In the beginning was the Word....

[ovyyus]

lift

[Gill Simo]

Ooowww....Raj hits a scorcher out of nowhere to rattle the underside of the bar. Will he get to the rebound or will an opponent steal it from under his very nose?

[Fcdriver]

Odd how a relocated return spring, or a different understanding where weight transfers makes a BIG difference, a shifting weight can make a big difference, shifting vulcim points of a semi stationary weight equally does the same, but more efficiently!

[Georg Künstler]

Hi Gill,
in which language should be the word ?
in Old German, english, latin or any other language

[ME]

*mumble, Mumble...

Yes. This topic is not about gaining information; as usual the question (game) is just setup to fail.
The answer does not depend on anything remotely Bessler related, but depends on the appreciation of the topic-starter.
We likely need to rearrange the lines and angles until we produce a non-smooth Ichthys-, or some blocky Infinity-symbol,
He just warned us several times on page 1.

The proper language should of course be Old German, my word is DE:"Wasser".
...While trying to read what that tanslator produced this time, I yet again wander off mumbling something about Die Wichtigkeit des Anhebens ... von mehrerer Dinge.

It's interesting that Bessler did not show a swing amongst his toys.

Interestingly, he did.

[eccentrically1]

ME, why do you think B's word is water?

[ME]

At least in context with the topic-title, and guessing what might have motivated Bessler.
Here I'm thinking about the Raft of God.

[raj]

I try to devise a concept that can be a PMM concept, just like Bessler's. But I always think of my concepts independant of Bessler' clues.

Once I see a new concept that looks good to me, after having spent days drawing and analysing it, then I look at MTs drawings to see any drawing that can reinforce my newly drawn concept.

Clues/codes written in words can be broken by those who understand the language.

Raj

[Senax]

...

It's interesting that Bessler did not show a swing amongst his toys.

Interestingly, he did.

Did he? I must have mis-remembered. 😒

Can you give me a link. I can only find the men with hammers
and a rattle page when I search.

[sleepy]

Hey Senax,
It's MT 85.

[Furcurequs]

http://www.besslerwheel.com/wiki/index. ... 100#MT_085

http://www.besslerwheel.com/wiki/index. ... 100#MT_086

[Senax]

Thanks sleepy and Furcurequs. I thought it was meant to be on a toy page. I didn't realise it was in with all the others.

[Gill Simo]

Ok, enough...thank you all.

I'll run you through my thinking process here....

I have my ideas re a solution, no more, no less legitimate here than anyone else's.
Those ideas are more `an` idea...an idea I've pursued for many a year & still pursue. That idea centres on the only two things I myself have centred on over all those years...Bessler's engraving & the Sabu Disc.

So...if Bessler prompted me for a single word then I'd have one without hesitation...& if he confirmed that this word, when known, could unlock the secret, somewhere within his writings, then likewise I'd have no hesitation in proceeding straight to his engraving.

Doing so I find my chosen word....or do I?

Because the word is found by way of some apparently clever/cunning coding on the part of Bessler....or....by way of my own desperation to end up with a fit. I honestly couldn't say which it is but more to the point, neither can you.

But codes/no codes aside....I stated that the word makes sense of the engraving...and my word does this also, as I'll hopefully soon go on to argue. It would seem that my desperation knows no bounds it can't overcome?

1717...What `could we` make of it?

Abstract art aside, we can make a variety of shapes...2D shapes. Yes Raj, two triangles to make a Star of David for instance.
But there is only one significant form that can be constructed from two physical ones & two sevens....four triangles...a Tetrahedron.

I addressed the tetrahedron to some depth n my `60 second Enlightenment` thread. I did so in relation to four spheres, Sabu discs & the Electricity/Magnetism employed. I hope to return to that thread to delve further into that construct & those Energies at some point.
I also stated in that thread that Bessler's Wheel was exactly the same Principle, employing Gravity instead..but it was never discussed.
I'd prefer to keep that discussion separate from the Sabu stuff...kept here as of now.

I can't dive straight into it as I've nothing prepared. I compose this necessarily bloated drivel in small bites...magnifying glass in one hand alternating between monitor & keyboard, one finger typing with the other. I manage around 15mins max before I have to give in to pain. Sorry, that's not an application for benefits, it's an application for understanding...that it's a hard/lengthy process that I'm forced to go through.

I will be back, Inshalla, asap.

In the meantime perhaps ponder the two options offered above.
Is Gill joining dots that don't exist, with lines that shouldn't logically be made in order to create his pretty picture?
Or did Bessler perhaps give prominence to the solution, in plain sight, by way of a diagram of no particular sense & a phrase alongside it that gave it sense. A phrase with an obvious code within, an obvious methodology to employ, an obvious result to be reached & an obvious connection to be made...except the obvious result requires a switch from the mental to the physical before `any` connection can be made?

A smartarse move if he did I reckon but exactly as I'd expect from the smartarse I've kinda come to recognize.
It's even smartarse enough to address us all....there was mention above of what language?...smartarse sorted it!

Gill

[agor95]

Sabu discs & the Electricity/Magnetism employed.
I hope to return to that thread to delve further into that construct & those Energies at some point.
I also stated in that thread that Bessler's Wheel was exactly the same Principle, employing Gravity instead.

I look forward to your insight in this regard.

[WaltzCee]

about the Raft of God

hehehe, white water!