in-ex...

[iacob alex]

Hi Ralph! About gravity, the "deep" science of it says ,that it is (has the qualities...) as "dry" water (Feinmann's suggestion...).In simple words it is irrotational, so we can't change the vector "g" ,anyway.No vortices,as we can see in a river's flow face to stones:it can be ,like the stone is permeable,the flow is inside the matter...normally, around atomic nuclei. The stimulative image of a fish that moves so easy in the water ,makes me think about inertia. He swings as a special asymmetric lever (rigid body-elastic tail) and has two fulcra (skin face to water...with compressed air, and the central point of swinging inside,this one related to inertia).In fact,as I see the things ,the dynamics of water or air ,are two expressions of the same basic inertia with (throught) a specific medium.So,with an asymmetric action,the fish gets,normally, an asymmetric reaction ,about his skin...and moves.Now,about the topic,I propose to think alike,regarding inertia.As Milkovic made...my analogy was a mechanical "golden fish",to think about the asymmetry of the inertial effects,as a way to imagine a gravity power collector.Milkovic's fish is swinging,only.Can we determine it to spinn,turn continuously?Or maybe,to catch another one? So,think about the potential inertial effects,more than gravity.Gravity vector is as a fix "6" index of a clock,that we must add with a mobile,flexible one so to obtain ,by vectorial addition ,our desirable effect vector.Excuse me for the "condensed" format of the text,that's my style.A Happy New Year 2007! All the Bests!/Alex

[jim_mich]

Alex, why didn't you tell us you're from Romania?

E-mail address
[deleted]@mail.dnttm.ro

Web address
http://www.geocities.com/iacob_alex/

Home phone
[deleted Romanian? phone number]

Cell phone
[deleted Romanian? phone number]

Current projects
A contribution to inertial centrifugal propulsion attempts in order to find a possible solution (theory and practice) of the Space Drive concept. If so we can go further to Free Energy concept.

Biographical information
Engineering in air force (1966-1999). Now, I have 56 years old and I’m retired officer.

Personal interests
I’m interested to join persons with similar preoccupations.

Alex, you do know how to punctuate correctly! See http://www.geocities.com/iacob_alex/Ste ... tails.html

[iacob alex]

Hi Jim! Really , I am from Romania. Sometimes there, sometimes here ,in California (at my daughter) as a retired person..My web site,is an an old one,but I made some few addition(New! New Drafts!) last summer,about...you can see there.Too many papers in the last years, I am flooded.I try to make my way between a native programmed soft-robot(black humor of L.i.B ,on this forum) and a still normal being. Sometimes I feel that's tolerably for me,sometimes not. Now ,back to work. The last message was about the asymmetry of the inertial movements:an asymmetric action,in a symmetric ,isotropic domain asks for an asymmetric reaction(Lex Three/Newton...this time,as I see the interplaying features).If a balance is a weighting machine for statics,a topic of this forum ,can be proposed as a kind of machine for "weighting"( mesuring,comparing) dynamics.The same lever concept,as that of Milkovic, developed in a "certain" way:on an arm we have a fixed mass("hammer"), on the opposite we have a mobile mass.So,this time,only one open question ,about the mobile mass.That's all. Excuse me,for the format,compacted text. All the Bests!/Alex

[rlortie]

Alex or should it be Iacob? I presume that you prefer to be called Alex.

A little browsing has revealed to me that you are quite active on the net.
Seems you and Sevich have a lot in common discussion over on "Over-Unity"

I find your pendulum pulsation work of interest and am surprised to see that your energy pursuit reaches from Ornithology to Ichthyology. A reaching spread but with commonality. I am impressed to say the least.

Personally you got my attention with asymmetrical inertia, I would like to divulge more but I am limited, bound by a third party confidential oath.

Ralph

[LustInBlack]

Awhh thx, ok Alex you are not a bot.. But you are bound to your style ..

Well that's alright then, but I think you would get more attention and respect by using a style that fits everybody else..

The indexing of gravity around a circle is interesting .. But I don't like to read your posts, so maybe that's why I skip the integral of your posts and think you are a bot .

[jim_mich]

There's an old saying, "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." Alex, if you would post in a more readable style then you would get more respect and more discussion of your ideas. You seem to be using what I would call "Romanian English" or a "Romanian accent." This style is very hard to read and even harder to understand. If you would take the time and effort to write your posts using American English, Australian English or British English rather than your Romanian English then you would be much better understood. People would give you and what you say a lot more respect and you'd not be mistaken for a mindless robot computer program. A few simple well written sentences are worth many poorly written pages.

I'm trying to help us to communicate better so we can understand each other and move on to discussing your ideas.

Give it some serious thought. "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." You can conform, be understood and we can discuss your ideas. Or you can arrogantly rebel and be ignored. The choice is yours to make. I'm sure most here will meet you half way if you put forth a little effort.

[iacob alex]

Hi Jim! I will think about your suggestions .I know this "When in Rome...".Really ,we can speak in so many ways:the language is the dress of thought.More,it can be the blood of the soul or the instrument of science.So many ways...In science ,there is a general terminology ,that I try to use: regarding the style(chinese,togolese or american...) ,it's a minor significance for me,as in music for a composer.I write a text,and as Mark Twain said,it's an window,between what I see and what you imagine.What to change?The style is the man himself.If you don't like,forget me...but for a time ,I will try to be in the line with your suggestions,as I said.For the moment ,I intend to open a topic about asymmetry,lever,pendulum,gravity and inertia,in an "old" language manner(terms),long before US was born ,so not to have problems with "style",or "Rome" as you said.But I am not sure about that...What for?Let's see.Anyway,All the Bests!/Alex

[winkle]

iacob alex

conform

i belive #2 fits here

2 a : to be obedient or compliant -- usually used with to <conform to another's wishes> b : to act in accordance with prevailing standards or customs <the pressure to conform>


conforming might be the last thing you want to do

that path has not brought the answer of Bessler's wheel to any one yet


if everyone conformed we all would still be bluegreen alge

All the Bests

[Fletcher]

thisistheromanzipstyleverysapcesavingandefficientbuthardtoreadorunderstand;)

[iacob alex]

...that was my short and the last interference in your virtual synod.I am sorry and forget me please for disturbing your court.All the Best!I am away./Alex

[jim_mich]

Alex, can't you take a joke? Fletcher was just trying to be funny!

[murilo]

Alex,
how are you doing?
I'm very sorry if I though that you was the reicarnation of Ken Berendt!
Pls, forgive me! I apologize!
Soon you'll see what to expect from the ''staff'' of this forum.
Best regards! M.
( Rome is a single point in the map. There are much more non-romans than romans. The flexibility of ''romans'' are near zero.)

[LustInBlack]

This drama is just non-sense..

We fight over a noob that annoy with his posting format, and I believe it would be easy to change that format, just inserting a Carriage return here and there never killed ..

So why should we kneel for this guy !? ..

I mean, he has the right to do what he wants, granted, but I believe that this place is not unidirectional, by definition a forum is a place to SHARE not be completely blind to the others, you have to comply somehow to be in a discussion, you are not the owner or the guy that controls the way things work over here, you can suggest ideas not impose them!!!


If we can't read his posts, then, why don't format it properly for everyone!? .. That reminds me of Ken's attitude regarding posting length, it's the same exact thing..

And I never attacked him personnally, I said he is probably a bot and encourage him (sometimes a bit harshly) to change his format, I even gave him a positive dot once .. And he is making fun of me..

I find this quite unusual for a noob to make himself known and a new reputation that way. . .

I might not be the most patient guy here neither the guy with the most respect or the guy that gives everybody a hugh; but comon....

And maybe he has good ideas, but somehow, I think it isn't worth splitting my eyes in two to read some garbaged unformatted text..

[winkle]

one page of hrad to raed sftuf

two pegas of gprnpiig

it's eugonh to gvie anyone a hhdaecae

mabe bgeleeurn alge gtos more gonig for it's slef than i reaselid



sorry could'nt helpmyself



let me clear that up



one page of hard to read stuff

two pages of gripping

it's enough to give anyone a headache

mabe bluegreen alge gots more going for it's self than i realised

there that's better

[Fletcher]

Its simple really. If you want people to understand & think about your ideas, you present them in a way that leads to the least confusion, distraction or misunderstanding & facilitates the most discussion of those ideas.

If your objectives are in fact something other than the above, & you choose to write in your own style that's eye wearying, then others will choose whether to read it or not, let alone think about the content you might want to discuss.

I'm more impressed with content than presentation as a rule. After all, Albert E was supposedly dyslexic. So let's get onto some content worthy of all this ruminating & angst. So far its been bullet point electioneering imo.