Qvo Vadis?!

[iacob alex]

Hi Rlortie !

So,if a Milkovic(or Milkovic-Berrett or an other set-up) device type ,gives us a real pulsatory spring,flow of power ,then the main problem of the "free energy" is solved.

How we can pull out the power,is an easy, secondary problem.

It can be in a mechanical manner(Leonardo da Vinci ratchet proposal to his attempt of a PM),in an electromagnetic mode(we are living in an electrio -digital division of history),Milkovic's mode(water-pump) or others.

The main feature seems to be a pumping mode of "something".

When all is said and done,the adventure or a simple "see the world" is not outside us,but inside.

All the Bests! / Alex

[iacob alex]

.....as a dilemma at a cross-road , so to have the first step on a favorable path to a "dream" simple machine , at :

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaPGv7GEavg

Conceptually , for every half-turn , with a free falling inverted pendulum (as an equivalent simple arrangement...) , we have continuous motion...

Al_ex

[murilo]

Unbelievable!
Awesome!
Thanx Alex!

[AB Hammer]

Al_ex

That is one cool disco ball.

Alan

[iacob alex]

.....at : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pLstmr4M48Q
...this is when science meets religion,but many have quarreled about religion / science that never practiced it.
Al_ex

[Rafael Ti]

Isn't the science kind of religion at some point?

[iacob alex]

Hi !
We have an unique science ( not fictional ...) and a lot of religions...
It's only a different manner to understand the reality around us , and to...survive.
Al_ex

[Rafael Ti]

I don't believe so Iacob. Our 'unique science' may be like our 'unique (catholic?) church' with its dogmas pretending to be the truest ones. I trust 'our science' only to the point where everything can be proved without doubts... further on 'our science' provides rather dogmas to believe in or.. to prove - the directions to move.
Isn't it that we on this forum are trying to beat some of them by trying to find a gravitational perpetuum mobile?
There are many issues like the age of earth, theory of evolution, what is the center of Universe or what is in Vacuum .. so yes, we have a choice how to understand the reality around and how to survive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vg_Q9f1KpM

[iacob alex]

Hi Ti !
Take a look at : http://jbuff.com/c112306.htm or make a search about the latin binomial "res ligare".
In science there are a lot of theories , but only one displaying proofs , as a result of our interaction with the reality.
Let's refer to basic mechnics that we can see and test
About beliefs / religions...there were around 10.000...
The Mankind aspires to God / Gods in so many ways...
The problem with the "unique science" is that we can't cheat , deceive ,defraud , swindle , impose upon.
Simply , we must play "clean" this "res ligare"...but not words , only ( every word is a step that needs a proof ).
Al_ex

[iacob alex]

.....science , if not the visible light ( day...night ) only , but all the spectrum of motion is "available" anytime in any point of the Cosmos ?!
The first step in reasoning is nothing but perception!?!
Al_ex

[Senax]

The first step in reasoning is nothing but perception!?!

I agree.

My first step in reasoning that materials were held together from without
and not from within and that attractions were simply negations of pre-existing
compressions was perceiving that the mathematical origin of concrete stress
strain curves was at the point of maximum stress and not at the conventional
origin. 😎

[agor95]

I understand the translation of this thread is 'Where are you going?!'

I was told 'Perception makes Reality'.

There are many things that can be perceived when turning mathematics around.

That is fine so long as it takes you somewhere.

Where does the alternative interpretation of concrete stress take you?

Regards

[Senax]

delete

[Senax]

I understand the translation of this thread is 'Where are you going?!'

I was told 'Perception makes Reality'.

There are many things that can be perceived when turning mathematics around.

That is fine so long as it takes you somewhere.

Where does the alternative interpretation of concrete stress take you?

Regards

Inter alia it took me to the Steorn Forum and from there it took me here.

https://frankgrimer.uk/star_chamber/SC0 ... _Paper.pdf

[agor95]

Cool I did no know the Steorn company were into concrete are you a director?

Putting that to one side; where it takes you is the knowledge that concrete that is not under
compression is dangerous and structurally weak.

One does not have to be a director to know that now.

Regards