I will not be posting the hamster in the middle wheel inside the V wheels, as a large hamster is crossing over the axle and the backing forces would I believe cause a jam, there is not enough rope distance to make a small hamster work so I give up with this design and return to the hamster at the start of this thread.
(Edit, path_finder wrote,)
I think the V wheels design is a horses for courses design, wherein cross over axle weight shifts designs are out, but more simple weight shift designs are in!Dear all,
After some additional studies I came to this conclusion: the 'V' disks wheel is nothing else than a Nth version of the CAM design.
On a theoretical point of view the angular position of the two disks is an artificial way to inform the inner of the wheel of the 3:00 position versus the earth ground
For sure this way is much more simpler than passing through a shaft through the central axle, and this is why this configuration seems to be more attractive.
There is an advantage of the V wheels that should not be over looked see quote below.
(Edit, Trevor Wrote,)
Path_finder, thank you very much for your input here.If you look at the above design I have not asked the V wheels to do any direct lifting, its more like pulling the weights over, there is another advantage in that design wherein when pulling the weight over will transfer some of that weight to a outer position on the V wheels.
With thanks Trevor