kinetic energy hypothesis

[preoccupied]

If you can remember my other threads, I posted this youtube video a long time ago.
two stage mechanical oscillator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaCYTu66BzA

The reason Milkovic's pendulum lifts the lever when it is swinging, is not for the reason he thinks, which is its momentum, it is because the weight on the pendulum is changing direction at the bottom of its swing. Which is why when I pump my dumb bells I can be lifted into the air by the weights changing direction. Milkovic observed extra energy and momentum in his experiments but didn't understand that the reason he had lift from the pendulum movement was not that it was a pendulum, but was because at the center of a pendulum's swing the weight changes direction and by a weight changing direction it produces lift. When I push my weights forward and pull them back into me very quickly I am pulled in the direction the weights were going. There is a cushion with weights going in one direction and right back the other direction when they have the save force going in both directions because in order to stop and change the direction of the weight by having equal forces in both directions it cancels out in the cushion so in order to show my lift with my dumb bells I must pull back into me with greater force, but this is not true for pendulums that are swinging at an angle. The angle produces lift by changing direction at the center of the pendulum swing without requiring greater force and it is just an illusion that it is the momentum doing it, it is the weights drag from changing direction that does it.

It's also why these beads to this:

Self Siphoning beads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dQJBBklpQQ

This is a good way to make a flying car and could contribute to creating Bessler's wheel.

Be sure to check page two of this thread because I also posted some stuff there recently if you are just checking in here.

[preoccupied]

In my MS painting I have what I am about to describe in illustration. Okay, so what I want is for my youtube video that I made a while ago to work a certain way. I want the red connection rod to pass through its connection by a purple door flap opening at a certain point. This will allow the weights to slow down when they head towards the center. Then when the red rod pulls back it will do so faster and with more force. I would some resistance springs on the axle of the levers to help slow down the weights. I want the weights to be slower so that I can change directions abruptly repeatedly. By changing direction really hard, it will produce more lift and create propulsion. Good day sir, you are flying!

two weights oscillating
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMJfj6c27Ho

Soon I will make a youtube video of my dumb bells experiment so that you can see my body flop into the air about three inches off of the ground using ten bound dumb bells for no other reason than that I am pulling down on them really hard after lifting them slower. It's my observation with this experiment that you can create lift just by pulling on ten point dumb bells really hard and even more lift by changing their direction really hard. Believe it!

Do I have friends on the forum? I bet if I were whining about something everybody would be all on this topic for the drama. I am literally giving out gold here. Pure gold. I hope that I get some comments or something. Be excited, your greatest thinker is right here before you. I am the best and you know it. Tell me I'm the best. That is what I want to hear.

I just know that the ladies will love my invention and its repeated oscillations will give them greatly reliable performance. Ladies, my levers and oscillations are the most reliable of all the perpetual motion devices. The ladies can rely on my strong long lasting performance and you will use it everyday. People will drive flying cars everyday. When I win a Nobel prize I will be very popular... with the ladies.

[preoccupied]

This is probably a better version of oscillating weights where the weights change direction at 180 degrees from each other. It supports my dumb bell experiment if it works because when I swung the weights off to my side I produced lift but it was hard to do because the weights are heavy on my shoulders off to the side. However, it jerks me back really hard anyways even though I'm not very strongly pulling it.

When you look at this MS painting remember everything I've previously given as an attribute to this kind of drawing. Like the red connecting rod releasing the weight using a purple door flap and allowing the weights to slow down, and in this case they are slowing down towards the 180 degree position (green arrow) and pulling hard back harder because the weights had slowed down.

I have the Benjamin Franklin attitude, you know? I benefit so freely and liberally benefit from the inventions of others, it is an honor to contribute freely anything that can benefit someone else. Appreciation for other people is the best.

[daxwc]

You are the best and the greatest lothario known to mankind. Rusputin eat your heart out. 8P

[preoccupied]

Hi daxwc,

So tell me, will my weights cause my machine to fly?

Because if you only talk about "lothario" rather than flying weights I might have to tell you to GET BACK!

Get back - ludarcris
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37aG0c23Gx4

Know what I'm saying? (I've been browsing music recently.)

Show me respect, I just showed you how to make flying machines = I think. That is what I want to talk about.

[daxwc]

Why flying, wouldn’t boat propulsion be a better fit?

[preoccupied]

daxwc, Why don't you understand my hypothesis?

[preoccupied]

daxwc,

In order to use the levers to propel in water, I would have to make the levers fins. I thought about this and the fins could fold in and then fan out. I think this would produce LESS lift than if traveling through air and using the dumb bell experiment results to produce lift. And I think it would be comparable to using weights in an air tight compartment inside a mechanism, while the surrounding vehicle is smooth to the water. I hypothesis that weights can be used more efficiently to propel in water than fins, such as what I drew.

[preoccupied]

Understanding the chain fountain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eEi7fO0_O0#t=407

I'm going to go ahead and call Bullshit on the Cambridge scientists. Their description is flawed. I think there is no kick from the table. They have not proved that with empirical evidence. They are merely taking observations and then creating an explanation for it.

If there was no table there would also have to be no gravity because the rigid rod would have to stay in place. If there was no gravity when the weight is pulled on then it would not rotate because no gravity is pulling in the other direction to make it turn. And if there is a table and gravity there is no lift because there is no pivot. They are fricken imagining it has a pivot. The part of the rigid rod that is on the table is sitting statically and doesn't have a downward force of any kind in which to produce anything from. The ONLY upward force is the only force pulling it up. I am 100% sure of this. I Call Bull Shit on Cambridge!

What makes the weights produce lift is that they are changing direction. My dumb bell experiment shows that weights that change direction produce lift. If you go straight in a direction and back with the same force there is no lift because it cancels out in a cushion of force when stopping before changing direction but if you keep the weight still before changing direction there is some lift and if you move the weight not fast and then change direction fast and hard you get a lot of lift. In my experiment I laid on my back and lifted up two ten pound dumb bells and pulled them back down with more faster and with more force. I was lifted into the air about 3 inches, my entire mid section and part of my but went air born until I got the recoil. So I undoubtedly unequivocally ridiculously smartly, I Call Bull Shit on Cambridge.

[Tarsier79]

He even continued to make the video even after the wedgy :)

[preoccupied]

Tarsier79, please fill me in on the inside joke that you are referring to.

[Tarsier79]

Note the white material that appears to issue from the back of his pants.

[preoccupied]

Yes at 7:56 in the video he appears to have a small wedgy...

Tarsier79 please #IcallBSonCambridge if you agree with me. Rigid rod don't produce lift. Just kidding. Not about my hypothesis. Kidding about starting a trending hashtag. You know what, forget it. Hash tag to you hearts content.

You can use this:

When weights change direction they produce lift. Mould Effect is false. #IcallBSonCambridgeUniversity

[preoccupied]

https://twitter.com/preoccupied1

[preoccupied]

I think Steve Mould is manipulating our conversation by removing tweets from the list of tweets on his ted talk video. He is taking my statements out of context.

In here, on my profile if a logged off user views all of my replies, all of the tweets are listed.

https://twitter.com/preoccupied1/with_replies


On the list in his ted talk video he appears to have selectively deleted posts by me that support his argument for all logged off user .

https://twitter.com/MouldS/status/485049837592010752

#ICallBSonSteveMould #Dodging

What do you guys think about that?