3/4th the energy. A motor 1/4th the size can have the same performance.

Hybrid cars can save all the braking energy instead of 1/2 and can save all the speed-up energy instead of zero or zilch, Patent licenses available and lets get busy Wake up call...-

[Oxygon]

Hey Epi, been a while...

inertial thruster...?

hybrid cars that save more energy...?

...

Whats up Epi...?

your post is short/abrupt and I am not sure how you expect people to respond...?

((I still really think we do need a "general energy" forum))

[Sevich]

Hi Epi,

Oxy's signature

"Something incredible is awaiting to be known"

Carl Sargan

Could it be 2004 as opposed to 2010 as the year we make contact with PM ?

Nevertheless I feel something wonderful is about to happen on Besslerwheel.com

[Kirk]

It will be this year.

[Neo]

This year it is...

[joppa]

Actually, this fall, perhaps.

[Neo]

No right now...

[joppa]

In what form? I should have noted that I was referring to a Bessler wheel.

[Jonathan]

Well nothing's going to happen if we sit here just saying it will.
Is there a link for that or something Epi? I'll look at the patents if I get the time. This is not true:

They didn't know that the Reaction does move the Earth and waste up to 3/4th the energy.

This was/is known, but largely ignored because 1) it is believed to be impossible to eliminate it and 2) the amount of energy lost to the earth in that fashion is inversely proportional to the mass of the earth, and so is infinitesimal.

[joppa]

;^)

[Kirk]

In what form? I should have noted that I was referring to a Bessler wheel.

Depends on what you mean by form. Once you see what Bessler was doing you can implement the same effect differently. We have materials available to us like titanium alloys whereas Bessler had wood etc. Our tools are better too.

[Stewart]

Once you see what Bessler was doing you can implement the same effect differently.

Bessler himself did just that. He says somewhere in AP (can't find the relevant quote right now) that the mechanisms in each of his wheels were different. Once he had "the principle" he was able to apply it in different ways in his wheels. He perfected the mechanism and could get his wheels to work just how he wanted - providing as much or as little power as required. I'm sure it will be the same for us once we re-discover "the principle".

Stewart

[epistemologicide]

the latest addition to my hordes of free energy 'contacts' that will sworm the globe in the comming months especially with 'education' for my company panacea

is this individual

Richard Foster/ Engineer

and works with gravity patents.

with working models for some time now. Gravity which is abundant, free and as yet untaxded will block reaction and motor will come up to speed in 1/2 the time. We waste 3/4th of our energy when accel or decel.A motor 1/4 the size has the same performance.

http://www.intersurf.com/~propul/index.htm

[epistemologicide]

United States Patent 6,237,342
Hurford May 29, 2001

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravity motor


Abstract
A gravity motor which is formed of at least one motor unit which has at least
one motor member fixed to an output shaft. The output shaft is rotationally
mounted on a housing. The housing includes a guide surface. The motor member is
low frictionally longitudinally movable relative to an output shaft. Each end of
the motor member includes a weighted follower which is low frictionally movable
relative to a guide surface. The rotation of the motor unit will cause one
weighted follower to be moved toward the output shaft by the guide surface with
the opposite weighted follower of the motor member being moved away from the
output shaft. The result is gravity produces an overall clockwise torque on the
motor member which causes rotation of the output shaft.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors: Hurford; John J. (4716 Canterbury St., Westlake Village, CA
91362)
Appl. No.: 569582
Filed: May 11, 2000

Current U.S. Class: 60/721
Intern'l Class: F01K 001/00
Field of Search: 60/639,675,721



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References Cited [Referenced By]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Patent Documents
4195483 Apr., 1980 Myers, Sr. et al. 60/675.
4372123 Feb., 1983 Austin 60/675.
4385497 May., 1983 Scott 60/639.
5873249 Feb., 1999 Alkhami 60/639.

Primary Examiner: Nguyen; Hoang
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Jack Munro, Patent Agent

[Jonathan]

For those without TIF viewers, see this attachment of the first page of that patent. I think it's just like MT12,23.
EDIT
That came out way bigger than I thought it would, here is a smaller one, though with reduced resolution.