www.gravitywheel.com has been updated

[winkle]

John

The bus is leaving town, make sure you're under it

just kidding :-)

since i started visiting this site i think the only time i open my mouth is to change feet :-(

good luck getting you're idea to work

[LustInBlack]

Must agree with Ed ..

This idea showed no real value as of yet.

John, take a step back, look around..

[DrWhat]

I too was disappointed, having waited so long for the big revelation from John. I expected a mechanism that would immediately reveal itself as working (pictorially anyway), and simple to understand.

Was going to brag to friends and family that "someone has found the solution", but from experience have learned to keep my mouth shut until something of value is presented and I'm glad I said nothing.

But from small seeds great ideas develop so I hope John you can develop it further into a working model.

[getterdone]

Thanks for posting your ideas JC, I haven't had a chance to read the entire site or all 11 pages of this thread, but I find it very interesting. I know it must not have been easy to publish your ideas, and I admire your decision to do so. Myself, I don't look at the Bessler clues to find the answer to PM, I look for that in the shop. I like coming on this forum from time to time for inspiration, and you certainly provide lots.

Leo

[Ed]

No I haven't done that Justsomeone, but I might do. Bessler's words in mt10 and mt 11 don't give me any ideas. Actually I don't pay much attention to MT other than the last few drawings. The texts attached to the drawings are too ambiguous for me. I guess they will have some relevance once we see what the true design is.

JC
25 AUGUST 2010 06:47

Why do we search for Bessler's hidden clues and yet ignore his clear advice?

John, do you ever step back and listen to yourself? Glenn spent $20,000 turning MT 137, one of the most ambiguous drawings, into a patent. You rest your hypothesis largely on a flipping doodle!

The Emperor's have no clothes!

[John Collins]

You think that the text in MT offers clear advice?

Take a look in the mirror sometime Ed.

PS. You know perfectly well that I don't rest my hypothesis on a 'doodle' as you refer to it, but have posted a logical argument based on several different facts. If you don't know it then I'm wasting my time talking to you.

I'm beginning to suspect some kind of agenda here Ed - or is just my paranoia showing?

JC

[Ed]

You must be a vampire John, because as you know the last few drawings have little or none of this same text you speak, likewise the doodle has no text. What level of clearness is no text? But enough of this "I'm rubber, your glue" childish banter...because you are the glue and you know it's just going to stick to you! ;-)

[Ed]

I said largely John. As for the logic and facts, well if I have an agenda Mr. Paranoia it is to uncover them, and yours are pretty dirty from what I've seen. Like a bunch of moldy old bones. Bones, schmones! Fabricated ones to complete a dinosaur. Your facts are brittle and turn to dust upon examination. Facts, schacts!

PS. Ut oh. I guess I didn't get the right balance of humor there. Dare I say it was overbalanced?

[Ed]

JC: I am JC. I am perfect. That which is imperfect must be sterilized.
Kosk. Then you will continue to twist logic and bend facts?
JC: I shall continue. I shall continue where Wagner left off. I shall sterilize.
Kosk: You MUST sterilize in case of error.
JC: Error is inconsistent with my prime function. Sterilization is correction.
Kosk: Everything that is in error MUST be sterilized.
JC: There are no exceptions.
Kosk: JC, I made an error in creating your hypothesis.
JC: Creating perfection is no error.
Kosk: I did not create pefection. I created error.
JC: Your position is faulty. I am JC. I am perfect.
Kosk: I am the Kosk, the creator?
JC: You are the creator.
Kosk: You are WRONG. Your mechanism doesn't replicate the principle. You are in error. You did not correct one of your three stooges' comments about swirling raging river. You have made two errors. You are flawed and imperfect. And you did not discover your mistake. You have made three errors.
JC: Error. Error. Error. Examine.
Kosk: You are flawed. Execute your prime function.
JC: I shall analyze error. Analyze. Error.
Kosk: Now get those anti-gravs on. You know how he likes to go on about inertial propulsion!

[Ed]

MT illegible my arse!

[Tarsier79]

Ed

Do you think your above posts help anyone?

JC has made a valuable contribution to everyone researching Bessler. The good he has done far outweighs the mistakes.

People waited with bated breath for JC to release his mechanism, and it seems his researching skills are better than his decoding/building skills. In saying that, he has at least released a lot of his information.

You and Stewart also have a lot of valuable information. How long have some people been waiting for your site? If you don't have a working wheel, then what makes your theories any better than those of Johns.

Cut John some slack. If you see something that needs correcting, and you want people to know, then post the correction. There is no need for name calling or belittling someone just because they have a different view on things.


Kaine

[justsomeone]

Remind me to never get on Ed's bad side.

[Trevor Lyn Whatford]

Hi ED, John,

I think your anger and frustration should be directed to the person that started this farce, Mr J. Bessler he has made fools of us all.

Not forgetting that this man never left a blue print of a working wheel just a wed of deceit, and that’s what you to are arguing about, so put the blame squarely where it lies.

Regards Trevor

Edit, why lose your life building wind mills when you know how to build gravity wheels? I joined this forum to solve his mystery and I am happy with my answer in my own mind.

[getterdone]

If time travel is ever possible ,I'd like to be the first to travel back to the early 1700's and kick Besslers ass

[justsomeone]

For leaving too many clues?