Report on a remote viewing carried out for me in 2008

[path_finder]

Dear Marv,

Target appears to be a structure or object close to or containing water

Can your RV be corelated with this concept?:
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewt ... 5439#55439

[daxwc]

Marv, in your best honest opinion, do you really believe you are seeing 1712. Or are you possibly reading brain waves that come directly from Puthof and his knowledge and conceptual ideas on the subject?

Since you are dodging the question; I’ll take that as you are unsure and don’t know.

[murilo]

My 2cts:
I guess that the cue has not been well formulated.

A passing person is there.

The mill is there, so as a detail about accident instant, a lever.

To see - since I'm not JB specialist - is if that mill is moved by water - at least water auxiliary driven or pumping - what one can understand to be in the set.

I guess that a lot of things that would/could be seen are in the report. For general, the viewer brings to the interested person things that are to be of significance to the questioner.

Where are all the sent draws?

Congratulations, Marv! Are you able to 'view' also to future events?

Best!
Murilo

[Ealadha]

A question for you marv , do you think reincarnation is true ? And if so , would you know if it is possible to find where Johann Bessler is by remote viewing ?
You see , my idea is to find Johann Bessler and ask him how the wheel works . :)

[daxwc]

Ealadha here is a nickel, now go play in the heavy traffic.

[dazsmtih]

Hi,
Guys, my name is Daz smith.
I was the project manager for this project and can also answer any questions that you may have.

All the best..
Daz

[eccentrically1]

dazsmtih

Can you tell where I am, psychically?

[John Collins]

Hey guys, I asked Daz for permission to publish his report which he kindly gave me, now he has come here to answer any questions you may have. Treat him with respect please.

JC

[Fletcher]

Hi daz & marv ..

I'd be interested if you have conducted double blind experiments ?

1. where the 'tasker' doesn't know any background & just gives you the 2 sets of numbers.

2. where the tasker [as appears in this case] does have knowledge.

The point being to rule out you receiving your information from the tasker.

I have no doubt that the tasker told you nothing & was professional but I wonder, as dax did, if you are picking up information from his awareness of the target etc - a tasker not aware of the subject could remove this objection out of the equation ?

The protocol might be that the project coordinator would have to be separate from the tasker & have never had contact with the panel, & the panel would need to not know who the project coordinator was.

[John Collins]

Good question Fletch.

I'm still uncomfortable with the concept of remote viewing backwards in time and I cannot rule out the possibility of the the potential to 'read' information from someone still alive.

JC

[daxwc]

We are all aware of cell phones and the waves that are needed to communicate. Brains produce signals and waves; so it is not that far out of our own realm of reality that they might be read. Going back in time is a far different subject matter, so I wondering personal opinions of the viewers.

Daz, I count 4 viewers on the main report, that being R,M,G and J. At the end of the report it says “Five of the viewers mentioned a male being involved with the target. “ So begs the question… how many viewers started and why was not all the reports produced?

[dazsmtih]

Guys, I'm more than happy to have a serious debate or discussion - but the moment it gets silly, I will be out of here.

Fletcher,
Yes we always try work work at least single blind - but most of the time we do know the tasker of the target and project.
I have worked many rv targets for 14 years and for the last three years have done many public rv projects.

I also recently started getting paid for remoet viewing work. I work with a rule that if the clients doesn't get the answer to their question - they do not pay. I've had 11 paying clients so far in the last year and they all paid.

1. where the 'tasker' doesn't know any background & just gives you the 2 sets of numbers.

Most 90% of remote viewing is done this way - if you get good/proper remoet viewers. Like anything in life there are those who break the rules and dont do it properly we do and in projects the remoet viewers only get the random number to focus upon.

The point being to rule out you receiving your information from the tasker.

I have never given out extra information to viewers in blind projects.
Now does the remoet viewer have a telepathic link to the tasker - this is hotly debated within RV and unknown. Its my belief than everyone involved in the project including all people in the future who read the results - are linked at some level.

I have no doubt that the tasker told you nothing & was professional but I wonder, as dax did, if you are picking up information from his awareness of the target etc - a tasker not aware of the subject could remove this objection out of the equation ?

The protocol might be that the project coordinator would have to be separate from the tasker & have never had contact with the panel, & the panel would need to not know who the project coordinator was.

I as the tasker in this project was removed from the viewers - some of the viewers were not even in the same continent. Most of the viewers I work with have never met me, dont have any contact details other than my email address.

I'm still uncomfortable with the concept of remote viewing backwards in time and I cannot rule out the possibility of the the potential to 'read' information from someone still alive.

I cna understand this - but think about this. The U.S government spent over $20M using this for over 20 years - every yeare the project going thru, human use oversight committees, scientific oversight committees, congressional oversight committees and many more tests to make sure they were getting scientific data - do you believe that a controversial program like this could have existed for so long if they didn't deliver?

Daz, I count 4 viewers on the main report, that being R,M,G and J. At the end of the report it says “Five of the viewers mentioned a male being involved with the target. “ So begs the question… how many viewers started and why was not all the reports produced?

I dont know - this was done what 3 years ago and I do at least 3 practice targets a week, participate in online practice groups, run groups and participate in projects of my own and for other companies/groups - I cant remember details like that sorry! It may just be an error on my behalf when making the report. The client received the full transcripts of all the rv sessions as well as the summary report.

I am not hiding anything, we didn't do this for money, fame or anything other than practice. the simple truth is remote viewers can go anywhere in time and space to retrieve information.

Now I have to add we aren't 100% accurate - some of us are pretty accurate some of the time - but we all have good and bad days and targets. You could say we are a work in progress.

All the best...
Daz

[Michael]

Its my belief than everyone involved in the project including all people in the future who read the results - are linked at some level.

I'd have to agree with you.

[daxwc]

So Daz or Marv, when your are given a date as the target and place, is the viewer there only on that date or can the viewer float anywhere in the life form’s past life?

[Michael]

Daxwc you've asked me to comment. As far as I know remote viewing isn't much different than most other paranormal disciplines, though some remote viewers try to claim it is, it only really is in labels. The reason a remote viewer is only given a number instead of any real information regarding the target is to keep their mind from interfering with any information they think they might be getting. If you knew something in advance but were getting ideas that didn't fit with that mold you'd second guess yourself and burn out. A remote viewer focuses on their senses and broadens their perspective ( keeps their mind silent ) with primarily the destination ( target ) in mental focus. They might notice a change in taste-or a taste, remembrance of a smell, see an internal image etc, and have trained themselves to note these in drawings or writing in a way that doesn't interfere with the process. The process is a lot like using a ouja board or automatic writing where the practitioner just allows themselves to do without questioning what's happening. Or as a psychic focuses on their sense data in a way that's different from putting a fork into their mouth, to read an object/event.

So to answer your question, from my opinion, since one of the prime operations of a remote viewer is not to block data, yes information could be picked up from a number of sources or dates. What they pick up depends on how well a remote viewer have trained themselves to funnel ( focus ) in prime data relating to the query.