No Lindgaardjames.lindgard wrote:AB Hammer,
You are the arrogant one as you want it proved to you. The purpose of a forum is not to require proof which you do but is for discussion.
What you miss in YOUR arrogance is that Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of Angular Momentum have been proven. Yet you attack me because you've learned nothing by watching what I post. You have no such need to learn yet feel justified in attacking me for trying. And Scott Ellis might post if his forum allows for someone to try or is it for people who want to judge the work of others. It seems to be the latter.
Jim
It is not prove to me. It is prove to the world.
As for what you miss is to achieve " Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of Angular Momentum" You have to have what drives it and that is where you seem to be missing an answer for that is what we all should seek to win at this quest.
I am not here to attack anyone, but I will defend myself from lies.