Of the members here, Who has hit on some of your key features of your secrete designs?
For me, I would have to say LIB and Funwithgravity. Good thing they both have many posts. ;)
The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Moderator: scott
-
justsomeone
- Addict
- Posts: 2102
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm
-
FunWithGravity2
- Devotee
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:32 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
I always think ralph and Jim are working on the same things i am, but i have come to realise its because Ralph talks in circles so it makes you think he is working in your vicinity, until weeks later you realise he was not even close.
My top percieved threats are
Myself
Jim Mich
Pequaide
Greendoor
LIB
Michael
And those i worry the least about
A
J
J
J
R
D
B
Full names omitted to avoid what will still turn into a name calling thread
Crazy Dave
My top percieved threats are
Myself
Jim Mich
Pequaide
Greendoor
LIB
Michael
And those i worry the least about
A
J
J
J
R
D
B
Full names omitted to avoid what will still turn into a name calling thread
Crazy Dave
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
There is a chance that jim_mich and I may be working on something similar.
We differ in perspective regarding Cf and Cp, I do not believe you can draw energy from Cf where as Cp can produce AM and velocity.
Yes I work in circles, they are called wheels. :-) Why does it seem I work in circles? Because I look at everything opposite of most here, which makes it hard to define exactly where I am going.
As for the subject of this thread, I am not aware of anyone working on the key features of what Arrache is currently researching. I do not perceive any as threats.
That is not to say that some one smarter or by accident will be first to present a runner based on their own design.
When some one posts that they can create positive static torque measured on the ascending side, then I would show concern.
Ralph
We differ in perspective regarding Cf and Cp, I do not believe you can draw energy from Cf where as Cp can produce AM and velocity.
Yes I work in circles, they are called wheels. :-) Why does it seem I work in circles? Because I look at everything opposite of most here, which makes it hard to define exactly where I am going.
As for the subject of this thread, I am not aware of anyone working on the key features of what Arrache is currently researching. I do not perceive any as threats.
That is not to say that some one smarter or by accident will be first to present a runner based on their own design.
When some one posts that they can create positive static torque measured on the ascending side, then I would show concern.
Ralph
-
james kelly
- Aficionado
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:04 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Ralph, Don't give away secrets . You're nuts.
Most everyone is working on a wheel. I'm working on a wheel!
Most everyone has weights within their wheel. My wheel has weights!
Most everyone has the weights that moving, shift or swinging. My wheel has the weights that moving, shift or swinging!
Centrifugal forces will affect everyone's rotating wheel to some degree or another. Centrifugal forces affect the motion of the weights in my wheel!
Everyone must be working on the same idea I'm working on!
(Sarcasm intentionally intended!)
Most everyone has weights within their wheel. My wheel has weights!
Most everyone has the weights that moving, shift or swinging. My wheel has the weights that moving, shift or swinging!
Centrifugal forces will affect everyone's rotating wheel to some degree or another. Centrifugal forces affect the motion of the weights in my wheel!
Everyone must be working on the same idea I'm working on!
(Sarcasm intentionally intended!)
-
FunWithGravity
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:05 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Dam it Jim that is my wheel. :(
I always knew. LOL
Dave
I always knew. LOL
Dave
A great discovery solves a great problem, but there is a grain of discovery in the solution of any problem.
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
From what I've seen nobodies wheel designs are similar to mine. Every time I think someone might be heading down the road I'm on they go off on a separate path.
As far as I can tell, no one else has described the principle which I believe will make my wheel run.
Now if I could only find the time to finish working on the newest iteration of the design...
E
As far as I can tell, no one else has described the principle which I believe will make my wheel run.
Now if I could only find the time to finish working on the newest iteration of the design...
E
-
justsomeone
- Addict
- Posts: 2102
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Hi Crazy Dave. I'm a J. ;)
-
FunWithGravity2
- Devotee
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:32 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Hello Justsomeone J but you are not
John Collins
James Kelley
or
Jim Lindgard
OOPs i said it ;o
Ralp said
"Yes I work in circles, they are called wheels. :-) Why does it seem I work in circles? Because I look at everything opposite of most here, which makes it hard to define exactly where I am going."
No ralph, it would be because you make very vague open ended statements that can be interpreted in many ways. Until whoever it is your talking to sets definitive terms you pretend to have a vague idea of what they are talking about until you are asked directly and point blank. You would usually acuse others of fishing with this technique i believe. I still await an answer to whether any members of ARRACHE have their names on any provisional paent applications with a recieved postcard from the USPTO of are any of you named on full applications or previously granted patents. Since your starting an invention development firm i believe that would be a pertinent question.
John Collins
James Kelley
or
Jim Lindgard
OOPs i said it ;o
Ralp said
"Yes I work in circles, they are called wheels. :-) Why does it seem I work in circles? Because I look at everything opposite of most here, which makes it hard to define exactly where I am going."
No ralph, it would be because you make very vague open ended statements that can be interpreted in many ways. Until whoever it is your talking to sets definitive terms you pretend to have a vague idea of what they are talking about until you are asked directly and point blank. You would usually acuse others of fishing with this technique i believe. I still await an answer to whether any members of ARRACHE have their names on any provisional paent applications with a recieved postcard from the USPTO of are any of you named on full applications or previously granted patents. Since your starting an invention development firm i believe that would be a pertinent question.
-
justsomeone
- Addict
- Posts: 2102
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Sorry Dave but one of those J's, I believe, has a good chance even though he may not be good at math or writing. :)
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
funwithgravity wrote'
When I am asked definitive questions I answer to the best of my knowledge providing it does not relate to confidential material, and yes a direct question can be considered 'fishing', other wise there would be no need to put the question fourth.
I accuse everyone on this forum of 'fishing'. IMO we are all fishing in one form or another, I do not consider myself to be any different. This forum is a fishing hole which all who visit try their luck.
The title of this thread; 'The key features of your secret wheel designs' is an obvious fishing thread/line. The question is; what is each involved member using for bait? I believe your input and questions validate my statement.
To my knowledge no one making up 'Arrache' has their names on a provisional patent or any other related USPTO document.
When one is employed and comes up with a patentable product, it is the priority of the employer, otherwise; yes I would hold more than one patent. I have the certificates of achievement and sustained performance awards (SPA) to back my claims. Unfortunately I have invested the monetary recognition into my research facilities and medical expenses.
I do not see the relevance in this question. When asked if I was a proficient fisherman the answer was no, until I caught my first fish. There is always a first time no matter what you experience.
The fact that we do not hold a patent is not to imply that the resources, skills and knowledge to acquire or assist in obtaining a patent is not at our disposal.
Ralph Lortie
As for my open ended statements I have a good posthumous teacher, his name is Johann Elias Bessler. He was very good at making statements open to interpretation, I have studied his tactics well!No ralph, it would be because you make very vague open ended statements that can be interpreted in many ways. Until whoever it is your talking to sets definitive terms you pretend to have a vague idea of what they are talking about until you are asked directly and point blank. You would usually acuse others of fishing with this technique i believe. I still await an answer to whether any members of ARRACHE have their names on any provisional paent applications with a recieved postcard from the USPTO of are any of you named on full applications or previously granted patents.
When I am asked definitive questions I answer to the best of my knowledge providing it does not relate to confidential material, and yes a direct question can be considered 'fishing', other wise there would be no need to put the question fourth.
I accuse everyone on this forum of 'fishing'. IMO we are all fishing in one form or another, I do not consider myself to be any different. This forum is a fishing hole which all who visit try their luck.
The title of this thread; 'The key features of your secret wheel designs' is an obvious fishing thread/line. The question is; what is each involved member using for bait? I believe your input and questions validate my statement.
It is a research development enterprise/venture which we hope will lead to inventions. We are not into developing inventors, we assist those that possibly could become an inventor but lack the skills or resources.Since your starting an invention development firm i believe that would be a pertinent question
To my knowledge no one making up 'Arrache' has their names on a provisional patent or any other related USPTO document.
When one is employed and comes up with a patentable product, it is the priority of the employer, otherwise; yes I would hold more than one patent. I have the certificates of achievement and sustained performance awards (SPA) to back my claims. Unfortunately I have invested the monetary recognition into my research facilities and medical expenses.
I do not see the relevance in this question. When asked if I was a proficient fisherman the answer was no, until I caught my first fish. There is always a first time no matter what you experience.
The fact that we do not hold a patent is not to imply that the resources, skills and knowledge to acquire or assist in obtaining a patent is not at our disposal.
Ralph Lortie
-
justsomeone
- Addict
- Posts: 2102
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:21 pm
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
No Ralph, we are not all working on the same basic idea.
We are working off the same clues, the same eye witness accounts
and yes a round circle with an axle, but there are 1000's of different
ways to approach this. For instance, using one disc or making use of two
discs. , a through axle or a split axle and the number of weights used
( same size or different size ). Many variables. John Collins said he was
using five mechanisms. I never had a design that used five mechanisms.
I have designs that are unlike any other that I know of. Others do also.
What I was wondering is if anyone else has hinted toward an UNIQUE part
of a private design. No need in saying what that part was.
We are working off the same clues, the same eye witness accounts
and yes a round circle with an axle, but there are 1000's of different
ways to approach this. For instance, using one disc or making use of two
discs. , a through axle or a split axle and the number of weights used
( same size or different size ). Many variables. John Collins said he was
using five mechanisms. I never had a design that used five mechanisms.
I have designs that are unlike any other that I know of. Others do also.
What I was wondering is if anyone else has hinted toward an UNIQUE part
of a private design. No need in saying what that part was.
re: The key features of your secrete wheel designs
Probably 10001 ways but it still sounds 'basic' to me!We are working off the same clues, the same eye witness accounts
and yes a round circle with an axle, but there are 1000's of different
ways to approach this
Ralph