Tarsier79
Im still confused about the numbers being used to point to the target.
If I make a case and give it a number, and someone else puts together a case and also gives it the same number, you may be able to focus on one or the other, or both. A combination of numbers can be coded to mean anything, or it can be just a number in a file.
To be honest the numbers dont have any value other than 'housekkeping' they allow you to assign a name to a project that doesn't tell anyone what it is a reference. I usually now just use the date of the day i set the target so today would be 2101 - 2012.
Now, to make it even more confusing - i do lots of targets, and most of the targets I now do - when Im informed by email there is a project - i rarely even use the numbers given to me. When I sit down on whatever day that will be I just use the days date - I hand over my session and am more often then not hits to the target - the numbers are irrelevant in reality to this actually working. LOL I even do targets and just use the word 'TARGET' as my focal point and even these are good hits on accuracy.
What differentiates the numbers, and how does that number actually point to an object, rather than just being a random/sequential number that, lets face it, doesn't actually mean "Besslers wheel in 1717 Gera"?
Do the remote viewers have to go and remote view the file first?
All I can offer is - we dont know how it works it just does. $20M and 20 years couldn't work out the mechanism - the most likely candidate is quantum psychics - and that everything in the universe is connected and can exchange information. But we dont know how it works.
murilo,
thankyou for your comments.
Bessler's wheel mechanism is what interests most forum members. Bessler kept the mechanism hidden from people's view, enclosed inside his wheel. Thus the mechanism was hidden by wooden boards or waxed canvas, in the dark, inside his wheel, during most of its existence. My question is, How effective might remote viewing be of past objects that spent most of their existence hidden in the dark and known to only a couple people?
Jim, remote viewing could give substantial information on a project like this. To be honest it would need through and long term work, multiple re-taskings and alot of research by the client and the project coordinator - working together. The viewers of course would all be blind throughout.
RV, worked best on past and present targets - when we try to view the future is where the accuracy severely drops off.
I have read the remote viewing document and it seemed to focus on many things that surrounded Bessler's wheel. In that respect it seems like the session was a success.
I believe they did a good job. it could have been better but you see even after 30 = years of research on RV, we still dont know how it works - I believ that as science show, the experimneters and watchers are part of the experiment - Its my belief that the tasker is key to the rv process and that isnt some hidden way we follow what the tasker wants to know - in the best rv success cases maybe the tasker/client has as solid opinion that drives the rv data - as I said, we dont know - its all learning and we are the first to admit its not perfect, it has flaws, we aren't always accurate - but it does work. I for example work with a group that works with the U.S. police on pretty much every major missing persons case in the U.S. and beyond - we have 'helped' in finding over 27 people using this skill as a last resort tool.
Is remote viewing ever able to narrow in on something very specific, such as details of a certain mechanism hidden in the dark interior of an enclosure in a certain place at a certain time in the far distant past, which mechanism was only known to two people? Would this be an impossible task?
It would be very possible to do - but you'd never be able to verify if the remote veining data were real and accurate or not, because there is no existing feedback to confirm this. And bearing in mind the accuracy of different remote viewers this may be hard to quantify. For example myself - I'm approx 70-90%+ accurate 80%+ of the time - things like this because of the lack of feedback would have to be considered into the equation. Even I have misses and bad days about 1,2 in every 100 targets are complete misses.
Also sorry if this isn't allowed but I have an extensive website on rv, with tens of thousands of examples, documents and pretty much every on RV.
www.remoteviewed.com. I dont do this for money (although I do have some paying clients) 95% of what I do if for free, its all in protocol and done honestly.
all the best...
Daz