My Universal Gravity Wheel IS a runner...

[raj]

My Universal Gravity Wheel IS a runner, and unlike Bessler, I want to show the world how it works.
Where do I start?
Which Scientific Authority I should convince first, and how?
PLEASE advise...
With Thanks.
Raj

[nicbordeaux]

Raj, if you have a runner, congratulations. If you want to show the world, eg, give away, don't worry, don't approach anybody.

Film the gizmo very clearly running. then show all the component parts. Reassemble under vid. Start it and film for a long time.

Put the vid files and the drawings and detailled specs on CD x 25 . Post one to yourself registered delivery. Give 23 to other people with instructions to pass them on to other people who will open them and publish on youtube if at a given date you do or don't give a signal (your call). Any number of variations possible. Open blogs from different locations, put the material up there with a publication date set to some time in the future.

Put the full footage described above on youtube or other vid hosting and post the link here.

Your ass is more or less covered. You can get into encryption, but that's more complex. You can bury stuff too.

Nick

yes, CD number 25 you post to me one month before doing any of the above ;-)

[raj]

Thanks Nick,
What you advised should be the last option, because like the hundreds of runners already splashed on youtube , all end up as perpetual discussions, mostly by non-scientifics like me, and accusations of scams are very common.
It is a long and winding endless road to recognition as a runner.
What is the fastest route to proving a runner, and what are the authorities, if any, to whom proof of working in visu will suffice?
I am searching for quickest recognition as a runner.
But what you advised will be done all the same.
Thanks again.
Raj

[justsomeone]

Congratulations! Can you tell us if it has excess power to do work?

Size?

Number of weights?

Self starter?

[raj]

The answer is yes.
See all my postings on this forum, since December last.

[nicbordeaux]

Come on raj, the youtube vid is for the serious guys to look at and understand. if you are publishing full spec, anybody reasonably competent will replicate it and there will be no debate. You will have powerful allies the world over. Just disable the comments on youtube or whatever so that the idiots don't upset you and give themselves pleasure with their stupid comments :-)

If you really want to follow another route at your risk and peril, send the material to just one person.

For that you will have to stand up here and say that you have physically built a working gravity powered wheel which has no preload or external drive. I'd guess some people will contact you.

If it's a drawing you have, or an incomplete device which "should work" but you can't quite make it, you can still ask for somebody here to help you.

Those are your choices, because you aren't going to write to Nasa or anybody and say "Look here guys, it's like this, I have a real working perpetual motion device".

Good luck.

[raj]

Nick, for one thing you are right.
I can't build it yet. I am a 65 year-old on 100 GBP retirement pension.
I have saved 8 GBP in two months to buy 3 tiny diametrically magnetised cylinders from UK to use as weights in my first part test of my Universal Gravity Wheel.
On top of that I do not have mechanical facilities or expertise needed to do a good build.
But still, I am working on it, albeit in a very slow pace, and I hope to present a full working prototype by the end of the year.
One thing I do not understand is why a build is required first to be shown on youtube, for some good samaritan to want to replicate it when complete details of workings have been given.
Is it not sufficient for any genuine interested person to build and test a device by just following the complete description and details given by the inventor. Of course, a prior unbiased theoritical analysis of the invention must have been carried out and proven satisfactory first.
I am tempted to stake my life to prove my Universal Gravity Wheel is a runner.
I pray that I lived long enough prove that.
So I reiterate my original question. What is the shortest route to recognition as a runner?

[Art]

Raj,

You could always sell the plans for $49.95 .

Everybody that buys the plans will broadcast your name far and wide - and you will get some useful pocket money out of it .

No more PMT too !

[raj]

Hello Art,
I do not sincerely want my precious invention to be treated wrongly as 'SCAMS' on the cheap.

[rlortie]

My Universal Gravity Wheel IS a runner, and unlike Bessler, I want to show the world how it works.
Where do I start?
Which Scientific Authority I should convince first, and how?
PLEASE advise...
With Thanks.
Raj

Raj,

Apparently you are not aware of http://www.arrache.org/

I would be happy to review your design and build it for you providing you can either convince or show reasonable doubt as t why it should run.

As for spending 8 GBP in two months to buy 3 tiny diametrically magnetized cylinders. we have magnets by the box load of polarized in just about any shape and direction possible.

Ralph

[raj]

I know that my search for recognition for my Universal Gravity Wheel won't be easy.
I , only, have to see the trouble Steorn is going through for years now, having spent huge sums in prototypings and worldclass top scientists to prove they have a runner, but still has not got the validation sought.
All I can really do and expect, after all said, is to build my working prototype at my own slow pace and put it on public display, but unlike Bessler, all uncovered.
Thank you all for your advice.
Bye for now.
Raj

[John Collins]

I don't get it Raj, have you or have you not built a working model yet?

First you say:-

My Universal Gravity Wheel IS a runner, and unlike Bessler, I want to show the world how it works.

Then you say:-

I hope to present a full working prototype by the end of the year.

If you haven't built it yet then you have nothing except some ideas just like the rest of us. If you have got a working prototype get some one like Ralph or Fletch (or me) to validate it.

JC

[jim_mich]

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009

You ALL call yourselves BIG SHOTS in gravity wheels and perpetual motion machines, studying, analysing and pretending to know more than anybody else on Bessler's so-called famous wheel and the hundreds of other and own designs that you all refer to, continuously, in this forum.

I INVITED you all to comment on my gravity wheel, having done more that anybody on this forum, by unashamedly, disclosing my complete concept with drawings and description on how it works.

And you all found NOTHING to say.

I can only guess the reason of your silence.

I thank all for letting me on this forum for a few days.

THIS IS my last post.

My Universal Gravity Wheel IS a runner, and unlike Bessler, I want to show the world how it works.
Where do I start?
Which Scientific Authority I should convince first, and how?
PLEASE advise...
With Thanks.
Raj

I can't build it yet. I am a 65 year-old on 100 GBP retirement pension.
I have saved 8 GBP in two months to buy 3 tiny diametrically magnetised cylinders from UK to use as weights in my first part test of my Universal Gravity Wheel.
On top of that I do not have mechanical facilities or expertise needed to do a good build.
But still, I am working on it, albeit in a very slow pace, and I hope to present a full working prototype by the end of the year.
One thing I do not understand is why a build is required first to be shown on youtube, for some good samaritan to want to replicate it when complete details of workings have been given.
Is it not sufficient for any genuine interested person to build and test a device by just following the complete description and details given by the inventor. Of course, a prior unbiased theoritical analysis of the invention must have been carried out and proven satisfactory first.
I am tempted to stake my life to prove my Universal Gravity Wheel is a runner.
I pray that I lived long enough prove that.
So I reiterate my original question. What is the shortest route to recognition as a runner?

The shortest route to recognition as a runner is to simply build a working wheel. There is no other choice. If you are unable to physically build it then you need to convince others to build it for you. But if you continue to claim that your concept is a real working wheel then you are committing fraud. You will never know for sure whether your concept actually works as intended until you or someone builds it.

[raj]

Hello Ralph,
I thought I was going to close this topic, but then I found your advice.
Your advice and offer is the best I could have expected.
Oh, yes. Please help me out with a build, and I am open to a genuine partnership if that be your wish.
I am posting complete specifications, including full descriptions and drawings of my Universal Gravity Wheel and Balkee Wheel since December, 2009.
These should be sufficient for anybody in this field, to carry out an unbiased theorical validation analysis of the invention and once convinced, proceed to build the device. I shall be available to give explicit details where needed.
In order to achieve this we shall need an open mind.
My Universal Gravity Wheel is an Overbalanced Wheel System.
As far as I have learnt, if there is a net positive torque acting continuously on the same side of a wheel, we have a runner.
Overbalanced wheel uses sifting weights about the wheel to maintain torque.
Gravity help sift weights only vertically perpendicular to earth surface, and as such cannot alone sift weights to maintain torque. Therefore it is agreed that there should be at least another force to help with the sifting of weights.
Several other forces have been proposed, example: springs.
But the crucial question is where should this extra force be. I believe that this extra force should be part and parcel of the wheel, turning and sifting with the wheel.
I am using magnets as that extra force provider. Magnetic force works well when poles face each other diametrically.
Magnetic force can be made to act in any direction, by making the poles face each other at the required place.
In my Universal Gravity Wheel Design, gravitational force is used to shift weights mainly vertically and magnetic force to shift weights mainly horizontally about the wheel as it rotates due to net positive torque.
The complete workings of my universal gravity wheel is already on this forum.
Well Ralph, I am open to any relative question that you may have.
Once again, I thank you for your offer to build my UGW, and I look forward to work with you.
Failing that, I shall persevere by myself till I bring it in public show.
The

[raj]

Jim,
I am only the upteenth member of this forum to claim to have a runner. Some are making this claim for years, including yourself.
Raj