Bessler's Wheel

[Soon]

A different music but if you understand it, then you'll know it is music;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOn7uCux0uc

Can you lean wit it' an rock wit it'?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4UQ_R4lmng

[Soon]

I received my new bearings today. They're needle bearings. They'll offer less resistance because they have less surface area.
This is where math would say that force increases proportionately. The difference is that the lubricant is more easily passed
between the bearing surface and the axle. If lubricant can't flow then that increases the resistance it creates.
I'm still waiting for my rope to be shipped. And with what I'm doing, I'll need to make 64 oil seals this weekend. I'll be using
wood similar to a washer and attaching cloth to it. Then I'll grease the cloth to make it oil resistant. I'll also enlarge the holes
that the axle passes through in the retraction discs. I have 2 videos. One shows the wheel doesn't like turning and the other one
shows it can work. Lubricating every bushing and bearing made the difference. To keep a wheel rotating it will need to have
seals to keep oil/lubricant where it needs to be.
With the needle bearings, I hope to lock those bearings into place so that the small hole you can see will always be in the lubricant.
Then as the axle rotates the needles in the bearing, lubricant will be pumped up to the axle.

Without lubricating the bushings and bearings; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6QX27HUVHU
What lubrication allows for; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6QX27HUVHU

I did other work in between those 2 videos so now have a better understand of the laws of perpetual motion regarding Bessler's work.
And with a working wheel then people will know I'm just stating a fact.

[Soon]

I am making new axle mounts for it. The 2 sides over a distance of 10 1/2 inches will be off from 90º by 1/4 of an inch.
While that isn't much, it does tilt the frame of the wheel so the end of an arm will be moved 1 in. from center. That's about
1/2 of an inch by the retraction discs. And with those discs, they are in close so this is why everything needs to be properly
aligned.
And with the new bearings, as I mentioned, they'll be supported in their middle so they can rock/tilt a little bit. It is a lot of
work but chances are people will want to see a working wheel actually work for a couple of hours. If it runs for only 10 or
15 minutes then that would allow for a lot of criticism.
The first picture shows the small difference because the retraction discs are not perpendicular to the stand. The 2nd picture
shows how I'll be making the new axle mounts. Where I've made a lot of cuts will be cleaned up. That part will be fit into a
recess on the retraction disc. This will allow for the bearing housing to be an assembly when I get ready to mount the wheel
on its stand again.
And with all of the bearings and bushings having seals then keeping everything lubricated won't be a problem. And if this
works maybe someone associated with this forum will build one besides me? Then it'll be known if this is a lot of work or not.
Some people think there's nothing to a build like this.

[Soon]

All of these little round parts are going to be oil seals. I need 64 of them. And then there's the bearings
for the axle as well. It's a lot of tedious work but it needs to be done.
This is with no lubrication or a little; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZcu-8J0Lqk
And well lubricated; https://youtu.be/s26HbfwDFz8
I tested my build with little or no lubrication and it showed. That is why every bushing and bearing will
have oil seals and a fill hole that can be plugged. If it works it will need to keep working.

[preoccupied]

What exactly are you building? Is it a surprise? Do you have diagrams? Measure twice cut once. Did I miss the pictures?

[Soon]

What exactly are you building? Is it a surprise? Do you have diagrams? Measure twice cut once. Did I miss the pictures?

I'm making oil seals. With 16 wheels on the weight wheel assemblies and 16 pulleys, they each need 2 seals, one on each side.
This way if the build works then I won't have to take it apart again. With R&D it's make something and then make it again and again.
And each time a person should learn how to improve over the previous build. The seals are basic so maybe I'll only need to make
them one time.
I'll have to attach a piece of cloth with a 1/4 inch diameter hole in it for the axle to go through. The round wooden pieces will have a
3/8 inch hole so the axle will have clearance. Once the cloth is attach to the wood it will be greased. Since grease is quite thick it'll
create a seal for the oil while allowing the wheels and pulleys to spin on their axles.
In the drawing you can see the recessed area on the side of the wheel. That's where the seal will be seated. The brown ring is wood
and the black is the grease on the cloth. So if they work then once everything is reassembled then I won't have to take them apart again.
I made a quick video to show how lubrication makes a difference. With little or no lubrication then it barely rotates. When I used grease
for the axle bearings, it couldn't get 90º of rotation. When everything was lubricated, it easily rolled past 90º of rotation. Why I'm taking
the time for what I'm doing.
https://youtu.be/1ezerfk63fY

[preoccupied]

When my time travel duplicate Archimedes existed I remember him making a pulley system that was able to do a 1:1 ratio movement and have extra leverage without sacrificing distance. A lot of leverage actually. When he impressed the King by moving a warship by himself he didn't just use compound pulleys he used a new manipulation of pulleys that has been forgotten that doesn't sacrifice distance. That's what I remember from my time travel duplicate. I was wondering if you were trying any special tricks with your pulleys but I can't see them in your pictures. You haven't given a schematic of your design you are just showing that you are building it. Are you worried about losing your rights to patent in a year? I think perpetual motion machines not only should belong to the first inventor it should be special enough to be considered for a patent despite falling short of patent rules. It's like the holy grail of science. I think that Congress would grant a special patent to the original inventor of perpetual motion machines regardless of what the rules are because it's the right thing to do. I have no ability right now to build my designs but I've shared them anyways as long as they don't lead to time travel or WMD's from infinite leverage designs.

[Soon]

When my time travel duplicate Archimedes existed I remember him making a pulley system that was able to do a 1:1 ratio movement and have extra leverage without sacrificing distance. A lot of leverage actually. When he impressed the King by moving a warship by himself he didn't just use compound pulleys he used a new manipulation of pulleys that has been forgotten that doesn't sacrifice distance. That's what I remember from my time travel duplicate. I was wondering if you were trying any special tricks with your pulleys but I can't see them in your pictures. You haven't given a schematic of your design you are just showing that you are building it. Are you worried about losing your rights to patent in a year? I think perpetual motion machines not only should belong to the first inventor it should be special enough to be considered for a patent despite falling short of patent rules. It's like the holy grail of science. I think that Congress would grant a special patent to the original inventor of perpetual motion machines regardless of what the rules are because it's the right thing to do. I have no ability right now to build my designs but I've shared them anyways as long as they don't lead to time travel or WMD's from infinite leverage designs.

If my build works which seems likely I guess I'll have to thank rlortie, AB Hammer and their supporters. Why I'd have Bessler's Wheel and
work to myself. Now that I am close to finishing this build I'm going to try and enjoy working on it. It'll be strange in a way. I've already traveled
the world and yet I'll be able to visit Germany again.
I think Sina-Drums covered this song because she knew I was working on Bessler's Wheel. And she'd call it my wheel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW4NP8SgIRc

p.s., she knows I have medical issues and if successful I'd like to meet her. She's German and Saxony, Germany is what became
of the Republic of Saxony.
Now what would motivate me to be successful? Not to slow down? Of course FaceTime would work so I could head south of the equator.

[preoccupied]

I don't think your design will work. You are keeping the secret to why it would work to yourself I think and I think that could mean that you haven't fully plotted it out on paper. rlortie enjoyed building rather than designing. All of you old people are probably going to die before accomplishing perpetual motion machines like Jim_Mich did. Luckily I'm the only person capable of creating perpetual motion machines because of my exceptionalism. I've already shared working designs here and I don't even have a qualified professional thinker here to analyze it. If you follow my designs it will work every time I think. It at least has potential. I have my limitations but I'm getting better because I'm drinking coconut water. I had really bad diarrhea for a long time and I never replenished my electrolytes. I must have been sub human for a while, several years. Most of my life maybe. I mean I was stabbed and suffered blood loss, I was shot, I never replenished my electrolytes and then I lived as a sub human until I got even worse with ulcerative colitis after being fed gasoline, and I didn't replenish my electrolytes until recently with coconut water. Coconut water was always key to me functioning at a higher level and I didn't know it. I was healthier as a kid before the bad injuries and I knew how to create perpetual motion machines and time travel then. It's just a matter of being healthy enough to remember at this point for me.

[Soon]

I don't think your design will work. You are keeping the secret to why it would work to yourself I think and I think that could mean that you haven't fully plotted it out on paper. rlortie enjoyed building rather than designing. All of you old people are probably going to die before accomplishing perpetual motion machines like Jim_Mich did. Luckily I'm the only person capable of creating perpetual motion machines because of my exceptionalism. I've already shared working designs here and I don't even have a qualified professional thinker here to analyze it. If you follow my designs it will work every time I think. It at least has potential. I have my limitations but I'm getting better because I'm drinking coconut water. I had really bad diarrhea for a long time and I never replenished my electrolytes. I must have been sub human for a while, several years. Most of my life maybe. I mean I was stabbed and suffered blood loss, I was shot, I never replenished my electrolytes and then I lived as a sub human until I got even worse with ulcerative colitis after being fed gasoline, and I didn't replenish my electrolytes until recently with coconut water. Coconut water was always key to me functioning at a higher level and I didn't know it. I was healthier as a kid before the bad injuries and I knew how to create perpetual motion machines and time travel then. It's just a matter of being healthy enough to remember at this point for me.

You are keeping the secret to why it would work to yourself I think and I think that could mean that you haven't fully plotted it out on paper.

Actually you don't have the time to learn why it will work. Can you understand how pulleys allow for a 2 axis of rotation system
where pulleys link the 2 axis together? Do you understand conservation of momentum, mechanics and math? No? Can you or
other people interested in Bessler's work convert π into rads or degrees and then back again? Are you familiar with the Pythagorean
theorem? How about algebra? (x+y)^2 = n? Can you factor that basic problem and come up with x^2 + y^2 + 2xy? No? Why not?
Then there's 1-Sin^2/tan^2 = cos^2 * cot^2
1= (sin^2 + cos^2)
sin^2 + cos^2 - sin^2/ tan^2 .......... tan^2 = sin^2 + cos^2

cos^2................* cos^2/sin^2 = cos^2*cot^2
------..................
sin^2/cos^2.......* cos^2/sin^2 = 1
The answer is 1. It'd help anyone who wants to understand how Bessler's Wheel worked if they were familiar with analytical trigonometry.
Kind of why I have many builds I can show. Learning or relearning math also takes time just as atmospheric chemistry does. With geometry
and other math, it helped me to understand the mechanical and the mathematical relationship between various functions. Math allows me
to understand what I want to do and how I can get a mechanical system to function.
When Bessler said;

Should anyone wish to speculate about the truth,
let him ponder the rich pageant of words
which I now cause to shower down upon him!

Math allowed for this quote of Bessler's;

Due to the arrest, I burned and buried all papers that prove the possibility. However, I have left all demonstrations and experiments, since it would be difficult for anybody to see or learn anything about a perpetual motion from them or to decide whether there was any truth in them because no illustration by itself contains a description of the motion; however, taking various illustrations together and combining them with a discerning mind, it will indeed be possible to look for a movement and, finally to find one in them."

Math allows for an understanding of the mechanics and the work it performs in his drawings. And that is what gives meaning to when Bessler said;

Around the firmly placed horizontal axis is a rotating disc (low or narrow cylinder) which resembles a grindstone. This disc can be called the principle piece of my machine. Accordingly, this wheel consists of an external wheel (or drum) for raising weights which is covered with stretched linen. The base of the cylinder is 12 Rhenish feet in diameter. The height (or thickness) is between 15 and 18 inches. The axle (or shaft) passing through the center is 6 feet long and 8 inches thick cross-sectionally.

And I know, I shouldn't quote Bessler. It's like you what Christian quotes Jesus? None do.

[Soon]

To simplify the math,
sin^2/tan^2 = y

Multiply the numerator and denominator by the inverse of the denominator.
tan^2 = sin^2 divided by cos^2 is a correct answer. But when sin^2 divided by cos^2 is shown as being
multiplied by its inverse which is cos^2 divided by sin^2,, the answer is 1.
This is where sin^2 * cos^2 divided by sin^2 * cos^2 is the same as cot^2 divided by cot^2 which is 1.
And 1 can then be any number such as sin^2 + cos^2 or any fraction with the same numerator and denominator.
This is basic math of sorts. And then when considering a hundred drawings and their functions, how would you
work the problem?
And if anyone has spent time working with math, it can take time. And I'd say that Bessler knew analytical geometry.
Newton and Leibniz had just started on calculus working independently.
That starts with f(x) = delta y divided by delta x or f(x) = Δy/Δx. / means divided by. That defines the rate of change when
2 values are considered.
And this is what allows me to be confident with what I've learned, I've put a lot of work into what I'm doing.

I know, because I've lived Norway and have snakk Norske, Engleske is the language spoken in here, right? So I am the
problem when I speak physics or math. Just not the right language. But then Bessler spoke and wrote German which is
similar Norske. I haven't spoke Norske since I lived there. But then I know that mat means food while pew means to drink. Right?
And this is like analytical trigonometry when the 1 has no specific expression because 2 dived by 2 is also 1. It's a variable
expression which can have any number of different expressions. And with Bessler's drawings, those are to teach mechanics
and what motion has what effect. The engineering fundamentals of perpetual motion.
When he said an external drum and a grindstone, that gets into math and science because how to apply those 2 variables
and arrive at an equivalent expression? Think about my analytical trigonometry that I showed. 2 different values being changed
by a 3rd value allows for what solution?
And if someone isn't familiar with math then it would be difficult for me to explain my work to that person. I'd like to say even a
good mechanical aptitude would help but how to understand how using to pulleys to shift a fulcrum? It's not what is used on a
swinging weight. Creating 2 unit circles would help someone to understand it because the 2 pulleys would allow them to allow
both unit circles to have the same function when it comes to the swinging weight. I think that's about as simple as I can make it.
And anyone can feel free to quote me on that. This is because both the drum and the grindstone are circles when drawn on paper.

[Soon]

The unit circle above the arm represents the grindstone while the other represents the drum that Bessler mentioned.
This would be the easiest way to understand the math, mechanics and science.
If anyone is willing to discuss with me I'd be okay with that. Then the laws of motion, f = ma, momentum = mv, etc.
could be considered. Of course π/180 = 1 rad might help to know. And then 9.81m/s * a sin º = n. Then momentum
of inertia could be considered when a single overbalanced weight is accelerating the wheel.
Yet to say this requires a lot of work to understand that's a fact. That's because after this building is necessary. At least for me anyway.
For anyone else, if you want to understand what I'm working on, I just explained it. So if my build works out, then this is the
key to understanding it.
And I'll add an attachment for a design. Then again, why give my work away for free? If I am successful which I think I'll be
I'll be able to sell my engineering designs. No reason why I shouldn't be allowed to recoup some of the money I've spent
working on this.

[Soon]

As the green dots were about going along to get along, that is what's important in this forum as well as the U.S.
I will be able to give all of my work on Bessler's wheel to rlortie, AB Hammer and their arrache build group.
I am building ab hammer's invention and he will patent it. And I will say as long as I live it is ab hammer's wheel
and any science I have done is what he taught me. I can do this because when I am safely in another country I'll
be able to build a better wind turbine.
And I will give ab hammer 100% credit for teaching me how to build his wheel. As he told me, he won't give me
the answer to what he knows but I have to earn his respect by showing people what a good teacher he is.
And once it is acknowledged that I have demonstrated a working ab hammer will (a pun because wheel as it is
a double entendre) I'll have nothing more to do with it.
After all, why would I like people who have made my life difficult? And then ab hammer can say that he had
children to feed so they'd know that he's a good shepherd.

[Soon]

@All, rlortie and ab hammer are Christians. And they brought their faith into this forum.
Luke 11:9; I tell you: ask, and you shall receive
It's now a church. Or is it a science fiction forum? Can we really change the quantum signature of matter
and move to a different plane of existence? If we can do that, is it a different universe, a different part of
our own universe or would it be the future or the past?
Using the inverse square law in math, the quantum signature might become a shorter wavelength as it moves
into the future. This is because time itself while moving more quickly (more cycles per second) it would have
less amplitude (power). Does that sound right?
Then the question becomes how can we isolate a specific volume of mass and change the frequency that its
quantum signature has? Does anyone have any ideas?

Just am not sure why trying to show math and mechanics is the worst thing anyone can do in here. That
actually shows how little work is respected in here.

Adding a link to show I don't mind discussing science. https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/ma ... post_88484

[preoccupied]

When I time traveled my dead time travel duplicates would return to me as energy that I would absorb and their consciousness. Is this their souls? I don't know. I would duplicate them at a time in the present and they would go to the past and live and die and then I would absorb their consciousness about 2 year later in the present time. That's how I am able to know who my time travel duplicates are. I am them, I experienced what they experienced in the past and I absorbed their experiences without any kind of brain surgery or anything. It's like I absorbed their souls.

I actually have a pulley system idea that I think would produce extra leverage without sacrificing distance. It requires a lot of extra string. The idea comes from Archimedes my time travel duplicate. The dolly crowbar comes from Yahweh the Egyptian engineer. When I was a kid I invented a gear train that produced extra leverage using angles. I don't know if the Archimedes pulley system that I remember about can help create time travel so I don't want to share it but the gear train that produces extra leverage can remove g-forces and that cannot be shared because it can destroy planets. Because if you can remove g-forces you can move past the speed of light without time traveling and can produce projectiles like a hand gun that can destroy a planet.

I think that souls do exist but that they might become like ghosts. A lot of people believe in ghosts. I think that the ghosts of my time travel duplicates reentered my body as if I were their original body in the past from my time travel duplicates. Maybe ghosts are magnetized to go to their body and I sucked them in after 2 years from their duplication date. It's possible that the Earth rotates out and into spacial positions every 2 years and the ghosts linger in space rather than traveling with the Earth and they return to me when I am within range of them every 2 years.