Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply

Should these changes be put into effect?

You may select 1 option

15
47%
11
34%
6
19%
 
Total votes: 32
 

User avatar
daxwc
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7622
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:35 am

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by daxwc »

Well Walt a democracy is not about individual rights; it is about the majority rules.

I didn’t tell him to go away. I haven’t red dotted him. I haven’t suggested he be banned. I did although suggest he could always leave if he wanted. He could start his own forum and have any dam rule his little heart desires.

One can stand on a street corner with his doomsday sign or they can be the change.
What goes around, comes around.
User avatar
WaltzCee
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Huntsville, TX
Contact:

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by WaltzCee »

Well Walt a democracy is not about individual rights; it is about the majority rules.
So you agree with
Garson O’Toole wrote:Democracy has been described as four wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Thank you for sharing.
........................¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the future is here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Advocate of God Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and redeemer of my soul.
Walter Clarkson
© 2023 Walter W. Clarkson, LLC
All rights reserved. Do not even quote me w/o my expressed written consent.
ovyyus
Addict
Addict
Posts: 6545
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:41 am

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by ovyyus »

Democracy is quite the conundrum :D
Attachments
how democracy works.png
User avatar
daxwc
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7622
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:35 am

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by daxwc »

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard" - H.L. Mencken

I guess being true to my ideology Walt I would tell you if you don’t like living in the USA give ISIS a try.
What goes around, comes around.
james.lindgard
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:38 pm

Re: re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by james.lindgard »

daxwc wrote:lindgard, Jim and anybody else that is complaining you are always free to start your own website and forum. You can even give yourself so many dots green there till you are declared Princess of Drama in the process
What drwma ? According to what you say is to have a group of freinds in here say what is acceptable. I think my having been attacked and harrassed for buildong has been wrong.
And when a person gets green dots for trying to discredit me shows how the rating system is abused. Scott started this forum to shed light on Bessler's work and yet you call me a drwma queen.
And if you consider that this thread is very active and it's primary purpose now seems to be about politics and cronyism and how a few should have authority in this forum.
What you might consider is that mentality might actually keep visitors from posting.
Last edited by james.lindgard on Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by AB Hammer »

No one has or should be harassed or attacked for building.
There has been constructive criticism that has been misinterpreted and then used as an excuse to get nasty to who was trying to help.

On the other hand there has been those harassed and attacked for not showing what they are building. This is also not acceptable.

Anyone here is here by choice and don't have to be here if they don't want to.
I myself am here to help those who are starting out and others to help them look in a better direction than the obvious and well known non runners. Also to show what I have done that didn't work for myself and look forward to showing one or more that does work. Due to some that attack me for not showing even though I have shown a lot, I show mostly on my private forum here on BesslerWheel.
"Our education can be the limitation to our imagination, and our dreams"

So With out a dream, there is no vision.

Old and future wheel videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/ABthehammer/videos

Alan
james.lindgard
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:38 pm

Post by james.lindgard »

AB Hammer,
You aren't the only person who has harassed me for building. As to not showing your work, when you post that it is better than what someone else is doing, you do need to show it. Otherwise people can make any claim they want.

edited to add; @All, research does require working with ideas that some in here might find as a waste of time. This is all a part of learning what Bessler knew.
User avatar
ME
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:37 pm
Location: Netherlands

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by ME »

James, I'm not convinced AB harasses you; perhaps you think he is; perhaps I missed it...(actually I don't really care) you do what you do: If I think the bickering takes too long I just give you a red dot. When you show some of your builds and/or I feel inspired I give you a green one.
You are one of the few who get's a lot of my dot-swapping-attention: which is by-the-way not based on any exact rule... actually you could consider it as being completely arbitrary.
research does require working with ideas that some in here might find as a waste of time. This is all a part of learning what Bessler knew
I totally agree with this statement... so now I revoked the red and gave you a green :-)
Marchello E.
-- May the force lift you up. In case it doesn't, try something else.---
User avatar
agor95
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7739
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: Earth Orbit
Contact:

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by agor95 »

@ME

I agree go dotty in the now and not based on the past.

For that reason I give you a green dot, Duo, you already have it.
User avatar
ME
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:37 pm
Location: Netherlands

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by ME »

In that case: thanks for the virtual one :-)
Marchello E.
-- May the force lift you up. In case it doesn't, try something else.---
User avatar
AB Hammer
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3728
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:46 am
Location: La.
Contact:

Post by AB Hammer »

james.lindgard wrote:AB Hammer,
You aren't the only person who has harassed me for building. As to not showing your work, when you post that it is better than what someone else is doing, you do need to show it. Otherwise people can make any claim they want.

edited to add; @All, research does require working with ideas that some in here might find as a waste of time. This is all a part of learning what Bessler knew.
James L

No one has ever seen or will see me attack or harass someone for building. (I have been known to defend myself though.) I will give my opinion of course. That is what forums are for. My videos are in my signature block, these are of wheels that I have done. I have shown a lot and will show more as time allows.

If you can stay civil, I will take away the red dot hit you with. Most everyone here "since the change" wants everyone to be civil. This is my peace offering.
"Our education can be the limitation to our imagination, and our dreams"

So With out a dream, there is no vision.

Old and future wheel videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/ABthehammer/videos

Alan
User avatar
daxwc
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7622
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:35 am

re: Policy Change -- Sockpuppets & Reputation System

Post by daxwc »

That a boy Hammer. If he accepts you two really need to stay away from each other, be consciousness not to mention each other or bring up old grievances.

I must admit I am impressed with both of your builds and skills. In my opinion etheir one of you going is really a loss.

Although he seems not to know it lindgard building is the only thing that has kept him from being banned again already.
What goes around, comes around.
james.lindgard
Aficionado
Aficionado
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:38 pm

Post by james.lindgard »

AB Hammer wrote:
james.lindgard wrote:AB Hammer,
You aren't the only person who has harassed me for building. As to not showing your work, when you post that it is better than what someone else is doing, you do need to show it. Otherwise people can make any claim they want.

edited to add; @All, research does require working with ideas that some in here might find as a waste of time. This is all a part of learning what Bessler knew.
James L

No one has ever seen or will see me attack or harass someone for building. (I have been known to defend myself though.) I will give my opinion of course. That is what forums are for. My videos are in my signature block, these are of wheels that I have done. I have shown a lot and will show more as time allows.

If you can stay civil, I will take away the red dot hit you with. Most everyone here "since the change" wants everyone to be civil. This is my peace offering.
You are arrogant. I can show many posts where you have harassed me simply because you have nothing to show.

>> Nothing from nothing leaves nothing james lindgaard There is no value on your approach. Nothing to gain. I already have gain in my machine, and you are mad because I won't show to screw up my claim when I claim. <<
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:30 am

http://besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic ... c&start=90

There is also your thread calling me the ultimate fraud. And you stated that I had used as many as 50 accounts and was probably mentally ill as well. I would call that attacking someone and being quite vicious about it.
User avatar
ME
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:37 pm
Location: Netherlands

Post by ME »

Eehm, is there some dot-expert on this forum?
There's a situation with some green dot: It's flickering again. I was under the impression it was fixed.

I suspect it has something to do with some meandering reference to some sarcastic remark about some previous reference which implies other references of certain alleged proofs of something I'm not quite sure really happened.
It's possible I didn't pay enough attention, but it's a rather confusing situation.
Let's hope it's just a temporary glitch.
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

Members having red dots can give negative clicks, but they don't count.

So if a member was at one red dot, and another member gives him a green click, thus possibly raising his dot status to None, and if the former red-dot member had given red clicks to others, then suddenly those others may find their dot status reduced.

So you guys might think twice about green clicking a red-dotted member. They earned their red dots for a reason. Being nice by green-clicking them may be like shooting yourself in your foot.

Just saying...

Image
Post Reply